Jump to content
 

Class 800 - Updates


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium

I would buy beforehand if there were suitable locations to do so.

 

Large stations often have at least one outlet. Many smaller stations do not. Neither do station outlets necessarily open at hours convenient to every journey.

 

On GWR and the ECML most trains have had on-board catering available even at 5am

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

If only it was possible to compare the travelling Chef with the current offering, but of course they were done away with a couple of years before IETs were rolled out weren't they!

 

Indeed they were - under pressure from the DfT I believe who saw no future for restaurant car facilities. Given the last years of the FGW franchise was actually a management contract franchise extension what the DfT wanted they got!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't done any actual counts, but on the GWML (not the WoE, I accept) I'd say that more people stop the trolley and purchase something than previously went to the catering car. I very much doubt GWR would release the figures, but I would be interested to know how sales compare between a HST and an IET on the same work, including on the WoE when IETs are sufficiently established for numbers to have settled.

Anecdotally, on cross country services I never went to the buffet, but I do sometimes get stuff from the trolley when it comes through.

I may be unique, but I doubt it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that on catering the attractiveness of on-board services depends on whether you are considering restaurant or buffet service. A proper meal in the restaurant car is one of life's pleasures and something everyone should try. However if looking at buffet service I would rather buy before boarding from an M&S Food, Sainsbury's etc as there is far more choice and quality I think.

 

It certainly is a pleasure dining on a train in Thailand, not "posh" but very affordable simple and tasty Thai food, with a beer or two of course !!. As jib says one of life's pleasures

 

https://www.seat61.com/pop-up-thai-train-menu.htm

 

Brit15

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I used the short-lived Cross Country Grill when such trains included a Mk1 RU. The crew always seemed surprised at receiving an order but the food was good and served by the steward in the restaurant car.

 

I used the Travelling Chef service on numerous occasions and again found it invariably good. And despite having more cancellations than provisions of the advertised service I have made reasonable use of Pullman dining.

 

I have enjoyed meals on trains in three continents and only in thd UK is this regarded as an inconvenience rather than as an essential service.

And it has to be said that I have not enjoyed the meals aboard the Australian XPT which despite having a full kitchen car with large ovens only offers plastic-tray airline meals which are invariably over-cooked.

 

The WR, BR InterCity sector and I believe GWT always offered microwaveable long shelf-life meals heated on demand. Indeed I was able to purchase stew and dumplings at 3am on the Night Riviera with a bottle of wine to boot. While that is perhaps not a run-of-the-mill order there is plenty of scope and ample demand when the product is right. A catering vehicle does not need to be provided at the cost of more than perhaps 20 seats as the Mk2 TSOB vehicles proved and as is still the case with the various sleeper lounges.

 

Efficient rostering means sets are not always kept on long haul duties but there should be enough business offering to justify provision on a Kings Cross - Leeds or Paddington - Bristol turn between the morning and evening Edinburgh or Penzance trips

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed they were - under pressure from the DfT I believe who saw no future for restaurant car facilities. Given the last years of the FGW franchise was actually a management contract franchise extension what the DfT wanted they got!

And the Travelling Chef (apparently) lost a lot of money, I mean one person cooking bacon or sausage sandwiches and being busy from start to finish is never going to make a profit is it, where as a Chef and 4 waiting staff selling full meals is going to make a fortune isnt it?  :O

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

And the Travelling Chef (apparently) lost a lot of money, I mean one person cooking bacon or sausage sandwiches and being busy from start to finish is never going to make a profit is it, where as a Chef and 4 waiting staff selling full meals is going to make a fortune isnt it?  :O

 

Indeed.

 

But it becomes obvious that if you want to shut something down you start by removing the easy money and keeping the expensive bits - which then make an even grater loss thus accelerating the 'something must be done' calls leading to closure or massive restructuring.

 

As any city specialist knows it is very easy to make a profitable operation unprofitable by moving money between accounts / categories / subsidiaries / etc.

 

For example you sell your profitable shop sites to a property specialist and rent them back. This Generates a nice wedge for shareholders but when the new owners hike the rents the shop profits are not enough to pay the rent so now the business becomes 'loss making'. You then sell off the chain to  venture capitalists (who are still bound by those big rents so then goes bust putting folk out of work and people having to travel elsewhere to purchase items. But that doesn't matter - the prime objective (to sell off the chain and generate cash for shareholders) has been achieved.

 

 

The retail sector is littered with copses where this very strategy has been used and its no wonder that if the DfT are minded to ditch catering facilities they would start by making sure that one of the remunerative divisions (a person making bacon sandwiches to order) is removed. Given what as been said a few posts ago about the layout of the kitchen on the new 800s I can see in a few years time some TOC spokesman (note as with many things it will be presented as nothing to do with the DfT of course) telling us that sadly the new kitchens are just not up to the job  and its just not possible to continue the Pullman meal service.....

Edited by phil-b259
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

As various manufacturers of otherwise well respected engines found out during the earlier days of diesel locomotives on BR, up to and including the HSTs, one thing that engines do not like is being frequently cycled between full power and idle, and various positions in between. The thermal cycling they go through as a consequence sets up undesirable stresses in the engine that, repeated enough times, lead to cracking in the major components. Put the same engines in a boat where they run for long periods at the same power setting and they are much happier.

One consequence is that diesel engines for traction use tend to be heavier and more solidly constructed. Whether Hitachi have fully appreciated that is another story; although Hitachi are experienced builders of electric locomotives, they have built relatively very little by way of diesel locomotives.

 

Jim

The concept of engine duty cycles has been understood for many decades, it is pretty important to understand the duty cycle and specify the engine appropriately. However it is not necessarily true that marine engines operate in a more benign environment as it depends on the nature of the ship. Engines in offshore vessels and DP ships face an extremely demanding operational profile with wildly fluctuating loads and even on conventional cargo ships some applications are pretty challenging. I can't speak for all engines but I've ran the calculations and done FEA modelling on four engines comparing the same configuration supplied to rail users with marine engines and in each case the marine version was heavier and the rail version failed to meet class rules. The crankshafts in particular on marine engines tend to be over built because of class rules, as a result of the critical nature of crankshaft dependability. The reason I did that work was engine builders whinging about the higher cost of marine spec engines and demanding that they be allowed to use lighter and cheaper versions of the same basic platform.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

It certainly is a pleasure dining on a train in Thailand, not "posh" but very affordable simple and tasty Thai food, with a beer or two of course !!. As jib says one of life's pleasures

 

https://www.seat61.com/pop-up-thai-train-menu.htm

 

Brit15

I remember about twenty years ago looking in the kitchen of a long distance train in China and contemplating whether eating on-board was worth the risk (it wasn't confidence inspiring to look in the kitchen.....). I decided it was worth a punt and the food was very good.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dinner in the diner, nothing could be finer
Than to have your ham 'n' eggs in Carolina
When you hear the whistle blowin' eight to the bar
Then you know that Tennessee is not very far
Shovel all the coal in, gotta keep it rollin'
Woo, woo, Chattanooga, there you are

 

MKT+Railroad+Katy+Railroad+Dinner+Menu+2

 

beea5267cfaaf059a42bc44cc2055eb5.jpg

 

default.jpg

 

B%26O_dining_car_menu.png

 

Bit more expensive these days --

 

Dining-Car-Dinner-Menu.jpg

 

I'll pass on the Union Pacific Calf's brains & scrambled eggs !!!

 

Brit15

Edited by APOLLO
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

If only it was possible to compare the travelling Chef with the current offering, but of course they were done away with a couple of years before IETs were rolled out weren't they!

 

I do wonder if GWR might be tempted to reintroduce it if they find they can't maintain the quality they want in their Pullman branded service.  I don't doubt at all, from the chap I spoke to yesterday, that the staff commitment is there to maintain the standard and get used to providing it on the new trains and the best of luck to them in doing so and getting the technical issues resolved.  But Travelling Chef would strike me as a potential realistic fallback, but assuming they can get the meals out the other course might be to offer Pullman dining in more of the 1st Class seating area.

 

Interestingly between Exeter and Reading the Standard class catering trolley passed us three times on its way out to seek customers and looked to be well stocked.  The difference between past and present in on-train buffet level service is an interesting area of debate and undoubtedly tastes and motivations vary considerably across a range of passengers and judging by the two return 'ecs trolley workings' I saw it was doing fairly good business but the real test will be in revenue and the level of passenger complaints.  The point about pre-purchase at stations is of course as valid as it has been in some cases for a long time and I have on a number of occasions joined trains at Reading with a one of the excellent pasties which can be obtained from the outlet on the overbridge and outside Cornwall. Obviously smaller stations in Cornwall or on the OWW and Gloucester lines might not have any outlets but quite a lot of the stations served by GWR Class 80X trains has at least one establishment where you can buy takeaway food and it is noticeable that intending passengers buying from them is hardly a new phenomenon and certainly predates the IEP era.  In fact judging by what I see on the 387s operating on 'London Division' suburban services quite a lot of passengers seem to be eating something or other purchased (obviously) before joining the train.

And the Travelling Chef (apparently) lost a lot of money, I mean one person cooking bacon or sausage sandwiches and being busy from start to finish is never going to make a profit is it, where as a Chef and 4 waiting staff selling full meals is going to make a fortune isnt it?  :O

 

From what I saw on various trips to the West of England take-up of the Travelling Chef service was very variable but the same can be said of the Pullman service (e.g on one trip to South Wales last year there were only two of us in for breakfast and we were offered Welsh Cakes in such quantity to suggest they were trying desperately to clear their stock.   Pullman meals are quite pricey but I think one possible problem with the Travelling Chef meals was that they were underpriced in relation to costs, you got a tremendous breakfast for what amounted to a bargain price.

 

The perpetual problem with train catering however is stocking and wastage and it needs careful management and assessment of demand to make it profitable.  At present I understand that GWR see Pullman catering as a sales attraction and might therefore be prepared to stand losses provided they are not excessive and they can make some good money on the best used trains.  But there is I think no way the latest generations of long distance trains in Britain are going to incorporate food preparation areas in the traditional sense and the Mk 3 coach will be the last example we see of them - expensive to build and expensive to not only maintain but clean with a need for some specialist cleaning equipment and staff training to deal with it.  A traditional kitchen area - even in a Mk3 - needed the better part of a day out of service at regular intervals for deep cleaning, Mk 1 vehicles needed several days as a lot of the kitchen had to be stripped out for chemical bath cleaning.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Seeing discussion of on train catering vs 'station' catering reminds me that a pastie/hot food counter appeared on Peterborough station about 18 months ago in a 'pop up' unit near the main entrance doors. I now wonder how much this was in anticipation of IET introduction rather than filling an immediate need. Having said that it certainly seems to do a good trade when I have been able to observe it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

With reference to this on train dining, maybe we are looking at things through rose tinted spectacles? Shock horror etc.

I can understand the pleasure of silver service dining on trains as I actually indulged in that just once or twice, way, way back and it was excellent. However, times were different in the late 60s and I believe that the modern (and maybe younger working) traveller is different. They want to get to places fast and comfortably and have space to relax, work, communicate (not with others usually), read, listen or whatever suits them (yes, just them).

If folk want a premier dining experience then let that be a special event on steam hauled stuff such as the Belmond Pullman and let's extend that away from the Commuter belt of Surrey if you don't mind.

Business/First Class, as it has been, is perhaps becoming outmoded, other than to avoid the 'other' travellers and especially Stag and Hen parties :rtfm: ? 

Should the expectation be to just have really decent 'snacks' and free drinks served at seat/table, in a plush environment where maybe things are a little less 'cosmopolitan' and the security guards prevent the 'other travellers' from 'creating  discomfort' :onthequiet:?  If travellers of either 'class' know that there is limited on board catering, then they can bring their own scoffing items even if it's Smoked Salmon with Artisan Bread purchased elsewhere? 

I also think that the Trolly service could be replaced if it is a chore to get the thing through the train, with the well stocked non perishable foodstuff (other than fruit) style Buffet, with the option to have something brought to the seat of less mobile customers (oh how I hate that word in relation to folk on trains). Good on train Staff Management could cope with that, if training was modified?

What happens on two 5 car sets I have no idea and I'm sure the TOC will not tolerate two Buffets?

Perhaps the style of travel on these mainline services is due to change, but will that be for the better?

Maybe some Open Access operators can establish some sort of prestige services at peak times, aimed at business class and using sensible stock where dining service is not so damn difficult? Pairs of 68s with Mk4s anyone?

Just my ramblings after reading the above.

Phil

Edited by Mallard60022
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Oh for the good old days of train travel with a bag of jam butties, a penguin (chocolate variety !!) and a bottle of tizer !!!!!

 

Brit15

 

On our school trips (1960s), we used to collect packed lunches prepared by BR. They included pork pies (I don't remember the brand but unpopular with many), KiaOra juice and Lyons Fruit Pies.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bowyers pork pies ? Some had done the journey from Newcastle to Bristol a couple of dozen times I seem to remember !!

 

Remember this ?

 

de9b85e5cd463c3949959bc395c6bd58.jpg

 

Look what you get when you (used to) travel by train (as well as copping the Brush 4 !!).

 

british-rail-poster-showing-the-full-ran

 

The old days -----

 

LONDON_RAIL_TIMETABLE_CROP_2.jpg?v=14961

 

Even David Bowie & Mick Ronson liked to tuck in on the train

 

d509653e840879aa44874139f6a0a9be.png

Brit15

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

When travelling between Plymouth and Exeter, usually Cross Country, the trolley can't get through the train, due to it being very nearly rammed and it's one hell of job to get to it and back to my seat before it's time to get off. I no longer bother with on train catering on the way up and have normally imbibed enough beer in the Great Western hotel, as not to need further liquid refreshment on the return journey.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

For those with access. As I had not previously been a member I attempted to sign up. 24 hours later I have yet to receive an activation email.

 

Oops I didnt realise you had to sign up to view, I will pinch oops I mean copy and paste them.

Edited by royaloak
Link to post
Share on other sites

Remaining HST diagrams, thanks to 180106 on WNXXforum for taking the time to type them up-

 

These are the LTPs for remaining HST turns. 

SX
IW1
1A71 04.51 Plymouth - Paddington
1C74 09.03 Paddington - Plymouth
1A87 12.55 Plymouth - Paddington
1C90 17.03 Paddington - Penzance

IW2
1A82 09.00 Penzance - Paddington
1C86 15.03 Paddington - Penzance

IW3
1A79 06.47 Penzance - Paddington
1C82 13.03 Paddington - Plymouth
1A96 16.57 Plymouth - Paddington
1C98 21.03 Paddington - Plymouth

IW4
2T04 07.06 Newton Abbot - Paignton
1A12 07.48 Paignton - Paddington
1C81 12.33 Paddington - Taunton
1A89 15.33 Taunton - Paddington
1C93 18.33 Paddington - Exeter SD

IW5
1A72 05.53 Plymouth - Paddington
1D20 09.50 Paddington - Oxford
1P26 12.01 Oxford - Paddington
(ECS to Reading TCD & stable)
(ECS back to Paddington)
1C91 17.33 Paddington - Paignton
2A65 21.35 Paignton - Newton Abbot

IW6
1C40 07.02 Plymouth - Penzance
1A85 10.00 Penzance - Paddington
1C88 16.03 Paddington - Penzance

IW7
1A81 07.41 Penzance - Paddington
1C84 14.03 Paddington - Penzance

IW8
1A75 05.05 Penzance - Paddington
1C78 11.03 Paddington - Plymouth
1A91 15.00 Plymouth - Paddington
1C94 19.03 Paddington - Plymouth

IW9
1A31 19.30 Bristol TM - Paddington
1W42 21.48 Paddington - Worcester SH

IW10
1P04 05.11 Worcester SH - Paddington
1K04 08.06 Paddington - Newbury
1K11 09.23 Newbury - Paddington
1B27 11.15 Paddington - Cardiff
1L65 13.56 Cardiff - Paddington
1C23 17.00 Paddington - Bristol TM

IW11
1A06 06.20 Weston SM - Paddington
1C08 09.30 Paddington - Bristol TM
1A16 12.00 Bristol TM - Paddington
1B42 14.15 Paddington - Cardiff
1L82 16.56 Cardiff - Paddington
1C28 19.30 Paddington - Weston SM

IW12
1A02 05.30 Bristol TM - Paddington
1B10 07.45 Paddington - Swansea
1L55 11.29 Swansea - Paddington
1C19 15.00 Paddington - Bristol TM
1A26 17.00 Bristol TM - Paddington
1U28 19.12 Paddington - Bristol TM

IW13
1A70 06.05 Frome - Paddington
1C06 08.30 Paddington - Bristol TM
1A14 11.00 Bristol TM - Paddington
1W27 13.22 Paddington - Worcester FS
1P37 15.51 Worcester FS - Paddington
1W03 18.22 Paddington - Hereford

SO
IW1
1A78 06.50 Penzance - Paddington
1C84 13.03 Paddington - Penzance

IW2
1A85 10.58 Penzance - Paddington
1C89 17.03 Paddington - Penzance

IW3
1A83 10.00 Penzance - Paddington
1C87 16.03 Paddington - Penzance

IW4
1A75 05.40 Plymouth - Paddington
1C77 10.03 Paddington - Penzance
1A94 15.52 Penzance - Paddington
1C33 22.35 Paddington - Bristol TM

IW5
1A76 06.57 Plymouth - Paddington
1C79 11.03 Paddington - Plymouth
1A89 15.01 Plymouth - Paddington
1C95 19.03 Paddington - Plymouth

IW6
1A15 09.18 Paignton - Paddington
1G38 14.15 Paddington - Cheltenham
1L85 17.00 Cheltenham - Paddington
1C28 19.31 Paddington - Bristol TM

IW7
1A80 07.59 Penzance - Paddington
1C85 14.03 Paddington - Penzance

IW8
1A92 16.56 Plymouth - Paddington
1C32 21.32 Paddington - Bristol TM

IW9
1B03 06.45 Bristol TM - Swansea
1L48 09.29 Swansea - Paddington
1C16 13.30 Paddington - Bristol TM
1A24 16.00 Bristol TM - Paddington
1C92 18.03 Paddington - Penzance

IW10
1L28 07.31 Cheltenham - Paddington
1G21 10.15 Paddington - Cheltenham
1L58 13.00 Cheltenham - Paddington
1C22 16.30 Paddington - Paignton
2E57 20.44 Paignton - Exeter SD

IW12
1A06 06.23 Weston SM - Paddington
1W21 09.22 Paddington - Worcester FS
1P47 12.06 Worcester FS - Paddington
1D43 14.52 Paddington - Oxford
1P63 17.02 Oxford - Paddington
1W08 18.22 Paddington - Hereford

Note that STP diagrams will alter this as required from week to week and are subject to change on the day. These should be good until the 11th Feb when SX IW11 to 13 switch to IET followed by SX IW 8 to 10 on the 11th March as Clarence Yard put on the other place. Sundays change so much from week to week so can't really help there

Hopefully this will help those who want their last bit of HST fix to plan somewhat

Edited by royaloak
Link to post
Share on other sites

I do wonder if GWR might be tempted to reintroduce it if they find they can't maintain the quality they want in their Pullman branded service.  

 

From what I saw on various trips to the West of England take-up of the Travelling Chef service was very variable

Remember both the Travelling Chef and Pullman are going to be busy in one direction and quiet in the other as they return to their home depot, the one I caught the most was the 0553 off Plymouth and he was busy from start of service until just before Reading, of course his 'home' trip (1003 off PAD I think it was) would have been very quiet, the same for the ones working up around lunch time for their busy trip down in the evening.

 

It wont be re-introduced because either the Standard Class passengers would have to go through 1ST Class to get served, or all the food will have to be walked through 1ST Class to serve the Standard Class passengers, neither is going to be acceptable, the Travelling Chef is done due to the position of the food prep area on the IETs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

When travelling between Plymouth and Exeter, usually Cross Country, the trolley can't get through the train, due to it being very nearly rammed and it's one hell of job to get to it and back to my seat before it's time to get off. I no longer bother with on train catering on the way up and have normally imbibed enough beer in the Great Western hotel, as not to need further liquid refreshment on the return journey.

And if you are a Whitehall mandarin you use the low revenue to say say that passengers don’t use the trolley service so it should be axed.

 

As I said earlier if you are a sufficiently ‘tallented’ been counter managing statistic to support a pre-determined objective is easy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...