Jump to content
 

teaky

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    2,335
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by teaky

  1. The narrower one looks a little better but there's not that much in it. What if you introduced some vertical pillars or other 3D element to the support walls? That would narrow the gap without necessarily reducing the girder span. Perhaps the wider span is needed to accommodate some additional infrastructure (railway or non-railway) like piping and/or a water main, or a footpath (with a fence?) ?
  2. Indeed. Or, by 1905, 'Buffalo Bill' Cody's Wild West Show? A set each of Airfix Cowboys and Indians and you're sorted for figures.
  3. When I think of the Edwardian railways I think of a time when manpower was more plentiful and thus less expensive. This allowed more time to be devoted to keeping everything clean and polished. So locomotive and rolling stock liveries were more ornate and included more shiny bits. With this in mind it seems a pity not to fabricate an excuse for the local yeomanry to turn out in full ceremonial kit and some kind of royal connection sounds like an ideal excuse.
  4. Food for thought there Edwardian and Nearholmer. Thank you. I shall continue with my occasional pondering of this topic. (Inevitably, I have some thoughts and opinions but it is likely that they all stray outside of the RMweb rules (of which I am supportive), so it's probably best I leave the topic alone.)
  5. I hope you don't mind me asking, and thereby risking wandering off topic, but is it possible for a republican to serve in the armed forces, i.e. can one volunteer (or indeed be conscripted) to fight for one's country and wish to see the back of the monarchy? I am seeing parallels here with courts and so on and religion where there is a process in place for people to swear without the bible being involved.
  6. Either a very naughty boy or a previous prophet now supplanted by Dave.
  7. ...and...http://www.dartcastings.co.uk/dart/A6.php
  8. Yes but they don't seem to come in rabbit-only packs. http://www.langleymodels.co.uk/shop/sh000001.pl?REFPAGE=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2elangleymodels%2eco%2euk%2f&WD=rabbits&PN=Online_Catalogue_OO_Scale_Accessories_F77_to_F171f_14%2ehtml%23aF145#aF145 Although there are some TT scale ones: http://www.langleymodels.co.uk/shop/sh000001.pl?REFPAGE=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2elangleymodels%2eco%2euk%2f&WD=rabbits&PN=Online_Catalogue_TT_scale__3mm__Kits_NEW_Kits_57%2ehtml%23aTT13#aTT13
  9. teaky

    Oxford N7

    The following three out of the original GER N7s received round-top firboxes after nationalisation (confirming Downer's post): 69602 (June 1949), 69609 (August 1948) and 69618 (July 1948). This was so soon after nationalisation that, as you say, they probably didn't get BR livery before being rebuilt.
  10. teaky

    Oxford N7

    69689 and 69695 withdrawn in 1957 and 1958 respectively were the only ones still with Belpaire fireboxes at withdrawal, but there were plenty of others that only received the round top firebox after nationalisationand quite a few not until the '50s.
  11. Morning Tony. MRJ 252 has just dropped through the door and features a very attractive ECML layout.
  12. Whatever you do Stubby, don't take advice on this subject from Dave. His avatar should be sufficient warning!
  13. Two tone red and white with anchovy interior and black olive trim?
  14. In the July 1978 Railway Modeller there was an article on converting the Ratio Midland suburban coaches into a representation of some GCR stock.
  15. A fine piece of work. It captures the original perfectly with the right over all look, restrained colouring and some excellent detailing. I bet you're pleased with that. More please.
  16. That last picture is still recognisable today. https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.3482191,-2.0949187,3a,30y,102.43h,88.8t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sscorwOgjUUHmLtYT2NuxAA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
  17. I thought K stood for "Korridor" too (with the exception of RK and RKB where it meant "kitchen") and K was used because C denoted "Composite". So that matches what 31A says above. I am not aware there is anything to specifically indicate gangwayed coaches though. There were, for example, RC, CK, CO and SLC all with gangways.
  18. http://herefordmodels.com/index.php?main_page=advanced_search_result&search_in_description=1&zenid=9b57ae7dddfb7e1ae3b4288fdd5c25b0&keyword=cct http://www.track-shack.com/cgi-bin/sh000001.pl?WD=cct&PN=Bachmann%2d39%2d528%2dEx%2dSouthern%2dCCT%2dCovered%2dCarriage%2dTruck%2dBR%2dBlue%2dBachmann%2d39%2d528%2ehtml#SID=122
  19. It gets tricky sometimes though. I occasionally click Like in order to encourage modellers who are perhaps less experienced or who may have just embarked on a facet of our hobby which they have never tried before. If only the very best modelling received praise, then how many people would lose heart before their own standards improved? Then, of course, there's the dilema of whether or not to encourage some nutter who is determined to reproduce all the north country's walling stone by stone!
  20. I dunno this one is pretty good too. P.S. I was going to put in a link to enginewood.co.uk but the proprietor appears to have gone into the handbag business. Is there something we should be told?
  21. You have more than 47 followers Rob. It isn't a feature I make use of but yours is one of threads I read regularly. I'm sure that must be true of many more RMwebbers who are, like me, entertained by the combination of quality modelling and humour.
×
×
  • Create New...