RMweb Gold Metr0Land Posted December 12, 2020 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 12, 2020 1 hour ago, boxbrownie said: I always heard the Constellation was a aircraft designers wet dream rather than honed in a wind tunnel hence the odd fuselage shape and extra tail planes. I always understood the tail design was driven by the need to have sufficient control surface/s and fit within the hangars of the day, though I've never ever seen a sketch or drawing of what the aircraft would have looked like with a single large tail. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Smith Posted December 12, 2020 Share Posted December 12, 2020 Just to get some terminology correct, the tailplane generally refers to the horizontal stabilizer, the fin is the vertical stabilizer and the whole assembly is the empennage, or just the tail assembly. There were plenty of aircraft in service at the same time as the Constellation with taller fins. The fuselage must have been more expensive than a regular constant diameter fuselage to produce..... 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post brian daniels Posted December 12, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 12, 2020 Passed Fairford earlier this week just as this U2 was taking off to do circuits and bumps, bit lucky. 20 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium boxbrownie Posted December 12, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 12, 2020 Lucky devil you....... 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted December 12, 2020 Share Posted December 12, 2020 8 hours ago, boxbrownie said: I always heard the Constellation was a aircraft designers wet dream rather than honed in a wind tunnel hence the odd fuselage shape and extra tail planes. If that’s their wet dream, I wonder what their nightmares look like . 1 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted December 12, 2020 Share Posted December 12, 2020 1 hour ago, brian daniels said: Passed Fairford earlier this week just as this U2 was taking off to do circuits and bumps, bit lucky. Nice, I’ve seen them do that a few times, as my cycle route takes me onto the nearest A419 bridge. Fairford will be getting a lot busier soon when they base permanently some RC135 ( I think ) , electronic intelligence aircraft - if that plan has survived covid 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Smith Posted December 12, 2020 Share Posted December 12, 2020 Re the U2 pics, in certain countries you would have been arrested and confined for taking and publishing pics like those - there's a lot to be said for freedom in the West...... 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold big jim Posted December 13, 2020 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 13, 2020 There had got to be more wheels on it than that surely? 1 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium 5944 Posted December 13, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 13, 2020 Saturday morning was spent being suitably deafened by this beauty... 13 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 6 hours ago, big jim said: There had got to be more wheels on it than that surely? It lands on the centre front and rear wheels, if it’s coming to a stop folk drive along side and then run out and attach out rigger wheels. presumably for circuits , it touches briefly and goes , before any wingtip gets near the ground . must be a nightmare in a crosswind , and I’d assume the book crosswind limit is pretty low . 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johann Marsbar Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 5 minutes ago, rob D2 said: It lands on the centre front and rear wheels, if it’s coming to a stop folk drive along side and then run out and attach out rigger wheels. presumably for circuits , it touches briefly and goes , before any wingtip gets near the ground . must be a nightmare in a crosswind , and I’d assume the book crosswind limit is pretty low . Some taken in April 1997 at Beale AFB in California. Overflight before landing... Same aircraft taxying in to the apron - with outriggers attached... Two seater version.... They were rather more relaxed regarding photography there than I was expecting, given the ongoing conflict in the Balkans at that time where the U2's were being deployed. Our tour group was only discouraged from taking close up shots, though we even got the opportunity to sit in the cockpit of one if we wanted! Even more interesting was that the tour included being shown the high altitude flight suits used and their operation. One of the group members was handed a space style helmet to hold and advised not to drop it as it cost something ludicrous like $300K !! The USAF tour guide seemed more bemused when I asked him if the tour bus could stop for me to take a photo of this though.... 16 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 I’ve seen in the inter web that 10 kts is the crosswind limit ? That’s not a lot , so I’d imagine ideally based at somewhere where the runways always into wind 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Metr0Land Posted December 13, 2020 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 13, 2020 There's an episode of Mythbusters where the lucky devil gets to fly in a 2-seat U2. He had to spend a week in training learning how to use the flying suit (plus other tests). I think the myth they were exploring was that it's the world's most difficult aircraft to fly. I think the episode's online as it also explains the odd landing gear (basically doing everything in to save weight). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium boxbrownie Posted December 13, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 13, 2020 14 hours ago, rob D2 said: If that’s their wet dream, I wonder what their nightmares look like . Well aircraft designers have little to express their flare with, a tin tube with a couple of sheets sticking out.....oh yes I know......where shall we put the smaller tubes? 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Sidecar Racer Posted December 13, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 13, 2020 4 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 2 hours ago, Metr0Land said: There's an episode of Mythbusters where the lucky devil gets to fly in a 2-seat U2. He had to spend a week in training learning how to use the flying suit (plus other tests). I think the myth they were exploring was that it's the world's most difficult aircraft to fly. I think the episode's online as it also explains the odd landing gear (basically doing everything in to save weight). One of the more difficult to land , probably east to fly as a jet powered subsonic glider . saw an interview with a USAF U2 pilot on YT and his background was on transports , so you don’t need to be a top gun or test pilot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Bell Posted December 13, 2020 Share Posted December 13, 2020 I found a couple more from Goodwood 6 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Popular Post Metr0Land Posted December 13, 2020 RMweb Gold Popular Post Share Posted December 13, 2020 As we seem to have gravitated towards the black arts, herewith the best ever Black Friday. I've only ever seen one SR71 flying and that was arrivals day at Greenham Common July 1983. She did 2 passes and they were LOUD. I couldn't get there in time for the depature the following Monday 18 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sb67 Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 Love the U2 pictures, that is one amazing plane! I remember being so enthralled watching the James May programme about it, great stuff! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Kris Posted December 14, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 14, 2020 Saw an Airbus Beluga XL flying around Newquay this afternoon. No photos from me as I was a little too far away. https://www.cornwalllive.com/news/cornwall-news/super-transporter-cargo-plane-airbus-4796537 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium 5944 Posted December 14, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 14, 2020 2 hours ago, Kris said: Saw an Airbus Beluga XL flying around Newquay this afternoon. No photos from me as I was a little too far away. https://www.cornwalllive.com/news/cornwall-news/super-transporter-cargo-plane-airbus-4796537 Last I saw it had made 9 missed approaches at the airport! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium PMP Posted December 14, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 14, 2020 3 hours ago, 5944 said: Last I saw it had made 9 missed approaches at the airport! Almost certainly crew training. Newquay is one of the few airports in the uk that accommodate either circuit or multiple instrument approaches. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium J. S. Bach Posted December 15, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 15, 2020 (edited) In the U. S. Navy, we called them "touch-n-go". Real fun watching them shoot touch-n-goes off a carrier! Edited December 15, 2020 by J. S. Bach Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Pelham Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 9 hours ago, J. S. Bach said: In the U. S. Navy, we called them "touch-n-go". Real fun watching them shoot touch-n-goes off a carrier! "Touch-n-go" involves rubber contacting tarmac; with missed approaches there's no contact with the ground. Missed approaches are more commonly known as "Go Arounds", but missed approach is the correct term. I believe Newquay is quite popular for crosswind landing (or just approach in this case) training, a bit like Shannon. Cheers, Mark 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium St Enodoc Posted December 15, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, Mark Pelham said: "Touch-n-go" involves rubber contacting tarmac; with missed approaches there's no contact with the ground. Missed approaches are more commonly known as "Go Arounds", but missed approach is the correct term. I believe Newquay is quite popular for crosswind landing (or just approach in this case) training, a bit like Shannon. Cheers, Mark When I was learning to fly (admittedly nearly 40 years ago) a "go-around" was intentional whereas a "missed approach" was unintentional. "Touch-and-goes" were avoided at some aerodromes that regarded them as landings (brief) and charged a landing fee for each one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now