ScRSG Posted December 17, 2017 Share Posted December 17, 2017 Isn't that a sorry indictment of the most drawn out introduction of a model in history! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigherb Posted December 17, 2017 Share Posted December 17, 2017 Isn't that a sorry indictment of the most drawn out introduction of a model in history! I think the Kernow Warship may win that prize it was annouced a few months before the 21 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gardenwall Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 I think the Kernow Warship may win that prize it was annouced a few months before the Wrenn (Hornby doublo) announced the Adams Radial decades ago - it would appear in catalogues but took messrs Oxford and Hornby until this year to actually produce one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSpencer Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 Wrenn (Hornby doublo) announced the Adams Radial decades ago - it would appear in catalogues but took messrs Oxford and Hornby until this year to actually produce one. Actually it was last year for Hornby and the year before that for Oxfordrail. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Higgs Posted December 25, 2017 Share Posted December 25, 2017 Wrenn (Hornby doublo) announced the Adams Radial decades ago - it would appear in catalogues but took messrs Oxford and Hornby until this year to actually produce one. Not sure if that counts as it is not really the same manufacturer. But I can remember the N Gauge GWR 2251 in the Peco catalogue when I was a teenager and it took decades for that to become reality. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold adb968008 Posted December 26, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 26, 2017 Isn't that a sorry indictment of the most drawn out introduction of a model in history! Bulleid coaches and the Lord Nelson were tooled up nearly a decade before they appeared on shelves. Of course the Lima V2... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nimbus Posted December 26, 2017 Share Posted December 26, 2017 Of course the Lima V2... A Hornby-Dublo V2 got at least as far as an engineering drawing for the loco body, or 'housing' in H-D terminology. Around 1968, Trix announced a Brush Type 4, which was solely an artists sketch in the catalogue. The Nim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bingley hall Posted December 26, 2017 Share Posted December 26, 2017 Isn't that a sorry indictment of the most drawn out introduction of a model in history! No. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSpencer Posted December 26, 2017 Share Posted December 26, 2017 I remember the Bachmann N class and class 166 taking almost 5 years to appear. The former being retooled from an plastic body to include the Diecast parts after it was found to be light on its feet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andytrains Posted December 27, 2017 Share Posted December 27, 2017 In our desperation for the class 21/29, we are now grumbling on about other types that we never got. Happy New Year Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spackz Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share Posted December 27, 2017 We keep getting new dates so nothings guaranteed but the link below suggests they're close. EP/Tooling examples should hopefully be ready for Ally Pally. https://digest.Dapol.co.uk/forum/main-forum/class-21-29/793-still-looking-for-news/page2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Clive Mortimore Posted December 27, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 27, 2017 We keep getting new dates so nothings guaranteed but the link below suggests they're close. EP/Tooling examples should hopefully be ready for Ally Pally. https://digest.Dapol.co.uk/forum/main-forum/class-21-29/793-still-looking-for-news/page2 A couple of months after another manufacturer announces they are making a class 29. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaddeus Posted December 27, 2017 Share Posted December 27, 2017 A couple of months after another manufacturer announces they are making a class 29. pardon my ignorance, who else is making a class 29? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Clive Mortimore Posted December 27, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 27, 2017 pardon my ignorance, who else is making a class 29? With both Bachmann and Hornby going to be making announcements in just over a weeks time and other manufacturers in February at Nuremberg who knows? Might be none of them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spackz Posted December 27, 2017 Author Share Posted December 27, 2017 I doubt anyone else will announce these now. Dapol have had enough issues and 7 years of development as it is. I have spoken several times to people at Dapol and this project is awaiting expert livery knowledge and Ep's. They are in tooling. They are very close and more information is also close, 4-6 weeks and we may get livery and press order details. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Legend Posted December 27, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 27, 2017 I’d be astonished if anyone introduced a new 21/29 other than Hornby reintroducing their old one in the Railroad Range. But that’s a completely different market. If this is produced to the standard of the 68, and there is no reason to think otherwise, then this will be a corker It still amazes me though that manufacturers are prepared to develop an offbeat diesel loco failure that lasted what 10-12 years , yet there are mainstream Scottish steam locos that lasted 80 years and in several different colour schemes that are not being modelled. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andytrains Posted December 27, 2017 Share Posted December 27, 2017 We keep getting new dates so nothings guaranteed but the link below suggests they're close. EP/Tooling examples should hopefully be ready for Ally Pally. https://digest.Dapol.co.uk/forum/main-forum/class-21-29/793-still-looking-for-news/page2 Ally Pally 2030? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Roy Langridge Posted December 27, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 27, 2017 Ally Pally 2030? How droll. Dapol have said they hope for Ally Pally 2018. Given their recent models are very good, perhaps time to give the sarcasm a break? Roy 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andytrains Posted December 27, 2017 Share Posted December 27, 2017 How droll. Dapol have said they hope for Ally Pally 2018. Given their recent models are very good, perhaps time to give the sarcasm a break? Roy Just a joke. Hope they do appear soon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Covkid Posted December 27, 2017 Share Posted December 27, 2017 It still amazes me though that manufacturers are prepared to develop an offbeat diesel loco failure that lasted what 10-12 years , yet there are mainstream Scottish steam locos that lasted 80 years and in several different colour schemes that are not being modelled. Probably because only a questionable proportion of modellers fancy Scottish teamakers I shouldn't wonder Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold adb968008 Posted December 28, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 28, 2017 (edited) I’d be astonished if anyone introduced a new 21/29 other than Hornby reintroducing their old one in the Railroad Range. But that’s a completely different market. If this is produced to the standard of the 68, and there is no reason to think otherwise, then this will be a corker It still amazes me though that manufacturers are prepared to develop an offbeat diesel loco failure that lasted what 10-12 years , yet there are mainstream Scottish steam locos that lasted 80 years and in several different colour schemes that are not being modelled. Diesels blend better. I can stick a 17 with a 20/24/5/6/7/31/37/40/45/46/47/50 and that’s a Scottish one. I can stick a 33 with 14/5/6/20/24/5/6/7/31/35/37/40/42/3/5/6/7/50/52 That’s lots of national overlap. (Of the above the only odd one I couldn’t place with either was a 44). To represent either geography, I just need to reposition 2-3 locos, even then I can still have an excuse for an off territory visitor. A lot of Scottish steam classes are obscure small fleets, and the few that were preserved aren’t very well represented in preservation and even less ever wandered south of the border, before or after preservation, indeed I think Scottish steam, I think HR103, 673 Maude and Caley 828. I think of Scottish steam in BR days I think A4’s, 2p, 2mt, Black 5’, K1,2,3,4, B1, BR stds, all of which have South of the border links. Maybe I need educating, but i’m Probably not alone. Edited December 28, 2017 by adb968008 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewartingram Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 Probably because only a questionable proportion of modellers fancy Scottish teamakers I shouldn't wonder And the 21 is NOT a Scottish loco. It was introduced onto the ER initally (both GN & GE) Like the 26, 27, they only moved to the ScR later. Stewart Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Reid Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 Err.. Not quite Stuart - Whist D5300-5319 were allocated to 34B from new D5320-5346 and D5347-D5368 went to the ScR from new. For the Class 21's D6138-D6157 went to the ScR from new. Whilst they were not uniquely Scottish they all gravitated to the ScR eventually. The Class 29's stand alone as being uniquely "Scottish"Do we really need to justify why we shouldn't get a "Scottish" engine? There's been some pretty obscure classes and single loco's produced in the last few years. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulG Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 Err.. Not quite Stuart - Whist D5300-5319 were allocated to 34B from new D5320-5346 and D5347-D5368 went to the ScR from new. For the Class 21's D6138-D6157 went to the ScR from new. Whilst they were not uniquely Scottish they all gravitated to the ScR eventually. The Class 29's stand alone as being uniquely "Scottish" Do we really need to justify why we shouldn't get a "Scottish" engine? There's been some pretty obscure classes and single loco's produced in the last few years. Err - unless others know better: When new, D6100-9 were allocated to 34B Hornsey, D6110-9 to 30A Stratford and D6120-37 to 32B Ipswich. D6127 delivered new on 06/10/1959, to Scotland (Eastfield 65A) on 07/05/1960. The last 20 of the class were delivered new to Kittybrewster. In 1960 they were all transferred to Scotland, some from 1963 returning to Paxman at Colchester for new engines and became Class 29. Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sulzer27jd Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 Err - unless others know better: When new, D6100-9 were allocated to 34B Hornsey, D6110-9 to 30A Stratford and D6120-37 to 32B Ipswich. D6127 delivered new on 06/10/1959, to Scotland (Eastfield 65A) on 07/05/1960. The last 20 of the class were delivered new to Kittybrewster. In 1960 they were all transferred to Scotland, some from 1963 returning to Paxman at Colchester for new engines and became Class 29. Paul D6127 went to 34B, it was D6138 that was the first to go straight to a Scottish shed when it was allocated to Edinburgh (St Margaret's) The remainder went to Aberdeen (Kittybrewster). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now