Jump to content
 

Washout at Dawlish


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold

Gwiwer said 'Voyagers have problems with sea-water ingress in storms which I believe relates to air intakes on the roof."

 

Its not just seawater. A few years ago in Virgin days I took a Voyager from Reading to Manchester on a very wet day. I hung my jacket on the hook beside my seat - big mistake. When we arrived it was soaked through. The train staff told me it happened all the time and directed me to the Virgin desk to collect a voucher for dry cleaning. I picked up the voucher but couldn't find any cleaners back in Eastleigh who would accept it!

 

Godfrey

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Photo by Mark Boutle showing damage to the sea wall at Dawlish. Is it the repaired bit?

attachicon.gifIMG_64008485290507.jpeg

I understand that the copers are on the section that is still under repair, even though it has been reopened to the public. This kind of minor damage is not a big deal, it will be dealt with and happens more often during 'standard' storms of this type than is portrayed by the more hysterical parts of the media (such as today's Plymouth Herald).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Voyagers have problems with sea-water ingress in storms which I believe relates to air intakes on the roof.  As such they are not permitted past Dawlish when high seas break over the railway.  HST and DMU classes don't suffer the same problems and are often allowed past as the Captain says at 5mph.  If the down line becomes blocked there is the option to run a limited service in both directions over the up (and indeed vice versa) though if it's too dangerous then the line closes until things calm down and the track is checked.

There is electrical equipment on the roof, next to the exhaust ports. Deposits from the exhaust coat said portions of the roof and when they get wet with salt water, they cause a short circuit, which causes the on-board computer to disapprove.

 

As regards the 5 mph, if it hadn't been for the minor track flooding in the four foot of the Up Main, trains on that road could have been running legitimately at line speed under the provisions of the Protocol.

 

Speed of all trains on the Down line is reduced for the duration of that level of working, so if the Up line is not occupied by an up train, the signaller will often route a down train via the Up Reversible line, as that will save time.

As a matter of interest what does the protocol state and how does it differentiate between what can run and can't run?

That's probably left to the next SWAG curry night!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The passenger's view ......

video

 

The owner of the clip states she was delayed 10 minutes at the Warren awaiting "specialist drivers" which I take to mean there was pilotman working in force and they were awaiting the pilot.

Edited by Gwiwer
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

A little bird has told me that within the past week or two some of Govt deputation visited the Okehampton line by means of a special train from Exeter.  And this was understood by someone claiming to be in the know that they were looking at the line with a view to restoring a through link to Plymouth.

Reopening the line was one of the options to be examined by the DoT study announced back in March.

 

Cheers

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The passenger's view ......

 

video

 

The owner of the clip states she was delayed 10 minutes at the Warren awaiting "specialist drivers" which I take to mean there was pilotman working in force and they were awaiting the pilot.

Expect some similar weather this morning if the forcast is anything to go by.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

The owner of the clip states she was delayed 10 minutes at the Warren awaiting "specialist drivers" which I take to mean there was pilotman working in force and they were awaiting the pilot.

'Specialist drivers' - I like that term, I might even use it...!!

 

What they actually meant was that when we implement this particular section of the Protocol's working, we allocate a qualified member of PW staff to ride each down train between Dawlish Warren and Teignmouth, who will (at reduced speed) keep a close watch out for anything affecting the track (eg flooding by sea water). This supports the observations of others out there, stationed where we can in safe locations.

 

It is not 'pilot working' in the normal Rules & Regulations/operating sense.

Expect some similar weather this morning if the forcast is anything to go by.

Yes, we have deployed our staff again to implement the precautionary working required by the Protocol.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Teignmouth fencing club is growing.

Today the wall alongside the carpark in Myrtle Hill (the road to Dawlish) fence posts are being bolted to the wall. The compound is now nearly completely encircled in fence posts.

Suggestions on the back of a postage stamp please for what will happen/be stored here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

The passenger's view ......

 

video

 

The owner of the clip states she was delayed 10 minutes at the Warren awaiting "specialist drivers" which I take to mean there was pilotman working in force and they were awaiting the pilot.

I wonder if it was 'drivers' or 'divers'?  But more seriously the train appears to be on the Down so presumably they were waiting to be talked past the signal as it was running right road.

Beware Mike, it may be a mocking bird but at least its not April Fools Day! However, any titbit like this is fair game and it always hooks me but over the course of this thread, those much more knowledgeable than I have indicated that it has drawbacks which are well known. But that does not mean it can't be done providing the will and the money are forthcoming. If indeed the passengers were from the government, then perhaps there is credibility to the bird's tale.

 

Brian.

My informant had the information from an excellent source but judging by certain other things which came from the mouth of the same source I think the comment about Meldon Viaduct should be regarded with extreme caution, to say the very least!

 

In view of the ongoing debate, and rancour being displayed by certain parts of the media, I am not at all surprised to hear of official type folk (allegedly including MPs) taking trips around various parts of the country between Exeter and Plymouth as the report is still, i think I've heard, "receiving consideration'  (something which the cynic in me can see continuing until we close in on a certain date next year, following which we'll hear a lot about the parlous state of Govt finances and the money already spent on the existing route.  Quite bluntly I expect the politicos will be far more interested in the voting power of Torbay than that of North Devon.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kinda unbelievable really - At present, if you go here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/england/devon/

The top story is the news that the line is closed, that it's damaged again - there are no less that 7 story links to topics about the damage and disruption to the railway line...

 

But if you go here:

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/travel/2640194/incidents/rail

"There are no live rail incidents in this area".

 

That's some quality work BBC. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even that bit of reporting was posted a whole 6 hours after NRE cleared the Dawlish report! 

 

BBC is now saying it was closed for an hour, anyone know which hour?

Looking at RTT there's only been one cancelled train there all day, and that was a Northbound Voyager that started from Exeter instead of Paignton.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...