Jump to content
 

More model ideas


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold
8 minutes ago, Combe Martin said:

Mmmm ... the only problem with the Southern ones is that compared to the 'big two' there were a 'fraction' of them, and even fewer of the LNER ones.

But in BR days all were to be seen all over the country.

 

Only in the case of United Dairies/Unigate on the Western Region was there anything resembling a monoculture, getting on for 90% ex-GWR by my reckoning, whereas ex-GWR vehicles were less common in the other major fleet, that of Express Dairy.

 

It is, though, somewhat misleading to ascribe milk tanks to individual railways, who only owned the underframes; the tanks themselves were the property of the dairy companies.    

 

John

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Exactly.  During my time as a Canton guard in the 70s I don't think I saw any underframes other than the 6-wheel GW design, our milk train being the Whitland-Kensington.  One of my link jobs was to deliver the empties and pick up loadeds from Marshfield, between Cardiff and Newport.  A Hymek job, initially this meant propelling the loaded tanks back to Cardiff from Marshfield, which was fun, but later, 1972 IIRC, the trailing xover at Marshfield was taken out and we took the tanks to Newport to run around before running them back to Cardiff to be attached to the up milk in the evening.

 

Marshfield was accessed by a ground frame, which I liked, a chance to exercise my frustrated inner signalman...  I was the guard on the xover removal train, which involved taking the Radyr PAD 35ton Smith-Rodley (think Airfix kit with a solid 8-wheel underframe, self-propelled) and some Grampus out to the site, shutting the loco down and putting the handbrake on, and getting locked in to the Port'o'Call pub while the boys got on with it.  We finished up in there about 2am, and all climbed aboard my van which had a good stove fire going, and 'rested our eyes' until the Workabust turned up at about 6 o'clock with our relief.  Hell, but somebody had to do it, and on Sunday overtime rates as well; shame to take the money, really, not that I ever gave any of it back...

 

The dairy was a few hundred yards up the road and the milk was brought down in road tankers to be loaded on to the Miltas.  They stank, btw; the glass-lined insides might have been spotlessly steam-cleaned but the outsides were covered in stale milkspill, and I have always avoided modelling them because of the association.  But I agree; the old Lima model was good in it's day but is showing it's age now and doesn't cut the mustard any more.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Dunsignalling said:

But in BR days all were to be seen all over the country.

 

Only in the case of United Dairies/Unigate on the Western Region was there anything resembling a monoculture, getting on for 90% ex-GWR by my reckoning, whereas ex-GWR vehicles were less common in the other major fleet, that of Express Dairy.

 

It is, though, somewhat misleading to ascribe milk tanks to individual railways, who only owned the underframes; the tanks themselves were the property of the dairy companies.    

 

John

 

Yes, in BR days a tanker from any of the fleets could wander, whether many did or not is another matter, but certainly tankers from all of the ex big 4 could go anywhere.

 

I'm not qualified to comment on how much of the Unigate fleet when used on the WR was ex GWR as I wasnt there, though it dosnt sound unreasonable, but I can say that of the ex-GWR/BR fleet (BR built tankers were the GWR design) about 70% were Unigate and about 30% Express Dairies.  With the ex-LMS fleet the proportions were almost the same.

 

What I've been getting at when referring to (for example) an ex GWR vehicle is that you could produce just one ex-GWR/BR underframe and fit it with several different Unigate 'tank tops' and several different diagram Express Dairy 'tank tops', though these all look very similar.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Combe Martin said:

 

 

What I've been getting at when referring to (for example) an ex GWR vehicle is that you could produce just one ex-GWR/BR underframe and fit it with several different Unigate 'tank tops' and several different diagram Express Dairy 'tank tops', though these all look very similar.  

Don't overlook those with the filler at an extreme end https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/ef46a832d  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/e3d9c41c5 or twin fillers https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/e30d8d2a3 and the 2000 gallon (small) tanks https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/e18c46993  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/e19911708

 

And there are lots of engineers repaints, rebuilds etc that could be modelled. 

 

And even the late rebuilds which were rarely used https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/e3313a90e

 

Paul

https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, hmrspaul said:

Don't overlook those with the filler at an extreme end https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/ef46a832d  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/e3d9c41c5 or twin fillers https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/e30d8d2a3 and the 2000 gallon (small) tanks https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/e18c46993  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/e19911708

 

And there are lots of engineers repaints, rebuilds etc that could be modelled. 

 

And even the late rebuilds which were rarely used https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks/e3313a90e

 

Paul

https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmilktanks

 

That's a good point, I had been thinking that these only had a modelling life up to maybe the mid 70's (for milk), but engineers use extends that into the 'modern era'

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Combe Martin said:

 

That's a good point, I had been thinking that these only had a modelling life up to maybe the mid 70's (for milk), but engineers use extends that into the 'modern era'

Mid 1970s is premature. We have discussed milk traffic extensively on RMWeb and persisted into 1980. 

 

Paul

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

So, just over one day until the next Irish announcement.

Whilst hoping for an 80 Class, I expect it'll be a wagon to add to the fleet of Bulleid based stock they have been turning out.  Did Bulleid design any milk tankers for CIE?  A mix of the grain wagons recently announced with some milk tanks on the back would sort out breakfast nicely.

  • Round of applause 1
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, hmrspaul said:

Mid 1970s is premature. We have discussed milk traffic extensively on RMWeb and persisted into 1980. 

 

Paul

 

Certainly as far as the WR was concerned, it was not until road improvements carried fast dual carriageways into Darkest Dyfed, Devon beyond Exeter, and Cornwall, that long distance road haulage became viable to replace the rail service.  I imagine similar conditions existed elsewhere.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Making Air-Con Mk2s would bring more opportunities to make overseas models as well, such as the New Zealand Mk2s and the Taiwanese EMU100. The 'compromise' 1:76.2 scale would carry over to them, though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • RMweb Gold
10 minutes ago, WCML100 said:

image.png.7f2764057d7ccd817fb1bf01c9c4a6e5.png
 

let the guessing commence… my money is on a rerun of the cutdown HYA in the new liveries as well as some re runs of the HYA/IIA.  
 

 

As an Rmweb exclusive, it’s not a rerun of anything. ;)

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Round of applause 1
  • Funny 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
9 hours ago, PieGuyRob said:

I also want to say class 59, also, possibly class 58? But, if it is an RMWEB exclusive, it is probably a wagon....

 

But, fingers crossed for a class 40.

 

It's not an RMweb exclusive product - we just confirmed, exclusively on RMweb it is a new tooling :) 

Edited by McC
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
10 hours ago, XChris said:

My money is on the HEA or MEA. Uses existing tooling from the HAA’s and they did both coal and aggregate work…

 

What tooling would it use? The chassis are completely different. 

  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, newbryford said:

 

What tooling would it use? The chassis are completely different. 


ahh yes my apologies, getting my 4 wheeled wagons mixed up. Can’t say I ever spent too long looking at them.

 

It’ll be interesting to see what is announced non the less

Edited by XChris
Additional sentence
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...