Jump to content
 

Ladmanlow Sidings and other C&HPR locations


Alister_G
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi Al.

just done that to my J94s.

be careful 12 and13 had the removed when they had the later crest. 6,30,34,79 kept them I think 68 Kept it’s steps but have not seen a clear photo of it to say conclusively.I will try to post some pics later.

cheers Malc.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, malc60015 said:

Hi Al.

just done that to my J94s.

be careful 12 and13 had the removed when they had the later crest. 6,30,34,79 kept them I think 68 Kept it’s steps but have not seen a clear photo of it to say conclusively.I will try to post some pics later.

cheers Malc.

 

1 hour ago, malc60015 said:

Also 68068 retained round buffers and extended bunker which makes it more likely to have kept the steps. Cheers Malc 

 

 

Oh that's great Malc, thank you very much for that.

 

Al.

  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
3 hours ago, malc60015 said:

Hi Al

pics of my fleet of J94s.

Cheers MalcIMG_1592.JPG.6809fd343b20cbd1a19d286b2a740b86.JPGDSC_1515.JPG.c360195b638a4fdc08c09e4c2c1e3682.JPGDSC_1516.JPG.02d60b696483b2c15ae0b67df18f8cd3.JPGDSC_1517.JPG.a84ab6bdd93eb4911102c758971e4141.JPG

 

Very nice, looks just like Rowsley Yard on a bad Saturday... :D

 

I can see the seams on the saddle tank which suggest most of those are Dapol / Hornby bodied, is that right?

 

Al.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The original plan(40 years ago) was to be a retirement project of Rowsley shed 1958-1964 so I started collecting loco’s. 33 years later when retirement came I then realised the size would be prohibitive.

So I now have a tail chaser plus sidings, engine shed and station.  Then DCC came along and the challenge of converting airfix,mainline,Lima and Hornby stock commenced. I am about 66% through this with only a couple of disasters. It is all based on what I used to see when sat on the gate at South Jct box.

Happy days gone but not forgotten.

 

Al sorry for the hi-jack.

cheers Malc 

p.s. All j94 are Dapol purchased when they were first released, there is only 68068 that has the wrong cab backplate (wrong shape rear spectacles) all run very well.

Edited by malc60015
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a similar problem with the old GWR Dean Goods models.

 

How do you find the 4Fs run? All mine needed was a clean and oiling, it's never going to be the standard of (some) current models, but it generally behaves, it must be about forty years old now.

 

 

 

Edited by MrWolf
  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
On 24/02/2022 at 00:57, malc60015 said:

Al sorry for the hi-jack.

 

No problem

 

On 24/02/2022 at 01:44, MrWolf said:

How do you find the 4Fs run? All mine needed was a clean and oiling, it's never going to be the standard of (some) current models, but it generally behaves, it must be about forty years old now.

 

 

I too have a number of the Airfix 4Fs from when I was modelling Bakewell, I found they ran well, if very noisy.

 

 

layout-views013.jpg.572f87f62fd3738ad0c4401e7254eb1d.jpg

 

layout-views006.jpg.7b6dcc794eb478d794a092d0d6d9c0fe.jpg

 

 

Al.

Edited by Alister_G
replaced images
  • Like 15
Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't want to thread hog, so I posted a picture of my 4F up on the Aston thread, just to show that it exists!

Seeing that you have a 4F addiction, I don't feel guilty.

 

IMG_20220224_020258.jpg.6698e5a0a46d388d42aa1fe499a79fb7.jpg

 

Long may they run, even if they do sound like a blender full of masonry nails...

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MrWolf said:

I have a similar problem with the old GWR Dean Goods models.

 

How do you find the 4Fs run? All mine needed was a clean and oiling, it's never going to be the standard of (some) current models, but it generally behaves, it must be about forty years old now.

 

 

 

Hi I find with a Zimo mx600 and lais 870007 they run as well as most newer models.some are noisey but can run extremely slowly. You see a lot of comments on the forum from some sources condemning old models, they obviously don’t like a challenge.:scratchhead:

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, malc60015 said:

Hi I find with a Zimo mx600 and lais 870007 they run as well as most newer models.some are noisey but can run extremely slowly. You see a lot of comments on the forum from some sources condemning old models, they obviously don’t like a challenge.:scratchhead:

 

I'm still running DC in deference (mostly to my wallet!) as I have a lot of older locos.

I don't worry too much about those who insist that new has to be better, my daily transport is 73 years old this August!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
5 hours ago, MrWolf said:

 

No, this:

 

IMG_20210611_141802.jpg.a7d16fad3a1c67baf2bbd17d8e28aa97.jpg

 

 

I've bleated about this before but we really need someone to start producing 3D prints of these and other bikes of the 40s/50s and 60s. 

 

Nothing stunning just bikes typical of the era. Villiers powered lightweights, 350/500 singles, 650 twins. And some suitable sidecars as well though they are of course the devils work.............

 

 

Rob

  • Agree 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
On 24/02/2022 at 09:20, malc60015 said:

You see a lot of comments on the forum from some sources condemning old models, they obviously don’t like a challenge.

 

One of the things that came out of the Doncaster show, (sorry to keep harping on about it) was how many modellers were surprised at the running capabilities of my J94s, nearly all of which are Dapol, I think one is a later Hornby, and one a DJM.

 

They will run slowly, smoothly and quietly, if you treat them right. I have found that using paper shims to slightly adjust the location of the motor and worm-drive in the chassis can make a big difference.

 

The mounting of the motor is not exactly precise - there's just a keeper plate screwed down at each end:

 

ladmanlow640.jpg.5b5ab18e3d36c092b69a3e987af49d78.jpg

 

 

ladmanlow646.jpg.4a60e6850a08fe0f03a799ff3d3cc98b.jpg

 

 

 

Al.

Edited by Alister_G
replaced images
  • Like 4
  • Informative/Useful 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, NHY 581 said:

 

 

I've bleated about this before but we really need someone to start producing 3D prints of these and other bikes of the 40s/50s and 60s. 

 

Nothing stunning just bikes typical of the era. Villiers powered lightweights, 350/500 singles, 650 twins. And some suitable sidecars as well though they are of course the devils work.............

 

 

Rob

I nagged Alan (Modelu) about this just a couple of days ago!

 

Jay

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
44 minutes ago, JustinDean said:

I nagged Alan (Modelu) about this just a couple of days ago!

 

Jay

 

I've also mentioned this to him some time ago. Offered to put him in contact with owners of suitable subjects.....

 

Rob. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NHY 581 said:

 

 

I've bleated about this before but we really need someone to start producing 3D prints of these and other bikes of the 40s/50s and 60s. 

 

Nothing stunning just bikes typical of the era. Villiers powered lightweights, 350/500 singles, 650 twins. And some suitable sidecars as well though they are of course the devils work.............

 

 

Rob

 

I've often thought the same thing. What few 4mm scale motorcycles are available are not that great and rather dated models.

It would certainly be worthwhile a company making several types, even if they were a little generic, as at this size they do look quite similar.

They would also have a broad appeal because many lasted at least three decades in regular service.

If we break things down enough, there's three obvious stages in the visual appearance of a motorcycle.

 

c1905 - c1930, the "flat tank".

 

220px-Norton_16_H_(490_cc)_1921.jpg.a5576b95dfa4d497b0e5dcaf21e61a20.jpg

 

c1929 - c1952, the "saddle tank".

 

d58d9803ceb5bb4565fba1959aff9fbf.JPG.d3fc1ff479dc69c4bfc53881b8875e15.JPG

 

c1953 - c1980, the "swinging arm" frame.

 

motorbike264777(0).jpg.70b609266af4335c1fa312c6c1ac317d.jpg

 

The lightweight machines, such as the BSA Bantam, James Cadet, Excelsior Consort were generally scaled down versions of whatever style was current.

 

 

  • Like 6
  • Agree 2
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...