Jump to content
 

Tornado fails on ECML


Recommended Posts

We increasingly life in a "celebrity" culture and FS fulfils that role for the general public, owing the to media attention it has had over the years.

 

The restoration and new build projects are largely driven by enthusiast with an interest in that particular locomotive or class. Will many people turn out especially to see another NER /LNER G5 in steam, or a V2, a Grange, a LNWR George or any of the other new builds in the same way they would for the Flying Scotsman?

Last weekend I went out to get photos of the Great Britain and Fife Circle tours in the Edinburgh area. During the entire day I met about a dozen people, all enthusiasts, photographing the trains. In contrast a couple of years ago when Flying Scotsman was in the area you could hardly get near the lineside at Dalmeny for people and the vast majority were families and other non-enthusiasts.

Edited by JeremyC
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Last weekend I went out to get photos of the Great Britain and Fife Circle tours in the Edinburgh area. During the entire day I met about a dozen people, all enthusiasts, photographing the trains. In contrast a couple of years ago when Flying Scotsman was in the area you could hardly get near the lineside at Dalmeny for people and the vast majority were families and other non-enthusiasts.

But does it last? If FS came back tomorrow, would most of them bother? TV news has a lot of novelty value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps Disney will make a film about Tornado failing on the main line.........that's about as far off the topic we could get is it not?

P

That would be an interesting bit of theatre, not unlike Tornado itself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

It's lucky not every mainline steam failure generates a thread of 15 pages & 357 posts, GW locos get nothing like this level of attention...not that they get out much these days, or maybe they're more reliable than they used to be. KGV was always running hot boxes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

 

 

52f23712e20a3f5bd2e9dc2380fbbe85.jpg

 

 

 

 I bet the big bit a the front is just a heating element with a bit of water to create steam for effect and there's actually a diesel loco hidden in that big black box thingy at the back pushing it.........

 

Cheers,

Mick

Link to post
Share on other sites

 I bet the big bit a the front is just a heating element with a bit of water to create steam for effect and there's actually a diesel loco hidden in that big black box thingy at the back pushing it.........

 

Cheers,

Mick

 

To give them their due, the deception did work for ten years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

What steam might have became with further development?

 

GE steam turbo-electric locomotive, 1930's, and the N&W Jawn Henry turbo-electric. Oddly, the older design perhaps looks the more modern of the two.

 

post-16038-0-31751100-1524720631_thumb.jpg

post-16038-0-72339900-1524720644_thumb.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The six days per week running schedule of these locomotives meant that all of the maintenance work normally done over the course of that week would have to be done on one day. This meant a specialized system was developed, where men in "hot suits" (asbestos heat-resistant coveralls) entered the firebox while the locomotive was still in steam and cleared all of the tubes, repaired the brick arch, etc. As the temperature inside the firebox itself would have been well over 100 degrees Celsius (212 F), and the working area these maintenance workers would have been standing on was the still-hot firebars of the grate, all references describe these workers as 'heroic' 

 

Brit15

 

If I am reading it correctly (and I'm no engineer) Porta's gas producer combustion system eliminates the damaging char from a partially combusted fire, and his water treatment system eliminated boiler damaging chemicals meaning that this sort of unpleasant foolishness would be totally eliminated in the servicing of modern steam.

 

Regarding the 5AT, I suspect it failed to attract funding simply because it was a butt ugly fugger.  Why they couldn't have designed something that looked nicer or more impressive I don't know.  I'd put several designs on our very own Imaginary Locomotives thread ahead of the 5AT for aesthetics.  I keep reading that as FAT, which is pretty much how it looked, short and stocky and over blessed with a big tender behind

Edited by Dr Gerbil-Fritters
Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I quite like the look of the 5AT. Though that's not so very out of character for me...

The big tender is one of the things I like best about it (though it would be nice if it were a vandy).

Edited by Zomboid
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I'd be very cautious about using the word eliminate when it comes to combustion products and boiler water treatment chemicals if you want a long lasting and reliable steam plant. OK, steam locomotive boilers are low pressure but even running on demineralised water with highly efficient de-aerators power plant feedwater is still dosed with chemicals such as hydrazine and sodium hydroxide. Equally, even with far better combustion control than you'd achieve on a steam locomotive you still generate various combustion products which necessitate regular soot blowing and periodic boiler cleaning. I think reduce may be a better phrase, although clearly it also depends on what is considered an acceptable level of maintenance and I know steam locomotives were very maintenance heavy. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Personally I quite like the look of the 5AT. Though that's not so very out of character for me...

The big tender is one of the things I like best about it (though it would be nice if it were a vandy).

 

I agree, I also quite like the look of the 5AT. I just think it'd be a fascinating exercise to see what you could do if you applied modern design and manufacturing to a classic steamer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I agree, I also quite like the look of the 5AT. I just think it'd be a fascinating exercise to see what you could do if you applied modern design and manufacturing to a classic steamer.

I don't like the look of it but do agree that it would be a fascinating exercise.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

At the very real risk of posting something to do with the thread title, the A1 Trust have had the blanks for the combination lever and union link forged and work to machine them continues. The rate of progress is such that it is no longer anticipated that anything needs to be borrowed from the A2 to get the engine back running again.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

At the very real risk of posting something to do with the thread title, the A1 Trust have had the blanks for the combination lever and union link forged and work to machine them continues. The rate of progress is such that it is no longer anticipated that anything needs to be borrowed from the A2 to get the engine back running again.

 

I would call that resilience. Ability to respond to the unforeseen to good effect. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

 I bet the big bit a the front is just a heating element with a bit of water to create steam for effect and there's actually a diesel loco hidden in that big black box thingy at the back pushing it.........

 

Cheers,

Mick

 

Tender drive!

 

Is there a big ringfield motor in there?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Men were made of sterner stuff in the olden days, before elf n'safety went mad, fuelled by extra high tar filterless fags, beer and lard. It was a happier world..

They were certainly happy to come home from work alive, especially if they still had all their limbs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I always understood that the “Jawn Henry” lived up to its name, by making one good run before expiring in the face of new technology...

You might say it was almost but not quite an answer looking for a question. Both the N&W and C&o (with the similar M1) had reasons for favouring coal as a fuel but both recognised that the conventional kettle was obsolete and would soon be a memory. A turbo-electric design marrying a steam raising boiler to a modern electric traction package via a very simple steam turbine has a lot of merit if you are really determined to keep steam alive. Indeed it is probably the only real way forward to address the fundamental issues with steam. However you really need a condenser for it to make any sense and even a good Rankine plant is well behind a diesel for efficiency. So yes, if you really must avoid diesel engines and are determined to keep steam alive then the Jawn Henry and M1 made some sense. In reality they answered a question virtually nobody was asking. Imposing machines though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember another stab at a new coal fired steam loco in the early 80's - ACE3000. Didn't get built though thorough tests were carried out on using an existing preserved loco to gather data. I have an old Betamax video somewhere re this.

 

http://locomotive.wikia.com/wiki/ACE_3000_Prototype_Steam_Locomotive

 

Anyway, good news on the Tornado front - a few weeks and she'll be right again.

 

Brit15

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I remember another stab at a new coal fired steam loco in the early 80's - ACE3000. Didn't get built though thorough tests were carried out on using an existing preserved loco to gather data. I have an old Betamax video somewhere re this.

 

http://locomotive.wikia.com/wiki/ACE_3000_Prototype_Steam_Locomotive

 

Anyway, good news on the Tornado front - a few weeks and she'll be right again.

 

Brit15

 

Ahh...the ACE3000, allow me to recommend one of these (courtesy of brasstrains.com), hand built by Utao Waki, I believe only ten were ever made and if you can find one it won't be cheap.....

post-16038-0-48019500-1524775427_thumb.jpg

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...