RMweb Gold Captain Kernow Posted July 23, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 23, 2018 Bless you! Cullompton! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted July 23, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted July 23, 2018 Horrocksford. Queens Park actually. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold colin penfold Posted July 23, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 23, 2018 What division do they play in? J Hillock Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted July 23, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted July 23, 2018 What division do they play in? J Hillock Joy 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold ian Posted July 23, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 23, 2018 Cullompton! There's no call for that sort of language. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium M.I.B Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 24, 2018 "It was either stand here knowing that I would get papped and end up on RM Web, or shovel forward - so who got the better deal?" 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Gough Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 My latest Western Region project..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Gough Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 Reconstructing the cowcatcher on no. 1 grandson's Disney train locomotive following a rough shunt/collision with the floor! 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Popular Post gwrrob Posted July 24, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Popular Post Share Posted July 24, 2018 A beautiful sunny morning at Tigley Junction as we see 1363 shunt those cattle vans. 26 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted July 24, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 16 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium St Enodoc Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 24, 2018 Queens Park actually. Hove actually. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium St Enodoc Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 24, 2018 X means that the loco can haul heavier loads than stated by the Power/Weight Classification Disc. The X came in during WW2, along with the re-positioning of the disc to just above the cabside number plate (to make it easier to see under blackout conditions) Was the X applied just to Granges, Counties and Modified Halls or were there others? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Ian Hargrave Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 Was the X applied just to Granges, Counties and Modified Halls or were there others?Don't recall the Counties needing the symbol....though they may have carried one. In their later days with d/c and front end modifications they would be diagrammed for the very heaviest West of England trains and were a motive power mainstay on summer Saturdays and for the heavy North to West loadings from Shrewsbury.Good question though.Must research that. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted July 24, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 (edited) Edited July 24, 2018 by gwrrob 15 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Captain Kernow Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 Robin, I think you could attract more followers if you renamed the thread (again) to: A Nod To Brent - Fun, friendly, frivolity and French fries in the South Hams 1947. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted July 24, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 I think I've had my chips.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Gough Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 Robin, I think you could attract more followers if you renamed the thread (again) to: A Nod To Brent - Fun, friendly, frivolity and French fries in the South Hams 1947.Ham and chips?Does that come with a pineapple ring and fried egg? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Ian Hargrave Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 Don't recall the Counties needing the symbol....though they may have carried one. In their later days with d/c and front end modifications they would be diagrammed for the very heaviest West of England trains and were a motive power mainstay on summer Saturdays and for the heavy North to West loadings from Shrewsbury.Good question though.Must research that. Which is perhaps a timely opportunity to plead the long overdue case for a decent one in 4mm r-t-r.Who will blink first or must we forever be saddled with the current Hornby misbegotten lump ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium M.I.B Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted July 24, 2018 Which is perhaps a timely opportunity to plead the long overdue case for a decent one in 4mm r-t-r.Who will blink first or must we forever be saddled with the current Hornby misbegotten lump ? Excuse me - there's a que! You can't just jump to the front and ask for something like that! There's a Manor ahead of you, and a Saint, and a baby County, and County Tanks - all of which are interspersed with different versions of what seems to be the same 0-6-0 pannier thingy. Then the vintage brigade want something called a Bulldog and a semi roofed pannier no doubt, and a Abba-dare, and no doubt another pannier of sorts. We can't even go close to discussing how many Toplights are in the "WANT I WANT I WANT que" And no doubt without even asking for it we'll get development time and factory space given out to another King another pannier, and more four wheel milks. So please shuffle quietly to the back of a very long que. no further back please bit more that's it - just behind the 97XX tanks. Thank you. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold john dew Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 Hi Robin Every time you post these great photos of 1363 my resolve starts weakening......I am pretty certain they were never seen in North Wales but there is always Rule#1. Not worried about splashers but I do worry about smooth running and haulage power......how reliable has yours been? Ok on gradients? Regards from Vancouver where it will hit the mid thirties today John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted July 24, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 (edited) Not worried about splashers but I do worry about smooth running and haulage power......how reliable has yours been? Ok on gradients? Mine runs nice but needs clean track and I don't have any gradients to contend with. Haulage is satisfactory for my needs. I love mine as it's so bl**dy photogenic especially after James did a fabulous job of weathering her. Edited July 24, 2018 by gwrrob Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Ian Hargrave Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 (edited) Being a monosyllabic person.a simple no will suffice. Now with regard to the X cabside power rating,Wikipedia in its majestic authority does in fact cite that from wartime and after the rating was carried by 4900 and 6959 Halls,Granges and Counties. With regard to the last of the three,their true haulage potential was only finally realised after front end tweaking and d/c fitting in the late 1950's.This was in many ways a blessing because their enhanced performance came in very useful soon after the introduction of the Warships with their teething problems and slow delivery.In many ways they are a neglected machine.IMHO,unjustly so because I remember them in ther element in Cornwall and Devon where their power and sure footedness were very useful,just like the Grange. Edited July 24, 2018 by Ian Hargrave Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold toboldlygo Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 Was the X applied just to Granges, Counties and Modified Halls or were there others? Being a monosyllabic person.a simple no will suffice. Now with regard to the X cabside power rating,Wikipedia in its majestic authority does in fact cite that from wartime and after the rating was carried by 4900 and 6959 Halls,Granges and Counties. With regard to the last of the three,their true haulage potential was only finally realised after front end tweaking and d/c fitting in the late 1950's.This in a way was in many ways a blessing because their enhanced performance came in very useful soon after the introduction of the Warships with their teething problems and slow delivery.In many ways they are a neglected machine.IMHO,unjustly so because I remember them in ther element in Cornwall and Devon where their power and sure footedness were very useful,just like the Grange. The X was also carried by 2800, 2884 & 47xx classes to some degree - so choose your victim carefully. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Ian Hargrave Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 The X was also carried by 2800, 2884 & 47xx classes to some degree - so choose your victim carefully. All of which were pressed into passenger service .....the 47 XX especially so.....in times of shortages. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold toboldlygo Posted July 24, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted July 24, 2018 I love mine as it's so bl**dy photogenic especially after James did a fabulous job of weathering her. Must be the pixie dust in the paint Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now