Jump to content
 

Compound2632

RMweb Premium
  • Posts

    26,249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Blog Comments posted by Compound2632

  1. 20 minutes ago, magmouse said:

    There isn't an indication in Atkins of the source of their information.

     

    A general problem not just with Atkins but with similar learned tomes on Great Western subjects, I find. My unproven suspicion is that it's bound up with a lot of official Great Western documentation having made its way into private collections, which is very bad practice from the point of view of conservation.

    • Agree 2
  2. 2 minutes ago, magmouse said:

    I wonder if there is some confusion here? If this is the Williams supporter, then the GWR type is something else. 

     

    Well, my authority for saying the type used by the Midland was Williams' patent rests on that Traffic Committee minute. The cost in 1906 was £3-8-0 per vehicle, nothing being mentioned about royalties. The minute relating to the Carr's biscuit wagons makes no mention of sheet supports: "Resolved that ten open goods wagons fitted with passenger undergear and automatic vacuum brake complete be built for running on express goods trains in accordance with the plan produced in lieu of the same number of ordinary goods wagons on the broken up list the additional cost being estimated at £33-10-0 per vehicle or £335 for the ten trucks."

  3. The sheet supporters fitted to the 100 Midland D299 wagons lettered for return to Six Pit in 1906 were of the Williams Patent type, according to the relevant Traffic Committee minute. The one known photograph shows that these lacked the semi-circular guide, the arrangement being repeated for the D304 Carr's biscuit wagons authorised the following year:

     

    88-G5_36.jpg

     

    [Embedded link to catalogue image of Midland Railway Study Centre item 88-G5/36.]

     

    I have not found any drawing in the C&W Drawing Register that would apply to the fitting of supports to the D299 wagons. The Study Centre does have Drg. 2820 for the D304 wagons, item 88-D1092, but I have not yet seen this.

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  4. 57 minutes ago, magmouse said:

    And no sign of washer plates, though there must have been something on the inside where the bolts holding the spacer blocks on ended up. Equally, there is no sign in the picture of the bolt-heads and washers for the T-irons, so it may just be the photo isn't resolving what is there.

     

    I think an L-shaped washer plate for the inside top of the corner can just be made out but otherwise the Great Western (and the SECR) made great use of coach bolts that required no additional washer at the head end and were, I think, countersunk into the woodwork, so are well-nigh invisible.

     

    37 minutes ago, magmouse said:

    Apparently, an alternative design by Marillier was tried but not adopted - there is a photo of this. Anyone know who Williams was? Or a way to get hold of the patent? A quick online search didn't produce anything.

     

    There is a biography of Frank Marillier (1885-1928), who was Swindon Carriage & Wagon Works Manager from 1902, in Tony Wood's Saltney Carriage & Wagon Works (GWSG / Wider View, 2007). This includes a table of his patents, including the cattle truck gate lock, held jointly with Frederick Wright, the Locomotive Works Manager, but nothing on sheet rail supports. The references Wood gives for these are in the TNA RAIL 252 series - the GWR documents series. As far as I can find, Bixley et al., Southern Wagons Vol. 3 (OPC, 2000) makes no particular mention of the origin of the sheet supporter on the SER/SECR though they record Maunsell's appointments of G.H. Pearson and Lionel Lynes from Swindon as Works Manager and Chief C&W Draughtsman, which accounts for the GW features of SECR wagons from the Great War onwards, with steel frames and external knees etc. 

     

    No sign of Williams!

    • Informative/Useful 1
  5. 4 minutes ago, Miss Prism said:

    The plates/straps on the insides of the ends (to match the supporter bits) are very logical, but I haven't spotted them on any prototype pics yet.

     

    These are derived from the RCH drawing linked. It's perfectly possible that this drawing follows an existing railway company drawing - possibly delving in TNA RAIL 1080/387-9 might reveal something. The 1923 drawing is for a 17' 6" wagon so is presumably a revision of an earlier drawing; the SECR was using this pattern of sheet support from the late 1890s so I'll risk suggesting it was an invention of Wainwright's and not a Great Western innovation at all!

  6. As I'm sure you've seen, Mike Osbourne @airnimal uses the Slaters S7 wheels which he improves by, I think, thinning the back of the spokes, which inevitably have a V-profile for release from the mold. It's all a question of how far one is willing to go! (And hardly for an 00 bodger such as myself to pontificate on.) But I agree, one can get away with a lot more on wagons with double-side brakes, tiebars, etc. where the general business distracts the eye.

  7. 3 hours ago, Mikkel said:

    Having looked at photos of early GWR motor car drivers today all have moustaches, none have greying beards. Perhaps a generational thing. 

     

    Indeed - a new skill, being learnt by younger men. No-one has grown old in the business yet.

     

    I agree that your fashion plate timeline shows the haut ton. (Let that be your new English phrase of the day!)

     

    You're more likely to see middle as well as working class styles in some of the early films - tramcar rides etc., which also have the advantage of mostly being in provincial towns.

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...