mikesndbs Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 I'd really appreciate advice on cleaning the rods on my 30071, don't want to do anything that makes it worse! 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold tetsudofan Posted October 22, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted October 22, 2016 I'd really appreciate advice on cleaning the rods on my 30071, don't want to do anything that makes it worse! Surely your question has been answered in post #726 by Dibber25. Send it back to Kernow as mentioned above seems to be the best option........ 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikesndbs Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 I've just checked mine and there are no black splodges on the coupling rods. Is it oil from the mechanism which has got spread around in transit? You could phone Kernow and ask them to exchange it for one without black splodges. If you try to remove it, you may well remove the weathering and end up with pristine rods on a dirty loco. Looking at mine again, after viewing your movie, I can confirm there is no black on the rods. However, I have noticed that mine (already having done a fair amount of work and handling) is starting to lose the weathering off the rods, and they are bright underneath. (CJL) Hi and many thanks for the reply, missed it as no notifications oddly. Anyway, I found that gently rubbing my finger nail along the rods has removed the black marks easily, so no problem at all now great stuff 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dibber25 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 I received 30071 this week. It is going to become the Meldon Pilot.....or is it? This is such a superb model and beautifully finished that I wonder if I should 'spoil' it by converting it. Maybe I'll get another if Baccy/MR/Kernow decide that the Meldon version is worth a punt (hint.......) or I might just get another suitable donor and convert that as this item is worth just sitting in a display case in my lounge to be admired for its workmanship. This has to be one of the best looking loco models for a long while despite some thinking it had/has an ugly prototype. Even the enclosed paperwork is top notch with beautiful diagrams and clear instructions. Thanks you Dibber and Co, Baccy and kernow (excellent service as always). Total bargain. Phil @ SOSJ I'm sorry but Model Rail won't be doing the Meldon pilot. Bachmann required us to take everything we wanted in one go. The 10 variants we selected cover the total production run of some 5,000. It may be that Bachmann will issue USAs as part of their own range in due course, but that will not be until after we have sold all the MR models. (CJL) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Ian J. Posted October 22, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 22, 2016 I'm sorry but Model Rail won't be doing the Meldon pilot. Bachmann required us to take everything we wanted in one go. The 10 variants we selected cover the total production run of some 5,000. It may be that Bachmann will issue USAs as part of their own range in due course, but that will not be until after we have sold all the MR models. (CJL) So, early next year then (judging by how quickly they've been selling)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted October 23, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 23, 2016 I'm sorry but Model Rail won't be doing the Meldon pilot. Bachmann required us to take everything we wanted in one go. The 10 variants we selected cover the total production run of some 5,000. It may be that Bachmann will issue USAs as part of their own range in due course, but that will not be until after we have sold all the MR models. (CJL) Thanks dibbs; was tongue in cheek of course. However, any hints on how to get 71 to look like 62 would be excellent. (Yes I know I can renumber it ) Thanks Phil Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold adb968008 Posted October 23, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted October 23, 2016 https://photos.smugmug.com/RAILWAYS/BRITISH-STEAM-LOCOMOTIVES/LOCOMOTIVES-OF-BRITISH-2/i-cRgkkCs/1/XL/30062-XL.jpg 30062 is one of the class with the extended bunker. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dibber25 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 https://photos.smugmug.com/RAILWAYS/BRITISH-STEAM-LOCOMOTIVES/LOCOMOTIVES-OF-BRITISH-2/i-cRgkkCs/1/XL/30062-XL.jpg 30062 is one of the class with the extended bunker. We don't have tooling to do the extended bunker. (CJL) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Ian J. Posted October 23, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 23, 2016 Is the bunker removable or is it an integral part of the cab moulding? Maybe someone could do up a 3D print for it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dibber25 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Is the bunker removable or is it an integral part of the cab moulding? Maybe someone could do up a 3D print for it? It looks to be one piece, integral with the cab. That would be logical because you have either the original cab and bunker or the SR cab and bunker two tools. It might be possible to cut the bunker off and fit a 3D printed bunker but I'm not sure about joining the two different materials. From what I've seen, so far, of 3D printed items, they have some way to go before the surface smoothness will match that of plastic. The SR cab and extended bunker would have required a third tool and it would, I think, be limited to only a couple of locomotives. I asked about doing the Departmental USA allocated to Redbridge Sleeper Depot, but again, it was one that we couldn't cover from the tooling that we had. Similarly, there was one of the 14 SR locomotives by a different builder. That would have required all manner of detail changes and for that reason we excluded it. (CJL) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Hamlin Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 I made my own replacement plate for gaining access to the smokebox. I used the supplied one as a template. So far this is my model of the year and it's out of my normal region! 9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
USA4472 Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 .....The SR cab and extended bunker would have required a third tool and it would, I think, be limited to only a couple of locomotives..... (CJL) Both 30062 and 30073 that had extended bunkers differed. 30062 having a vertical lower part to the bunker and 30073 tapered. HTH. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted October 24, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 24, 2016 (edited) Both 30062 and 30073 that had extended bunkers differed. 30062 having a vertical lower part to the bunker and 30073 tapered. HTH. Most useful HTH; thank you. I believe the bunker comes off easily so that should be a simple mod? Here's '71' pretending to be '62. Just need to try to get a drawing or picture of the 'extended bunker' (or do I just busk it?) Phil Edited for case of absolute failure to read correctly. Edited October 25, 2016 by Mallard60022 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Al51 Posted October 24, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 24, 2016 Most useful HTH; thank you. I believe the bunker comes off easily so that should be a simple mod? USA tank Loco.jpg Here's '71' pretending to be '62. Just need to try to get a drawing or picture of the 'extended bunker' (or do I just busk it?) Phil adb968008 posted a link to a picture in post #734 Al Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted October 25, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 25, 2016 https://photos.smugmug.com/RAILWAYS/BRITISH-STEAM-LOCOMOTIVES/LOCOMOTIVES-OF-BRITISH-2/i-cRgkkCs/1/XL/30062-XL.jpg 30062 is one of the class with the extended bunker. How the #### did I not see that? My apologies. Thanks Phil Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Ian J. Posted November 3, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted November 3, 2016 A post just to add a gratuitously unnecessary picture of my 30067, sitting on my 'workbench': 15 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold NHY 581 Posted November 3, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 3, 2016 How the #### did I not see that? My apologies. Thanks Phil Perhaps ones beak got in the way........ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Popular Post Howl03 Posted November 8, 2016 RMweb Gold Popular Post Share Posted November 8, 2016 Real coal added, accessories fitted, and a bit of extra weathering done to 30071. Regards Paul. 21 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickham Green Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Real coal added, accessories fitted, and a bit of extra weathering done to 30071. IMG_2003.JPGIMG_2004.JPGIMG_2005.JPG Regards Paul. Luvverley loco .......................without wishing to criticise, I wonder if the track might benefit from a teensy-weensy bit of weathering, too, perhaps ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSpencer Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 We don't have tooling to do the extended bunker. (CJL) Maybe this will be the direction Bachmann can take if they decide to release it under their own program in a few years from now. I,d certainly buy a 4th if they did. These models definitely have my vote for model of the year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold phil_sutters Posted November 11, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 11, 2016 (edited) Another useful model for the SDJR fraternity - apparently the US Army used several, when it had a stores operation on Highbridge Wharf in WW2! I am now trying to remember where I saw that - very recently - it's getting a bit like that now I've crossed the 70 mark! OK I've now found the reference - a quote from Pines Express in Chris Handley's excellent - The Maritime Activities of the Somerset & Dorset Railway. Edited November 11, 2016 by phil_sutters 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDJR7F88 Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Another useful model for the SDJR fraternity - apparently the US Army used several, when it had a stores operation on Highbridge Wharf in WW2! I am now trying to remember where I saw that - very recently - it's getting a bit like that now I've crossed the 70 mark! OK I've now found the reference - a quote from Pines Express in Chris Handley's excellent - The Maritime Activities of the Somerset & Dorset Railway. Any picture of what livery or number these would of been on the SDJR? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dibber25 Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Any picture of what livery or number these would of been on the SDJR? Presumably USATC black livery but there were any number of lettering styles for the USATC livery. (CJL) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium TheQ Posted November 14, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted November 14, 2016 Any picture of what livery or number these would of been on the SDJR? 1285, livery would have been standard USTC livery, as it was pre delivery to Europe, Arrived Highbridge 15/1/43. See here http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/71017-usatc-s160-locomotive-in-7mm-scale-well-thats-the-plan/page-2 see well down the thread, posted by "KIngdom". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold phil_sutters Posted November 14, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 14, 2016 (edited) Any picture of what livery or number these would of been on the SDJR? In Chris Handley's note, quoting 'Pines Express - issue 192', he says that a number of War Department locomotives were operated by the US Ordnance during WW2 up to the end of 1944. One was allocated to the wharf, whilst others were used in extensive sidings & depot opposite the loco works. They included USA 0-6-0T nos. WD1255, WD1285,WD1394 & WD1557 along with Sentinel WD70232 & a WD Ruston. No photo & no livery details are given by Chris Handley. Edited November 14, 2016 by phil_sutters Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now