I've had the pleasure of having actually MET all three of these blokes and I can say the following with the knowledge of first hand experience:
- Jeremy Clarkson is an extremely nice man (as long as he hasn't got a drink in him apparently) who has a genuine interest in engineering, technology and history. When someone disagrees with him, he is interested in finding out their point of view and debating those differences. His 'orang-utan' character is just that, a character. One which, in print and on the screen, has made him an exceptionally wealthy and famous man, so why on earth would he stop doing it?
-James May is not as dull or as fuddy duddy as the series makes him appear. Again 'captain slow' is someone who he portrays on TV rather than his actual personality
-Richard Hammond is the closest to his TV persona. He's a loud ex-brummie who enjoys fast cars and country life.
Now, the entire TV series since they were together as a three-man band on Top Gear to the present episode of the Grand Tour has never come close to being factual. Its entertainment, and its entertaining to see three blokes mucking about in cars that most of us could only afford if we sold every other worldly possession in the world. it is fun above all other things - what does converting a VW van into a canal boat prove? Nothing, but I laughed until my sides hurt
Besides, on those few occasions when they did become serious (looking in the window of the Jensen and TWR factories, The armed forces rally team, The aftermath of hurricane Katrina in the American special, the tribute to Ayrton Senna) the contrast to their usual tone make it all the more noteworthy.
Its never going to be all things to all people, and rattling off a series of facts and figures instead of being funny will simply make people turn off the TV and then nothing gets made. Next thing is that people will be annoyed that zebras are stripey