Jump to content
 

Stoke Courtenay


checkrail
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
11 hours ago, checkrail said:

Sorry!  Was amazed to find that the song dated from 1962.  Seems like yesterday.

 

11 hours ago, MrWolf said:

I think that Monster mash was re-released sometime in the 80s,

 

10 hours ago, 57xx said:

I got a copy of it in the 70's

Pretty sure it was re-released in the late 70s, while I was at University.

  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Re released 1970, 1973, 1985 alongside and sampled as part of Monster Rap (which is probably the one I was thinking of, but I remember hearing the original when very young in the late 70s) then it's charted dozens of times since the early 2000s as digital releases.

  • Informative/Useful 3
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi John,

 

Great last shot there.

 

To show my ignorance, I'm interested in the presence manual point levers on the main Goods sidings lines. Were these there because of not being under signal box control and if so was this a common situation?

I'm struggling to see how you could operate them manually if they connected into the box control but that shows how little I know about the mechanics of point switching.

 

Colin

 

 

 

 

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
15 hours ago, checkrail said:

As it's a week for matters monarchical, as exemplified by Robin's @gwrrob"King Edward III" over on ANTB,  here are my two, in a photo that somehow got left out of the recent passing Kings sequence of posts.

y16.jpg.bdc181496974bfd8c6548009ad4ca3fa.jpg

 

Just waiting for the glazing and window bars on the Monster to set, then I think I'll be ready to put the roof on.  It doesn't seem to be a perfect fit so might need a bit of fettling and bodging.

 

John C.


Lovely shot there as ever John.

 

Congratulations on Page 100

 

Looking forward to seeing the completed Monster….

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
9 hours ago, BWsTrains said:

To show my ignorance, I'm interested in the presence manual point levers on the main Goods sidings lines. Were these there because of not being under signal box control and if so was this a common situation?

I'm struggling to see how you could operate them manually if they connected into the box control but that shows how little I know about the mechanics of point switching.

Your ‘ingnorance’ is pretty much spot on.  Well done.

Sidings have ‘manual’ points (called hand points in the trade) because it’s the shunter who is in charge and knows where the wagons are to be put.  They are not connected to the signalbox because (as you say) you can’t have two people in control at the same time.

Paul.

 

  • Like 2
  • Agree 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, 5BarVT said:

Your ‘ingnorance’ is pretty much spot on.  Well done.

Sidings have ‘manual’ points (called hand points in the trade) because it’s the shunter who is in charge and knows where the wagons are to be put.  They are not connected to the signalbox because (as you say) you can’t have two people in control at the same time.

That was my thinking too, inferred from prototype photos - good to have it confirmed by Paul, as I'm no signalling expert either.  The actual levers I used were from Shire Scenes.  Maybe not exact GWR pattern but very nice items, though one needs to be careful not to demolish them while track cleaning, which is why I've kept these two spares.

P1070231.thumb.JPG.a8f90dde84ec7a4c98ee5fdced7d1f14.JPG

 

John C.

  • Like 13
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
On 31/05/2022 at 12:13, checkrail said:

Yes, I've always loved branch lines too, especially GWR ones - small prairies, panniers, B-sets, short and simple goods trains, single track and single loco sheds with rudimentary loco facilities.  But I love Kings and Castles too and couldn't resist the main line goodies the trade has offered us over the last couple of decades.  So I have almost all the fun of a BLT at the junction end plus the roundy-roundy where main line trains can thunder along to my heart's content.  Best of both worlds.  I think it's called "cakeism" nowadays.

 

John C. 

 

And listening to you talk on BRM about that made me go for the same thing! 

 

Your layout are a true inspiration for us all. 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

By the way, thanks to those who alerted me to the fact that this thread has reached its hundredth page!  I hadn't realised.  Thanks for your interest and your contributions over that time.

 

John C. 

  • Like 5
  • Round of applause 2
  • Friendly/supportive 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll second you on the warts and all side of modelling. I've lost count of the times I have done a dry run, applied glue, pulled it apart again, or realised that a floor is not level, or snapped something no matter how carefully I tried to remove it from the sprue. Having hands like shovels and an old injury doesn't help.

What also doesn't help is the awful instructions included in a lot of kits (That is putting it in terms you could use in front of great aunt Maude at Christmas...) Airfix managed it sixty years ago, why can't kit makers do it now with all the tech we have?

I've struggled with a certain breed of wagon kit that has both a step and a bevel in the corner joints. 

But the instructions don't state if ends go between sides or vise versa and the floor is no clue because it's a lousy fit...

But I bash on and enjoy making them up and getting them to at least look as intended!

It's the part of modelling I really enjoy and allows you to have models you can't buy RTR, even if you could, I wouldn't get the same enjoyment out of it.

  • Like 8
  • Agree 3
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I shall look forward to seeing the build and/or conversion details of the new train John.

 

When you say “parts in stock” will this be sides onto donor carriages?

 

Good luck with the build.

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
On 04/06/2022 at 18:17, MrWolf said:

I've struggled with a certain breed of wagon kit that has both a step and a bevel in the corner joints. 

But the instructions don't state if ends go between sides or vise versa and the floor is no clue because it's a lousy fit...

But I bash on and enjoy making them up and getting them to at least look as intended!

 

I know these kits well, they can be a right PITA!

  • Agree 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
3 hours ago, Siberian Snooper said:

Those Bettabitz coach sides is another lost resource, that I never got to exploit before its demise.

I felt the same.  I eventually got mine via eBay but only after a very long time.  247 Developments/Bettabitz had stopped making them before I returned to the hobby and I'd seen them mentioned now and then.  Once I got them one thing I particularly liked was the door T handles, on a raised pad to represent the lock.  Useful for other coaches too.  The thing I didn't like about them was the lack of bolections - there was a recess instead, and no separate bolections on any accessory fret.

 

The Worsley Works stuff is very good.

  • Informative/Useful 3
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, 57xx said:

 

I know these kits well, they can be a right PITA!

 

I have ordered some magnetic 90 degree model maker's assembly clamps from Smart Models after a recommendation from @Mikkel, I might have chance to test them later in the week.

  • Like 3
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MrWolf said:

I was surprised after a 20 years gap in the hobby, just how much in the way of kits, components and detail packs has disappeared over that time. 

I miss the zinc sides from the late Trevor Charlton. Zinc maybe a bit old school, but he had a vast range of coach sides, many of which have never been covered since, especially some of the more obscure toplights and clerestories. His range covered the other big four companies as well.

 

Mike Wiltshire

  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Friendly/supportive 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
15 hours ago, checkrail said:

 

I'm hoping it will end up looking something like this quick mock-up done for illustrative purposes only: 

e1.thumb.jpg.006ee022be7f457d7008f6e31d571fca.jpg

 

The middle coach is actually the one that will go into the set, a C28 toplight from a Slater's kit.  Up 'til now it's been residing in the north to west express rake which spends most of its time in a drawer.  I have a suitable replacement for it.

 

The clerestory van third shown here is a D29 - Bettabitz sides on a Hornby donor carcass and underframe.  This has now been returned to its home in the M-set. I have some D33 sides and various Hornby clerestory bits with which to do a similar conversion.  These sides were produced by Worsley Works at the request of Mike @Coach bogieof this parish.

 

The normal role of the E95 toplight van compo (WW sides - same sides as F20 slip coach - plus various old bits of PC kits) is as  a detachable through coach.  I'll need another pair of sides to do the same thing again, though this one will present its other side for visual variety.

e2.thumb.jpg.5e4332409b3f3f741d3af19cd9693db8.jpg

 

And of course if and when I complete this train it won't carry Paddington - Earlsbridge roof boards, nor will its loco be sporting class H headlamps! 

 

John C.


Thanks for the run down John, that’s going to be an interesting build project(s).

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
19 hours ago, MrWolf said:

 

I have ordered some magnetic 90 degree model maker's assembly clamps from Smart Models after a recommendation from @Mikkel, I might have chance to test them later in the week.

 

I looked at getting a Micromark Right Clamp, struggled to find a UK distributor, then saw the price + shipping from the US and made this myself for a fiver.

 

clamp.png

  • Like 5
  • Craftsmanship/clever 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...