Jump to content
 

Hornby announcement 8th May


Paul.Uni
 Share

Recommended Posts

...Perhaps Hornby is going to upgrade its settrack system?  Its been eons since System 6 was introduced, nearly 4 decades ago, and model fidelity has changed out of all recognition since ...

Couldn't agree more, (and I think it is knocking 5 decades since introduction) nothing would say 'a change in direction for Hornby' than such a move. Call it 'Premier Line', 'Permanent Way' or 'insert preferred evocative name here' and sell thousand of miles of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Funnily enough,having run Kato trains on Unitrack in N gauge over the last five years,I was thinking about utrying an oval of Kato HO gauge track for my dormant Hornby collection!

But I won't be buying it from Osborn's!!

If you want a pre-ballasted set track system then I think Kato Unitrak is probably the best there is. Clearly such a product isn't for everybody, but for what it is it is a superb quality product. I have quite a lot of N gauge Unitrak and a little bit of HO and I'd recommend either to anybody considering it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what the reference to the OO gauge Brighton Belle is for, but I'm sure it's not such a popular train (eg: Mallard, Flying Scotsman) where it will sell in box loads in other scales (eg: O gauge). In N gauge it wasn't such a great seller, they haven't done any other re-runs of it. The first half of my post was basically talking about Hornby's possible and sensible ways to test the O gauge market by doing something they already do in OO so I suggested the 0-4-0 Sentinels, unlike their odd test for N gauge.

 

Regarding the N gauge Brighton Belle, there was nothing continental about it. If it was it would've been made in 1:160 scale. Hornby-Arnold from the very beginning decided that the Brighton-Belle was to be aimed at the British market and from the very beginning it was 1:148 scale.

 

And to conclude Hornby have publicly stated that they aren't going to jump into O gauge any time soon.

 

 

 

Your comment was it was " a comical choice".

 

How is making one of the better selling models of the last few years in 00 gauge available in N gauge comical? They're not exactly in the bargain bins for a couple of quid.

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Hornby-Arnold-Brighton-Belle-1969-Blue-Pullman-5-car-set-New-in-unopened-box/302694526632?epid=13014125559&hash=item4679ffeea8:g:sTYAAOSwUd9acfxE

 

There is no point in making A3s or A4s as they are already part of two N gauge ranges. Three if you include Minitrix. 

 

So a taster into N gauge that could have possibly led to more EMUs such as the 2HAL and 2BIL was an excellent idea. IMO.

 

 

BTW the Arnold Brighton Belle was on sale in Europe before the UK. I remember the complaints from those that couldn't get them.

 

 

 

Jason

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think most of us can agree that if someone were to produce an Electrostar, Bachmann would be the preferred choice even if it took two years to manufacture :jester:

Two years? You're generous. More like five judging by their recent performance like the class 158 or 319 in n.

Edited by bart2day
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I thought all the research tells us that office workers are just a tiny percentage more productive than a century ago (after all that capital investment in IT!), because we’ve simply made more pointless work for ourselves producing PowerPoint presentations and status reports. Meanwhile the real productivity gains have been on the factory floor.

 

Paul

I think that depends on what you consider to be an office worker. When I was doing engine and shafting design verification I did the work in a fraction of the time it would have taken not so long ago, not because I am clever but because tools like finite element analysis software, the in-house vibration analysis software, thermodynamic modelling tools and even the more prosaic tools such as Mathcad allowed me to do in a a day what would once have taken an engineer and an assistant many days to do with far less precision. And that is without considering that a lot of things that are now taken for granted were impracticable not that long ago simply because of the amount of calculations necessary (which in itself has facilitated huge gains, such as reducing typical engine weight by 50% since the mid 80's). The section I worked in had never been as productive in terms of the amount of work being done yet head count had reduced from over 50 to 7 since the early 90's. Other sections such as hull structures had seen a similar growth in output and major headcount reduction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

It wouldn't surprise me if they are going to announce an Electrostar. That is the one train with the most units/coaches in the UK, and its area of use has increased in recent months with the GWR out of Paddington. Yes, there are many differences between the versions, but that should not be too difficult to overcome. It could be a great money-earner for them.

Every year since Hornby dropped the hint in the 2007 Model Rail Magazine interview I’d hoped there would be an Electrostar, and with each year that has gone by, its got more and more illogical that they’ve not announced one! There’s a ridiculous amount of these units out on the network now, surely it is only a matter of time...or will we still be saying this in 2029 haha..!

 

Cheers,

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

What I want most at the moment is some decent insulating rail joiners for bullhead rail that look like the Peco metal bullhead joiners, but insulated. A bit of an unusual request for Hornby, but hey, there are people wanting a Fell, or Hornby to produce trams that can't be used on any current layout,

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

On the buses front, Hornby do own Corgi and originally on its acquisition promised railway related releases but that seems to have come to nothing and as far as I can see the Corgi bit is pretty much dead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were Hornby, a top of the range Class 66 would have been top of my list..........

 

And try to "Sweat" a few other assets - Waster container for the KFA, Sealions/Seacow in Transrail, for example, and then.....

 

With Bachmann doing all these limited editions - produce a range themselves with a release every couple of months (but supplied Nationally, not on a regional reps basis), of say between 400 and 700.  A DB 60 or 2, a couple of Class 50's, Northern Belle Class 67, Class 56's, a few HST livery packs of lesser/vynil liveries etc.

 

Regards,

 

C.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine the cost though!

 

Yes a higher cost, but a higher quality of product and customer satisfaction. You see we can all agree that Bachmann has the upper hand when it comes to modelling emus/dmus and has a history of getting it right, something Hornby lacks with disapointing models such as the 423 vep. However this is not a thread for slagging off Hornby, I'm merely suggesting that if an Electrostar were to be produced, people will pay the higher price for guaranteed satisfaction. Cheers, Rory. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I almost clicked funny, but then had a dreadful feeling that you could be onto something given Hornby's past form for sinking their future into churning out muck and tat merchandise that goes down like a lead balloon, many a thing said in jest and all that........

 

For the true abominations in this regard one has to look to Peco's commemorative efforts. As there's a trend for loaded wagons at the moment maybe we'll get something like this?

 

Louis Hopper.jpg

 

They did this some years back but they fell apart after a while and derailed in tunnels.

 

1981Peco-Wedding-U_3195164_Qty1_1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

For the true abominations in this regard one has to look to Peco's commemorative efforts. As there's a trend for loaded wagons at the moment maybe we'll get something like this?

 

attachicon.gifLouis Hopper.jpg

 

They did this some years back but they fell apart after a while and kept derailing in tunnels.

 

1981Peco-Wedding-U_3195164_Qty1_1.jpg

are we talking about the truck or the marriage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...