Jump to content
 

Modbury


Ian Smith
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 08/12/2021 at 16:44, Ian Smith said:

the Association model might do well as a Taff Vale Railway Iron Mink as they were 17'4" over the headstocks

 

Some other differences though, which you might care about, and the detail on the association kit is really rather heavy when compared today. If you can justify some Welsh iron bodied goods vans let me know :wink_mini:. I too converted the association kit by filing the doors smooth to create a CONE. 

 

@Ian Smith,  I might have sent you two different bodies; I modelled both a long and short version of the bonnet. The HMRS tome has some info on this detail.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Not really for Modbury this time...

Tomorrow, myself and 3 other members of the Midland Area Group are going up to the North Mercia Area Group meeting (one of our number is giving a little talk on Tank Wagons) and hopefully we'll get to see the progress Laurie is making with Yeovil. With this visit in mind, a couple of weeks ago I decided that it would be rude not to provide a little something for Laurie to add to his magnum opus.

I therefore began trying to make a few trees to hopefully add a little colour to his bare baseboards. It was my intention to make about half a dozen or so but in the end only 3 have been completed.

The basis this time has been 0.4mm florists wire (in the past I have always used copper wire so this is new to me, although back in the dim and distant I used to use Bowden cable for 4mm trees). I picked up a small spool of about 50 meters (I think) for £3-£4 from a local garden centre, and set to cutting lengths off and twisting them together to form a basic tree-shaped armature.

RMweb1.JPG.9628cfa4e9dbca3eb110ec86701b6a39.JPG

Once the bundle looked vaguely tree-like, I dribbled runny superglue into it to secure the twists as good as possible. Once dry, I mixed PVA, Polyfilla with a little black acrylic paint and an even smaller amount of sap green acrylic to make a sticky mess that I could paint over the armature to cover the twists of wire. 2 or 3 coats were necessary to cover the twists in the wire. As an aside, I always mix this in a small jam jar, the type you get when you order a cream tea, as the screw on lid will prevent the mix drying out for a surprisingly long period!

Once thoroughly dry, I discovered that the bark colouring wasn't quite what I had in mind, so ended up mixing up a grey-brown colour which was sloshed over everything to give me a bark colour that I was happy with! The benefit of my colouring failure is that should the covering chip or crack at any point in the future that at least it won't be a stark white!

For this deciduous tree (it was meant to be an Elm), the foliage was built up from small clumps of Woodland Scenics Polyfibre, small pieces about the size of a thumb nail were cut from the mat and teased out to something twice or more in size. These pieces were then sprayed with matt lacquer (from Halfords), then dragged through a pile of flock scenic material of an Olive green colour. The loose material was shaken off and the pieces put to one side to harden. It was then a simple matter of selecting suitable pieces and securing them to the ends of the branches of the armature. The finished "Elm" can be seen below.

RMweb2.JPG.662560bd6815ce74086da66203f8701f.JPG

The other trees forming this "gift" are a pair of Scot's Pine. The basic armature was formed in the same way as the elm, but obviously formed to resemble the outline of a Scot's Pine. The bark covering received the same treatment as the previous tree, but once dry the upper reaches of the tree's trunk and branches were dry-brushed with an orangey-red to better emulate the colouring that a Scot's Pine displays.

The foliage of these trees was this time formed from Woodland Scenics foliage mat, their "Dark Green", although my bag of this is probably the best part of 30 odd years old so may not be the same hue as their current product as green is notoriously prone to fading! Pieces of the mat were cut/torn away, then teased out slightly before being sprayed with the acrylic lacquer - I did this mainly in the hope that it would seal the material and so prevent bits of greenery dropping off the underlying mat. I'm not really sure that it was a good idea as the process has "flattened" the material, perhaps I overdid the lacquer application.


However, I'm reasonably happy with the "form" of these two and to my mind at least they look like what they are meant to represent :

RMweb3.JPG.f637c5f2ba6d681b5f0bd4681bcbbad6.JPG
I hope that Laurie will be happy with them and will find a space on Yeovil for them.

Thanks for looking.
Ian

Edit : I forgot to mention that these trees are 2mm scale, the shortest of the Scot's Pine is 150mm tall (75'), the other Scot's Pine and the Elm are just a little taller at about a scale 80'.

Edited by Ian Smith
Reinstated the photos
  • Like 10
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

In the past, on Connerburn, I used some masonry paint for the bark.  Terracotta red with some black powder colour added to darken it, for Scots Pines.  You can apply several layers until the twists of wire disappear.

 

Jim

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Ian, 

just by accident I ran into your thread on this website..... 

It is always amazing what you , and of course other members, accomplish in this , very small, scale!

About the scotchpines: 

I think it is about  finescale...so why not try to imitate trees as best as possible like the "rolling stock"and buildings ? ;)

Just my" 2 cents" Try , for big trees12 mm first and than 6 and  finaly the 2 mm fibres and than add /cover it sparsly with the  "coarse" part of sieved fine turf from woodland Scenics. The fine particals I mostly use for shrubs....

I added the fibres with an ordinary ( kitchen ) strainer  and use spray glue to attack the fibres and the turf....502328593_grovedennenHO2015RudolfKlformmbbgroveden.jpg.27ad35258e3040f8dc557b1ae3085829.jpg

 and 2 trees in H0(almost  4mm? scale)

alexanderkuestenkiefer2016juniklform.jpg.f1a68e79816b35ed39f060a793c32a5a.jpg

 

Best regards,

 

Jos

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • RMweb Gold

Excellent images of a truly splendid layout! I haven’t collected my copy of MRJ yet from the local model shop, reading about Modbury is the perfect incentive to make the trip there 🙂

 

Best wishes

 

Dave

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Over the last day or two I have begun reinstating the photos that I have posted within this thread.  I have been working backwards from the latest posts.

 

So far I have completed back to (and including) page 24.

 

This entry is more of a reminder to myself as to how far I have gone back.  I haven't checked to see what photos are missing beyond the page above.

 

I HAVE JUST REALISED THAT THE PHOTOS POSTED ON THIS CURRENT PAGE (SINCE THE RESTORATION OF RMWEB) ARE NOW ALSO MISSING!!!

Edited by Ian Smith
Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Ian Smith said:

I HAVE JUST REALISED THAT THE PHOTOS POSTED ON THIS CURRENT PAGE (SINCE THE RESTORATION OF RMWEB) ARE NOW ALSO MISSING!!!

Ian, I think that is a temporary glitch caused by some maintenance work done on RMweb earlier today. They should re-appear in due course.

 

Andy

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
On 01/04/2022 at 10:32, Ian Smith said:

With the latest edition of MRJ (No. 288), Modbury has finally made it into print. Only a subset of the photos sent in were used in the article

And very nice the article was, too.

It’s a shame - and this isn’t the first time this has happened - that when selecting the photos, thought wasn’t paid to editing the captions, as some of them refer to photos that were presumably intended to appear earlier, but which weren’t included in the article!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
15 minutes ago, Regularity said:

And very nice the article was, too.

It’s a shame - and this isn’t the first time this has happened - that when selecting the photos, thought wasn’t paid to editing the captions, as some of them refer to photos that were presumably intended to appear earlier, but which weren’t included in the article!

 

I've  just reread the captions and I have no idea what you are talking about. I edited the article and Ian was asked for captions after the picture selection had been made.

 

Jerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Regularity said:

And very nice the article was, too.

It’s a shame - and this isn’t the first time this has happened - that when selecting the photos, thought wasn’t paid to editing the captions, as some of them refer to photos that were presumably intended to appear earlier, but which weren’t included in the article!

Jerry is quite right, I supplied the captions after the photo selection was made.  

 

I have just looked at the captions and the only one I think is "suspect" is the second in the article (one of the Buffalo ones which says "this time carrying a C head code for a cattle train").  Obviously, as there is no previous photo of the Buffalo (the first photo shows the Metro tank - indeed it is the only photo showing the Buffalo), the wording of that caption is a little erroneous.  I apologise, as when I originally submitted all of the photos I had also provided a file with captions for each photo, and when asked for captions for those to be included in the article I simply did a copy and paste of those original captions.  The problem therefore was entirely of my own making, sorry.

 

Ian

 

Edited by Ian Smith
  • Friendly/supportive 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

The joys of being an editor.  You can think you have it all nice then for some reason or another you have to juggle it all around.  A picture gets separated from the text it relates too, or the picture sequence gets jumbled. You just have to be grateful that people go to the trouble of writing articles, editors turn them in to a magazine and you get to read it.  I think the odd inconsistancy is a small price to pay. So Ian and Jerry thanks for an interesting article.

 

Don 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • RMweb Premium

All that room in the body for a servo and you can't even change it from forward to reverse gear ;-)

 

Seriously, marvellous stuff Ian.

 

Simon

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Funny 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 65179 said:

All that room in the body for a servo and you can't even change it from forward to reverse gear ;-)

We need a 'cheeky b****r' button for that one!

 

2 hours ago, 65179 said:

Seriously, marvellous stuff Ian.

Agreed! Couldn't click 'funny' and 'agree' at the same time!

 

Jim

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Fabulous work Ian! I built a SRM from a Blacksmith kit in 4mm scale many years ago and that was fiddly enough for me!  How you manage to do it in 2mm is remarkable. 
 

BW

 

Dave

  • Like 1
  • Agree 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/05/2022 at 02:31, Ian Smith said:

A little more progress on the Steam Railmotor ...

 

Most of the motion has now been completed on the RHS of the drive unit.  Obviously, much of this is slightly over scale as in 2mm scale this stuff is flipping minute!!  Effectively, each of the links has been drilled and cut to size based on what looks and works, rather than a scale version based on any drawings available.  The main reason for this is the amount of throw provided by the generic 7.5mm wheel set available from the 2mm Association - I think that the scaled down crank throw of the prototype is somewhat smaller than that provided by the wheel sets used.  This means that the for and aft movement of the crossheads in the slide bars is greater than it should be for example.

 

However, I am perfectly willing to accept such compromises so long as it fulfils my requirements of "waggling about and looking busy".  This is after all a layout model not a museum piece!!

 

For future reference, the various linkages have had their pivot holes at the following centres :

Union Link - 2.5mm

Combination Lever - 3.5mm + 1.5mm

Radius Bar - 4.5mm +1.5mm

(These were the sizes that I eventually settled on as I had to make 2 of both the Combination Lever and Radius Bar as the originals were either slightly too long or short to provide the movement that worked smoothly).

 

The photo below shows the motion as it is at the minute - I have still got to make the Return Crank and the Return (or Eccentric) Rod :

38.JPG.670ee7a332db47b4333115776ad9ddcb.JPG

At the bottom of the image are 3 failed attempts at making the Quadrant, the one for the LHS motion lies slightly above these 3.  As can be seen the one for the RHS motion is in place and free to rock about a central pivot hole.  For simplicities sake (and my own sanity), the rear end of the Radius Rod shares this pivot point.  

 

The Union Link, Combination Lever and Radius Bar were pinned together at their respective junctions with small pins made from 0.6mm nickel silver wire - a short stub of wire was left projecting from the chuck of a mini drill, and a fine file used to reduce the wire until it fitted in the holes drilled in the various linkages.  The chuck was released, wire pulled out a about a mm, chuck tightened and a fine piercing saw employed to cut off the wire against the chuck jaw.  The resulting pin was popped in a pin vice and the head of the pin filed down to leave a little motion pin.  The pins were placed in the relevant hole, a piece of cigarette paper used as a barrier, the other rod slipped on, and a flash of solder applied before the excess pin was filed back flush  (or nearly so) with the rear of the linkage.

 

For the Quadrant and rear Radius Rod pivot, a 0.4mm hole was drilled through the bit of meat that I'd left for this pivot hole on the bent up motion bracket slide bars.  For the outer bracket of this pivot point, a small piece of 0.018" nickel silver was cut and bent (having had what will be the front face thinned to about 0.010") and soldered in place suitably spaced from the slide bars by a piece of paxolin.  Once in place, the previously drilled hole was used to sight the drill so that the pivot point could pass through both front  bracket and rear.  Then an enjoyable few minutes ensued where I tried to line up all the bits and pass another pivot pin through.  Once happy, a flash of solder was applied to the rear of the pivot pin, and satisfied that I hadn't soldered it solid the same was done at the front supporting bracket (again checking that everything was still free to move!)

 

The reversing rod and crank were bent up from a single piece of wire that passed through the middle hole in the Radius Rod, and the crank pivot point drilled in the space left for it on the bent up Motion Bracket Slidebars (any one would think that I had actually planned how all of this lot was going to hang together reading this!!)  Once happy that the bit of bent wire was the right size and shape, the bit where the crank would be was popped in a vice and squashed flat.  A small piece of 0.010" was soldered onto this flat, then filed to a tapered crank shape.  As it happened, the wire when inserted into the Radius Rod slightly fouled the very slight movement of the latter, so I elected to snip off the projecting wire just past the bend so that to all intents and purposes (to a casual observer, who's squinting and probably not looking too closely anyway) it appears to connect to the Radius Rod.

 

A further small turning provides the cylinder front face, and when all these little sub-components are joined up and hung on the chassis it looks like this :

 

 

 

 

So far I'm pretty happy as it seems to fulfil those criteria of "waggling about and looking busy".  As can be seen, I've even managed to get a working valve spindle crosshead (if that's what it's called).

 

Thank you for looking.

 

Ian 

Its looking the business Ian !  :-)

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...