RMweb Gold 81C Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 7, 2018 No probs Clive, I've posted a comment over there for you to follow up..... His idiotness the Duck Is that deliberate error or a senior one. Con Fuseddotcom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Stubby47 Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 7, 2018 (edited) It's cos the coaches with /with out the extra facilities are by WC (William Clive) Stanier. Edited March 7, 2018 by Stubby47 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted March 7, 2018 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 Is that deliberate error or a senior one. Con Fuseddotcom Sorry, it's cause Clive is always being naughty. P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bgman Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 Sorry, it's cause Clive is always being naughty. P Seems he's not the only one ! Stineer, Stunier, Stamier, .....Bliddy Miglund spill chicker Yours truly Assambird Kindum Brewnell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium New Haven Neil Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 Never mind Bob, that rivet counter from the Sutton Class 24 thread will be along soon and say the Stained Bill Stanier coaches look like a Playcraft class 22. As apparently everything else does. But he doesn't identify the Triang Class 37 bogies properly as Brush 2 #sigh# Dunt Givamunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Captain Kernow Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 7, 2018 Ah, the 'Brush Type 2'. I remember having one of those. Odd wheel arrangement, if I recall correctly, it sounded like aye-up-aye. Easier to re-rail with clumsy kiddy fingers than a Hornby Dublo Co-Bo though, that was one confusing loco. Best to stick with the Blue Pullman. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 7, 2018 Never mind Bob, that rivet counter from the Sutton Class 24 thread will be along soon and say the Stained Bill Stanier coaches look like a Playcraft class 22. As apparently everything else does. But he doesn't identify the Triang Class 37 bogies properly as Brush 2 #sigh# Dunt Givamunky Sounds like a good job that thread doesn't interest me although maybe the odd brick lobbed in might wake things up a bit, not that I'd do anything like that of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted March 7, 2018 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 One day, when I am feeling particularly angry, I am going to get banned due to calling some of these people a very rude name. That day may well come sooner than you think as I am losing my patience with those that have no idea what patronising means. Yo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Clive Mortimore Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 Ah, the 'Brush Type 2'. I remember having one of those. Odd wheel arrangement, if I recall correctly, it sounded like aye-up-aye. Easier to re-rail with clumsy kiddy fingers than a Hornby Dublo Co-Bo though, that was one confusing loco. Best to stick with the Blue Pullman. D5572 was my first loco and maybe that is why I model green diesels. I still have quite a few of them, 2 are being up graded, one is an earlier conversion to a non headcode box version (lowered on its bogies, flush glazed,wire handrails etc). another two are coupled together with their gangway connectors and front doors open, one is still D5572 and another is D5834 the loco that had the extra grilles and was rated at 2000hp. I might even have another one better look in my boxes one day. I think the shape is much better than the newer Hornby offering. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted March 7, 2018 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 I'm counting to a thousand right this minute. A.Calculator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium 2ManySpams Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 Have a peep at the attached thread Spams mate Dava has tried to be a c0cky d!ck again with me aided by his crony Southport http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/131953-stanier-coaches/ enjoy I blame the free-ryders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Clive Mortimore Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 (edited) Never mind Bob, that rivet counter from the Sutton Class 24 thread will be along soon and say the Stained Bill Stanier coaches look like a Playcraft class 22. As apparently everything else does. But he doesn't identify the Triang Class 37 bogies properly as Brush 2 #sigh# Dunt Givamunky I still have two Tri-ang type 3s on their original bogies. Both have had the detail filled off and one has white metal castings of an EE bogie glued on and the other Clive made ones from plastic card. For many years they had the square belly tanks but a couple of years ago when mucking about with stretched Lima Deltics I found I had some spare Lima class 37 tanks so me Tri-angs were upgraded. As for Tri-ang Type 3s on Lima 37 chassis got buckets of them, plus two on Lima Deltic chassis. The Lima Deltic pair look OK until they slide up along side one with the right bogies. One Triang runs about on the Bachmann's first go at a Class 37 chassis. The old Tri-ang body scrubs up nicely. Only got one Lima, more wrong with it than right. I have some Vi Trains which have been in workshops for yonks but are nearly backdated. I think I only have one Bachmann. My bestest Type 3 runs on modified Hornby 47 bogies and has a Slaters plastic card flat pack body. Some Tri-ang 37s, me home made one and a Bachmann loco. Edited March 7, 2018 by Clive Mortimore 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Stubby47 Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 7, 2018 Big nose, 3 windows, big nose, 3 windows, big nose, 3 windows..... they all look the same from up here, apart from the two that don't ( big nose, 3 windows, no square bits). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaughan45 Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 I blame the free-ryders No, it's the free-radicals or if typed inclorrectly the free-radials. Lyme Bay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold 81C Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 7, 2018 I still have two Tri-ang type 3s on their original bogies. Both have had the detail filled off and one has white metal castings of an EE bogie glued on and the other Clive made ones from plastic card. For many years they had the square belly tanks but a couple of years ago when mucking about with stretched Lima Deltics I found I had some spare Lima class 37 tanks so me Tri-angs were upgraded. As for Tri-ang Type 3s on Lima 37 chassis got buckets of them, plus two on Lima Deltic chassis. The Lima Deltic pair look OK until they slide up along side one with the right bogies. One Triang runs about on the Bachmann's first go at a Class 37 chassis. The old Tri-ang body scrubs up nicely. Only got one Lima, more wrong with it than right. I have some Vi Trains which have been in workshops for yonks but are nearly backdated. I think I only have one Bachmann. My bestest Type 3 runs on modified Hornby 47 bogies and has a Slaters plastic card flat pack body. Some Tri-ang 37s, me home made one and a Bachmann loco. 050b.jpg Where's the chimneys?. Tota Lee Feckedtup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gerbil-Fritters Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 Can you lot add linkys to these freds so i can join in too? I get tired wading through the wrong wrights before I even get to the funny bits. Wea Kling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Siberian Snooper Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 Big nose, 3 windows, big nose, 3 windows, big nose, 3 windows..... they all look the same from up here, apart from the two that don't ( big nose, 3 windows, no square bits). Indomitable, would be proud of your diseasal recognition, have you been on the DITD course? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium 2ManySpams Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 Indomitable, would be proud of your diseasal recognition, have you been on the DITD course? Oi, I'll have you know that it's purely down to my efforts to invent a user-friendly and foolproof diesel recognition system, and also a significant amount of time carefully explaining the system, that Stubzie was able to show such skill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium 2ManySpams Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 Oi, I'll have you know that it's purely down to my efforts to invent a user-friendly and foolproof diesel recognition system, and also a significant amount of time carefully explaining the system, that Stubzie was able to show such skill. And for those not aware, diesels can be easily classified by the shape of each end and the number of windows in the cab front. End shapes: 1. Flat (no nose) 2. Nose 3. Sloping Windows: 2no 3no So, Clive's collection appear to be generally of the 'both ends - nose, 3 windows' The beauty of the system is that the small, minor differences such as wheels, bogies, vents, engine type, couplings etc are all ignored as irrelevant. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Stubby47 Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 7, 2018 (edited) Sub-classes may have quiffs. Mind you, that lot of Clive's looks like a choir... Edited March 7, 2018 by Stubby47 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 7, 2018 And for those not aware, diesels can be easily classified by the shape of each end and the number of windows in the cab front. End shapes: 1. Flat (no nose) 2. Nose 3. Sloping Windows: 2no 3no So, Clive's collection appear to be generally of the 'both ends - nose, 3 windows' The beauty of the system is that the small, minor differences such as wheels, bogies, vents, engine type, couplings etc are all ignored as irrelevant. Will this system be applicable to Pencarrow too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Stubby47 Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 7, 2018 Other stuff is happening... http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/122439-stubby47s-project-1-dm-four-mill-something/?p=3077203 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium 2ManySpams Posted March 7, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 Will this system be applicable to Pencarrow too. As there will only be one diesel, the system is unnecessary on Pencarrow. It will just be referred to as 'Diesel'. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clearwater Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 I’m thinking of instituting a rule for my (eventual) layout that i’ll only allow diesels IF they were withdrawn before I started trainspotting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted March 7, 2018 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted March 7, 2018 999. P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now