Jump to content
 

The non-railway and non-modelling social zone. Please ensure forum rules are adhered to in this area too!

Formula 1, 2020


Andrew P
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, Andrew P said:

And maybe, because they wont sign up to the Concorde agreement?:no:

 

Moves like this are more likely to make them less likely to sign.

 

It's akin to the FIA taking their ball back from Merc and then the FIA themselves puncturing it before handing it back. But also giving a new ball to the other teams.

  • Like 3
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

There will be a big credibility problem for F1 should the rumoured possibility of Mercedes withdrawing from the Formula come to pass. Even worse, should that include their engine programme supplying other teams. 

 

F1 touts itself as the pinnacle of motorsport, but, minus Mercedes, it would be clear to all that the top had been lopped off that pinnacle. Rather like switching on Top-Of-The Pops and discovering the chart starts at No.2....  

 

The only real answer to long domination by one constructor is for others to get better. Whilst the owners of F1 devise ways to bring the Merc down to Ferrari's level, several others are gradually improving. Even if it often seems to need Mercedes power units to do it....

 

Unfortunately, consecutive owners/promoters have considered Ferrari pivotal to F1's fortunes. However, "No Show Without Punch" only holds good when they are No.1 or No.2 in the hierarchy, not No.4 (on a good day) as at present. With Ferrari having confessed there is little prospect of anything better until the season after next, maybe it's time for Liberty to fix their eyes on other balls that do have a bit of bounce in them.

 

John

Edited by Dunsignalling
  • Like 3
  • Agree 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I've never understood why Ferrari are said to have so much relevance to F1, and why some believe that their presence is necessary for F1 to continue. They've been absent from the front as often as they've been present, they have little relevance for the man on the street (particularly versus Mercedes/Renault).

  • Agree 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
34 minutes ago, njee20 said:

I've never understood why Ferrari are said to have so much relevance to F1, and why some believe that their presence is necessary for F1 to continue. They've been absent from the front as often as they've been present, they have little relevance for the man on the street (particularly versus Mercedes/Renault).

 

Nor me, many great teams have come and gone and yet F1 still continues. It would be none the worse for having Ferarri disappear.

  • Agree 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue with trying to catch up to Mercedes is how long it takes to filter in new parts (besides the standard season long updates) and the restrictions on how many and what you can update. George Donaldson, former team boss at Toyota, Mitsubishi, Subaru world rally teams said as much on a recent podcast from Dirtfish. His opinion was that to attract manufacturers, improve development and catch a dominant team you need a 6 month cycle on changes, not 3 years.

The podcast is is called Spin The Rally Pod, and is an entertaining and informed listen from those close to the sport

 

 

Jo

  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I think Ferrari is seen as a brand, of the very sort that Liberty perceives 'fits' with its F1 image, thus attracting other premium brands as sponsors, and quality retailers in the F1 shopping circus. F1's aura needs to ooze opulence and a general atmosphere of high-living. I believe the demographic of the fans is a million miles from this, but of course the hospitality units are filled with guests who are happy to be wined and dined in such surroundings. Deb's experience as a corporate guest at Silverstone 30 years ago suggests such people might watch the start but will have no interest in the progress of the race. She watched every lap of course, as you would expect of someone who'd watched Clark and Hill in her early youth. 

  • Like 2
  • Agree 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I know a couple of people who are ardent Ferrari fans, drivers etc don’t matter just Ferrari. Neither of them is likely ever to own one of their cars but they have a lot of models of them. 
Like Ian says it’s a hugely powerful brand that brings a lot of money in by the rich, corporate association and bums on seats from the ardent fans. 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

If Ferrari were not there a lot of rich people own and drive Mercedes anyway.  I think it is not the names on the cars it will be the quality of the races that decides what survives. After all sail for example is an outmoded method of propulsion commercially but there are millions of yachts in the world both racing and cruising.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Jol Wilkinson said:

FIA to restrict down force for safety reasons and engine "quali" mode to be banned, starting at the Begian GP (from the Autosport website). The latter is more complicated than the headline, as teams will have to run the same mode in qualification and the race, which apparently means the engines can't be turned down for reliability.

"A single mode will not only restrict performance in qualifying, but will also limit adjustments drivers make during races, including those when they "turn down" the engine for reliability purposes."

 

Don't they change the rules each year to restrict downforce anyway? Narrower wings, no ground effects.... Teams usually claw this back with changes in other areas. We regularly her that radical changes will be introduced to do this & allow cars to follow each other more closely, but it doesn't seem to happen.

 

No engine mode changes? Everyone uses variable engine modes so they will all need to be turned down all the time or up all the time & fail more frequently.

I agree that this seems like an anti-Mercedes reaction. History has proven that each team has their period on the top perch before someone knocks them off. There always have been moans when any team dominates. When Vettel won his 4 titles with RB, it was up to somebody else to beat them..which Mercedes did by working hard on the next generation of cars.

I remember success ballast being used in touring cars & felt it was rather cruel to handicap teams who did a better job then others.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
6 minutes ago, Pete the Elaner said:

remember success ballast being used in touring cars & felt it was rather cruel to handicap teams who did a better job then others.

That’s why there was the disagreement over reverse grids etc. The drivers and teams want pure racing but the media and probably the majority of viewers want spectacle. We remember the dramatic stuff and it’s good for advertising. F1 will always walk the line between publicity and sport. 
Lewis and Toto have said much of their success is down to a compromise that lets Lewis do his own thing that many would consider a distraction from the sport, doesn’t seem to have hurt giving him the leeway and we are seeing the new group of younger drivers getting more freedom in their media image too. Lando is being held up as the example but it was Lewis who proved it can work ;) 

  • Like 4
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
6 minutes ago, Andrew P said:

This is getting so silly, it needs cutting in the bud NOW.

https://www.espn.co.uk/f1/story/_/id/29660624/renault-calls-racing-point-disqualified-races


Agreed - if Renault can’t beat people in the race...

 

Great for their image - car doesn’t go fast but whines and moans a treat.

 

Cheers

 

Darius

  • Agree 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Darius43 said:


Agreed - if Renault can’t beat people in the race...

 

Great for their image - car doesn’t go fast but whines and moans a treat.

 

Cheers

 

Darius

Renault must be getting ready for the Great Moaner, Alonso's return.:no:

  • Funny 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that I'd want to dance on anyone, but Vettel qualified in P11, despite getting a new chassis.  Looks like he should be "considering his position", perhaps thinking about "spending more time with his family"?

 

Perhaps Ferrari might resurrect an old Roman tradition. Have they a gladius at the back of the garage?

 

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...