So the Mk2a should be 0.16mm lower than the Mk1 but in Farish' case it is over a mm different and quite noticeable. When you look at a photo of a real Mk1 and Mk2a coupled together the height difference is not noticeable.
Cheers
Mark
That Glasgow QSt- Colchester train wouldn't have carried BFPO mail. All BFPO mail went via London stations, collected by Postal and Courier services Royal Engineers and taken to BFPO London in Mill Hill. This was known to the post office as Home postal Depot.
Cheers
Mark
It is no good them chucking everything out at once though because most people have a budget for their hobbies. This would mean they would have stock sitting unsold on shelves if they are not careful.
Still, they must know what they are doing!
Cheers
Mark
I know what you mean.. they are a royal pain in the butt!
I had to swap my wheelsets around but I now have a Mk2a bso that is unusable.. never had the problem with a Mk1 though..
Cheers
Mark
The only thing I can see that is wrong with these is the receiver socket for the multiple working jumpers..
Other than that they look superb!
Cheers
Mark
Just been to see if the Bachmann website is available..
It seems we have now got to wait until "later in the year" and there is no mention of the railway side except the collectors club...
Disappointedly yours
Mark
Sorry to resurrect an old thread but does anyone know where I can obtain some RCH? jumper cables for the class 86/4 Dapol have produced. I know they have the TDM cables but the seem a bit nude without the rest of the plumbing!
Cheers
Mark
I believe Dave Jones commented on this years ago while he was still at Dapol.. He said measure the pockets and see who got the size correct. if I remember rightly!
Cheers
Mark
I think that Hattons estimated their prices back in 2013 when a Mk1 coach was around £16 to purchase from them.. 5 years later costs have risen astronomically so the estimate that was way out of date had to be radically altered when the RRP was announced.. I'm so glad I'm not a retailer!
Cheers
Mark
Hi David,
Excellent work so far, I'll be following your thread from now on..
You are modelling the period directly following what I model (82-92) so I'm probably going to be cribbing some of your ideas!
Cheers
Mark