Jump to content
 

Peterborough North


great northern
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
On 13/01/2022 at 09:41, great northern said:

The C12 has had a bit of the limelight lately, but the poor old N5 has just been ignored, lucky if it is glimpsed in the background. Actually, I'm surprised there haven't been any complaints from a small island just to our west. In the end, someone strolling along Station Road took pity on it.

 

 

756635270_5N5.JPG.e2e07994b87183459975d228caaabe5d.JPG

Another day of lovely sunshine forecast here, so more trains will run later.

 

He hasn't been paying attention, that's the problem!  Just like when he was at school, ho hum.  I promise to sit at the front from now on and watch closely!

  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 02/02/2022 at 08:57, great northern said:

The Birmingham-Ely has pulled away, to be quickly followed by the Up Cleethorpes-KX.

 

 

315625517_161130.JPG.d6b6ab019376ab11dd866a30650b0421.JPG

I love this angle!
Gives the perspective of how large the locos really were.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, great northern said:

Today saw the first visit from Tim for quite a while, but he brought with him plentiful goodies. I don't want anyone getting over excited, so they will be revealed in stages. The first is another V2. There were few of the ones with separate cylinders in the South, so Rails announcement of 60964 in original condition was very welcome, and Tim's next task after 60881, which you saw some time ago. And here it is.

 

 

578542904_2803naturallight.JPG.012d05b8b9b8d3f05bbfe5053c247017.JPG

 

 

333112176_3803left.JPG.f443f02c5f47231ac9b1956362d7c757.JPG

803 was a March engine, and may seem a strange choice, as their V2s spent most of their time on the GN/GE, and as far as York, or occasionally Newcastle. However, on summer weekends some of them were regularly loaned to New England or Kings Cross to help deal with all the extra trains, so it can be justified on that basis. There is a second reason for the choice though. 803 was a very regular choice for the Colchester-Newcastle through train, and I saw it at Lincoln many times, both in black livery and later in green. What's more, I have a memory which is confirmed by perusal of one of my early Ian Allans, which not only has it underlined, but a C beside it too. So, yes, I have been in the cab of 803 as it stood at Lincoln around 4.45pm on its way back East, and nostalgia dictated that I should find a reason to have it.

 

The brief to Tim was to give me a loco which was about six months out of shops, but well cared for and kept clean, and as always he has  come up with something special. Unfortunately today was an extremely overcast one, and so exposures of two seconds and more were needed to get this result, which doesn't do justice to the subtlety of Tim's work. I may well show some more images when we get some proper daylight. Again he has dealt with the poor fit of the smokebox door, and added another little tweak to get even closer to the real thing. I shall leave it to Tim to tell you what it is, and how he did it.

Hi Gilbert, Any further V2 shots. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
7 minutes ago, great northern said:

Time to disclose the second goodie, which is another V2.

 

A really lovely piece of work to create that used but looked after look. I assume these two lovelies are Bachmann? It really illustrates how a truly skilled "painter and decorator" (no office intended and not to mention the skills of the photographer) can transform a ready to run loco.

I shall continue to try and emulate Tim's work to the best of my abilities. Meanwhile I am diverted onto completing (a relative tern I know) my layout "70D" before I return to loco building.

Thanks for the memories of the ECML Gilbert.

 

Kind regards,

 

Richard B

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, great northern said:

Time to disclose the second goodie, which is another V2. This time we have a Kings Cross engine, and one which seems to have been something of a Top Shed pet, as it was very frequently photographed in the late 50s and early 60s, and always in immaculate condition. In particular, it seems to have been a favourite choice fot the Scarborough Flyer, year in, year out. Last time out of the paint shop was March 58, so the KX cleaners could still get this level of cleanliness and shine in August.

 

 

498924857_49831.JPG.8edaede8c5b5e7a1aaf4adc86c68f7dc.JPG

34A had both the first and last of the class, and now so have I.

 

 

726089867_59832.JPG.57b7ce6e87efd3ce526ebdca10d362f9.JPG

 

 

 

Tim's really done the works on these two. You must be delighted. It's certainly caused me to rethink my disappointment with the V2. Thanks for posting

Edited by davidw
Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tim said:

Thanks all!  Below are some photos of these two in the winter sunlight,  which really shows off how gorgeous a shade of green Bachmann have given them. 

 

Firstly 60803....

 

20220130_114428.jpg.6834ac71d8abb59add2ff9d7be497393.jpg

 

20220130_114637.jpg.4bcfc16ebf13212e94ff6a3444eff411.jpg

 

Secondly, 60983....

 

20220201_105922.jpg.c20743bb3a4f092886759a2e75e6d643.jpg

 

20220201_105848.jpg.d0267dbbda414232e6380ffe22e3d71f.jpg

 

Both of these have had their smokebox doors thinned down, which isn't a difficult job to do, in fairness, though my views on this are known and I don't need to repeat them...   I think I may have mentioned before, but no T-Cut was used on either of these, as it will remove the decoration in no time, unlike the vast majority of models from Bachmann. The printing process has clearly changed.....

 

60803 needed the earlier style of valve guide on the front of the cylinders.  As luck would have it, the cylinder mouldings of both this and the interim model are broadly the same, so the fronts were swapped over (there's one of these earlier chassis being fitted under an older body; more anon!).

 

Both locos were tested on class C freights yesterday, so here's 60983 a down working, taken using my tablet.

 

20220203_150726.jpg.7801f503426cd63dc7dcd41ce70fb260.jpg

 

 

Yummy

  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
39 minutes ago, Tim said:

Thanks all!  Below are some photos of these two in the winter sunlight,  which really shows off how gorgeous a shade of green Bachmann have given them. 

 

Firstly 60803....

 

20220130_114428.jpg.6834ac71d8abb59add2ff9d7be497393.jpg

 

20220130_114637.jpg.4bcfc16ebf13212e94ff6a3444eff411.jpg

 

Secondly, 60983....

 

20220201_105922.jpg.c20743bb3a4f092886759a2e75e6d643.jpg

 

20220201_105848.jpg.d0267dbbda414232e6380ffe22e3d71f.jpg

 

Both of these have had their smokebox doors thinned down, which isn't a difficult job to do, in fairness, though my views on this are known and I don't need to repeat them...   I think I may have mentioned before, but no T-Cut was used on either of these, as it will remove the decoration in no time, unlike the vast majority of models from Bachmann. The printing process has clearly changed.....

 

60803 needed the earlier style of valve guide on the front of the cylinders.  As luck would have it, the cylinder mouldings of both this and the interim model are broadly the same, so the fronts were swapped over (there's one of these earlier chassis being fitted under an older body; more anon!).

 

Both locos were tested on class C freights yesterday, so here's 60983 a down working, taken using my tablet.

 

20220203_150726.jpg.7801f503426cd63dc7dcd41ce70fb260.jpg

 

 

You could have given them a clean before giving them to Mr B.

  • Funny 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, great northern said:

Right, I have kept the best for last. Yet another V2, but I really do need a lot of these, especially when it comes to the Saturday timetable. I also have to remember that I still have two original split chassis locos which probably don't have much longer to live, and that one V2 has to spend its time standing doing nothing as main line pilot. Thus, this one will not be the last.

 

I decided that a York engine would be appropriate, there being two KX-Dringhouses Class Cs in the WTT, one of which they would have worked. York's reputation for loco cleanliness was no better than New England's, though whether that was caused by lack of staff as at 34E I don't know. it seems a shame, as Tim pointed out, to cover up this lovely rich green, but the sad truth is that there were far more dirty V2s than clean one like those which you have seen this last couple of days.

 

60961 was the loco I chose, but the only colour photos I could find in my period were posed shots out side Darlington paint shop, and it wouldn't have stayed like that for long. I try to keep pushing Tim a little further with each commission I give him, so I looked for a good photo of an engine in poor external condition as a challenge. I have recently acquired the Great Northern Books publication Gresleys V2s by Peter Tuffrey, and therein I found a very good image of 60889, which I felt would give Tim something to push his talents still further, so I sent that image to him and said "do it like that, please". I've noticed that a number of Doncaster engines had marks that look as though they were caused by priming all along the boiler, presumably caused by the water available there. It is subtle, but noticeable. So, a dirty engine it was to be, and Tim was not to be beaten by the challenge. These photos were taken in poor light conditions, and they don't do Tim's work full justice, but they are enough to show the quality of what he came up with.

 

 

388269841_69611.JPG.df3daef0f13e653d4c7f6e2e0cd558b5.JPG

 

 

282208485_79612.JPG.523386b899a1d1813a05c264d8d5c0fe.JPG

Tim has his own shots taken in full sunlight, and when he posts those you will be able to fully see what he has achieved.

The new V.2's look excellent & 60961 looks a typical York example . York did indeed suffer a continual shortage of cleaners , mainly due to better paid work with more regular hours being available at Rowntree's , Terry's & Cravens sweet factories . What cleaning took place concentrated on the A.1's followed by the A.2/3's . In the high summer , with all the passed cleaners out firing , no cleaning took place at all much of the time .

                                     Ray . 

  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
6 minutes ago, Ray Flintoft said:

The new V.2's look excellent & 60961 looks a typical York example . York did indeed suffer a continual shortage of cleaners , mainly due to better paid work with more regular hours being available at Rowntree's , Terry's & Cravens sweet factories . What cleaning took place concentrated on the A.1's followed by the A.2/3's . In the high summer , with all the passed cleaners out firing , no cleaning took place at all much of the time .

                                     Ray . 

Many thanks, that sorts that little puzzle. The same as at New England then, factories just up the road, with better pay and much better working conditions.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...