Jump to content
 

Level crossing stupidity...


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold
5 hours ago, newbryford said:

As well as strapping down catering trolleys, we'll be insisting on passengers wearing seatbelts next.

 


after the Ufton nervet crash one of the parents of someone sadly killed there after being thrown from the train was campaigning to get seat belts fitted to passenger trains, obviously the plan never gained any ground 

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4542952.stm

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting rid of level crossings would be a far better idea, perhaps at the very least going back to old style full gated ones with substantial gates... Best to stop the "interface" between vehicle and train of you want to prevent the majority of such incidents. Actually what the RMT have campaigned for in the past, though the cost would be horrendous, in monetary terms anyhow...

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
18 hours ago, Hobby said:

Getting rid of level crossings would be a far better idea, perhaps at the very least going back to old style full gated ones with substantial gates... Best to stop the "interface" between vehicle and train of you want to prevent the majority of such incidents. Actually what the RMT have campaigned for in the past, though the cost would be horrendous, in monetary terms anyhow...

A heavy duty version of those bollards that rise up out of the ground to close off pedestrianised areas in towns might do the trick rather better than gates or barriers.

 

John

  • Like 2
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dunsignalling said:

A heavy duty version of those bollards that rise up out of the ground to close off pedestrianised areas in towns might do the trick rather better than gates or barriers.

 

John

A cheaper idea might  be those sprung steel plates to be found at the entrances to car parks and similar. When a vehicle approaches in the 'right' direction, the plates descend, and sit flush to the road surface. If a vehicle approaches the 'wrong' way, then it encounters the plate at a 45 degree angle.

  • Like 4
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
11 minutes ago, Fat Controller said:

A cheaper idea might  be those sprung steel plates to be found at the entrances to car parks and similar. When a vehicle approaches in the 'right' direction, the plates descend, and sit flush to the road surface. If a vehicle approaches the 'wrong' way, then it encounters the plate at a 45 degree angle.

That idea could be used to sort out the zig-zaggers at AHB crossings rather well.

 

John

  • Agree 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

 

2 hours ago, Dunsignalling said:

A heavy duty version of those bollards that rise up out of the ground to close off pedestrianised areas in towns might do the trick rather better than gates or barriers.

 

John

They have those fitted to a bus only lane in East Ham, London. A few times car drivers have tried to sneak through behind a bus. It was happening so often that they had a platform lorry with a Hi-ab standing by. Invariably the cars were so badly damaged that they were written off.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Fat Controller said:

A cheaper idea might  be those sprung steel plates to be found at the entrances to car parks and similar. When a vehicle approaches in the 'right' direction, the plates descend, and sit flush to the road surface. If a vehicle approaches the 'wrong' way, then it encounters the plate at a 45 degree angle.

Good way of stopping boy racers in the six-foot.  The approaching train should finish the job properly.

  • Like 3
  • Funny 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Not a level crossing matter, but those shunters in the American video are interesting. At least one looked brand new and several had what may have been a Spanish name on the side. I wonder if they were being delivered rather than hauling the train.

Jonathan

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, corneliuslundie said:

Not a level crossing matter, but those shunters in the American video are interesting. At least one looked brand new and several had what may have been a Spanish name on the side. I wonder if they were being delivered rather than hauling the train.

Jonathan

More likely a positioning move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the parents  are riding for a fall there?

 

Imagine, if you will, in 20 years time, when the child has seriously fallen out with parent?

 

This photo  album will definately be used as evidence Mum tried to off her offspring using a train to do the job, when they were little...

 

Imagine in 10 years time, when said child decides to phone childline cos it cannot get its way?.....This photo will be used, etcc....

Mum seems blissfully unaware of what may lie just around the corner of life....

  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Funny 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, alastairq said:

I think the parents  are riding for a fall there?

 

Imagine, if you will, in 20 years time, when the child has seriously fallen out with parent?

 

This photo  album will definately be used as evidence Mum tried to off her offspring using a train to do the job, when they were little...

 

Imagine in 10 years time, when said child decides to phone childline cos it cannot get its way?.....This photo will be used, etcc....

Mum seems blissfully unaware of what may lie just around the corner of life....

 

Clearly Mum lacked in the full quota of courses in Parental Training...

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, jcredfer said:

 

Clearly Mum lacked in the full quota of courses in Parental Training...

 

 

I think the expression is 'passed the practical but failed the theory...', to paraphrase a line from a Terry Pratchett book

  • Like 1
  • Funny 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 21/06/2021 at 16:40, Dunsignalling said:

A heavy duty version of those bollards that rise up out of the ground to close off pedestrianised areas in towns might do the trick rather better than gates or barriers.

 

John

They used to have them on Burton High Street but the road was forever blocked by cars with bollards through their sumps so they have been removed!

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bill Radford said:

They used to have them on Burton High Street but the road was forever blocked by cars with bollards through their sumps so they have been removed!

 

I'd have thought that was a good reason for installing more. To get more idiot drivers and their cars off the road.

;-)

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 8
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bill Radford said:

They used to have them on Burton High Street but the road was forever blocked by cars with bollards through their sumps so they have been removed!

 

Are these ones in Manchester still in place?

 

 

(Have to say I can't help agreeing with the comment from Dave Crupel six months ago*.)

 

3 hours ago, grahame said:

I'd have thought that was a good reason for installing more.

 

Indeed.

 

1 hour ago, laurenceb said:

The excuse was that they didn't see the signs

 

That's the reason they did what they - it doesn't really excuse it.  As they hopefully found out soon afterwards when the fines & bills started appearing on their door mat.

 

* As of the date I watched the video clip.

  • Agree 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...