Jump to content
Users will currently see a stripped down version of the site until an advertising issue is fixed. If you are seeing any suspect adverts please go to the bottom of the page and click on Themes and select IPS Default. ×
RMweb
 

Unusual and interesting coaches on Flickr


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold
16 minutes ago, Wickham Green too said:

Another Sleeping Car that made it into preservation but has since made it into razor blades or bean cans. ☹️

 

Was that the North Norfolk one? I used to stay in one there was absolutely rancid. Was also full of blue asbestos so had no chance sadly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So eight dia 2169 made it into preservation, three have gone in the last two years leaving only one left - but for how long.

 

603 - Scrapped Bluebell 12/2022

612 - Scrapped Butterley by 5/2010

615 - Scrapped 10/1992

617 - Congleton?

621 - Scrapped Ecclesbourne Valley, 11/2021

622 - Scrapped Bo'ness 2006

623 - Scrapped Bluebell 12/2022

624 - Scrapped North Norfolk 1997

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Wickham Green too said:

... and, without checking, the twelve-wheelers probably not much better. 


One of the 12 wheeler (LMS 380 Sleeper 1st) is heavily modified & static on disconnected rails in a campsite next to Lincolnshire Wolds Ludborough. 
 

No easy access to photograph now. 
 

I recall a rumour that was run up and down line on arrival to ensure no lumps or dust of an unpleasant nature occurred following earlier removal of asbestos. 

Edited by DOCJACOB
Extra info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Wickham Green too said:

http://www.cs.rhrp.org.uk/se/CarriageInfo.asp?Ref=4 ..... "no immediate importance" ( unless it becomes the only survivor )

If you search that site for "Type SLF"  a good number of sleepers come up, but looking at the first couple the heritage railways don't care much for them. Some sad sights. 

 

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
18 hours ago, Flood said:

A very subtle one here:

 

50008* n

 

The second sleeper from the left (3rd coach from the left) isn't a Mk1. It's W624M, an LMS design dia 2169, in it's last year of service. Below is a photo of the same coach before it moved to the Western  Region:

c.1970 - Wolverton Works, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire.

 

Strange there is no model

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 10/07/2023 at 17:34, montyburns56 said:

 

11 Coach  (Fleetwood Shawe)011

 

 

A couple of interesting wagons too. 

 

The carriage is evidently a retired all first and presumably originally six-wheeled? Looks to me to be of NER origin, an opinion assisted by the van looking very much like a NER G1.

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 20/08/2023 at 11:33, hmrspaul said:

If you search that site for "Type SLF"  a good number of sleepers come up, but looking at the first couple the heritage railways don't care much for them. Some sad sights. 

 

Paul

 

The problem is they're not revenue earning stock for a preserved railway. Most preserved railways operate on very tight funds and have little if any money spare. Unless there's a special fund setup specifically for restoring a sleeper coach they're likely to languish. Unfortunate, but that's the way of things. And they're not 'glamorous' like a steam engine, so don't attract as many people willing to restore them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
27 minutes ago, nightstar.train said:

 

The problem is they're not revenue earning stock for a preserved railway. Most preserved railways operate on very tight funds and have little if any money spare. Unless there's a special fund setup specifically for restoring a sleeper coach they're likely to languish. Unfortunate, but that's the way of things. And they're not 'glamorous' like a steam engine, so don't attract as many people willing to restore them. 

 

Whilst I'm not saying it's financially viable necessarily, although considering the cost of sleeping equipment it might be a cheaper option, but due to their traditional construction there's a possibility they could be rebuilt internally to a more useful configuration, at least the basics of an old coach would be conserved.

 

Mike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...