Jump to content
 

North Haston


Recommended Posts

I've started laying the track for the extension

Firstly I cleared about 2-3 inches of the old track

 

 

post-7237-0-40467400-1388412081.jpg

 

Next the new track was attached

 

post-7237-0-20489500-1388412450.jpg

 

I then removed the sleepers either side of the join and screwed down two lengths of copper clad sleeper strips

 

post-7237-0-52965900-1388412571.jpg

 

I then solder the rails to the CCS and added more screws

 

post-7237-0-19867400-1388412811.jpg

 

After cutting along the joint it was sprayed with sleeper grime.

 

post-7237-0-62833900-1388412920.jpg

 

With a bit of luck it should be dry soon so I can continue

 

I've started laying the track for the extension

Firstly I cleared about 2-3 inches of the old track

 

 

post-7237-0-40467400-1388412081.jpg

 

Next the new track was attached

 

post-7237-0-20489500-1388412450.jpg

 

I then removed the sleepers either side of the join and screwed down two lengths of copper clad sleeper strips

 

post-7237-0-52965900-1388412571.jpg

 

I then solder the rails to the CCS and added more screws

 

post-7237-0-19867400-1388412811.jpg

 

After cutting along the joint it was sprayed with sleeper grime.

 

post-7237-0-62833900-1388412920.jpg

 

With a bit of luck it should be dry soon so I can continue

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that double sided copperclad strip....? If it is, it helps to gap the screws so they are electrically dead, I once nearly destroyed a Shinohara crossing trying to isolate it from a mystery short, when the real problem was a nearby baseboard joint and power finding a path down the brass screws and along the underside of the strip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that double sided copperclad strip....? If it is, it helps to gap the screws so they are electrically dead, I once nearly destroyed a Shinohara crossing trying to isolate it from a mystery short, when the real problem was a nearby baseboard joint and power finding a path down the brass screws and along the underside of the strip.

Thanks Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hi Chris,

 

All this activity leaves an open question  - just hanging and begging to be answered!

 

What size will the layout be by the time it gets to Glasgow?

 

Need to let Ian know as soon as possible before the nice little gap sites that are spare at present get filled in...

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

!

 

What size will the layout be by the time it gets to Glasgow?

 

 

Hi Phil

It's all sorted thanks

I've been in contact with Ian before Warley

 

The full length at Glasgow will be 14 feet

9 feet of the layout with four and a half feet main fiddle yard plus another 6 inches by the silos to allow double headed locos run round.

 

I will be adding another four and a half feet fiddle yard to behind the silos for TVNAM next year!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear RMwebbers,

 

Um, just a quick one, isn't there any better way to go gaps in copper sleepers so they aren't so visually obvious?
(IE no scale 6" furrows down the sleeper centreline)

Maybe using a razor saw (IE thin as possible),
and cutting gaps hard-up against the web of the rail where there is a natural (IE visually expected anyway) visual linear line?

 

It would seem logical that by "hiding in plain sight" against the web of the rail, one can have their gaps, and keep them "invisible" at waaaay-tooo-close viewing distances too...

 

Just thinking out loud before launching into a dropleaf-traverser build session today...

 

Happy Modelling,
Aim to Improve,
Prof Klyzlr

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris - what about widening the bridge, and fitting the roadsign onto a vertical pole (telescoping brass tubes - use the one on kurumi.com for a pattern and solder them!), and placing the pole immediately in front of the split in the backscene? That line/join is always the most difficult bit to hide, and that seemed to work with Sin City Yard - the other alternative might be a divided multi-lane highweay with a central barrier, with curved-top light standards in the centre - again one up against the split

Edited by shortliner
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear RMwebbers,

 

Um, just a quick one, isn't there any better way to go gaps in copper sleepers so they aren't so visually obvious?

 

A ) Paint on a solution used to etch circuit boards (if I can find the spare crystals I have stashed away).

 

B ) Use a Dremel-type motor tool with a brass wire wheel, or a glass fibre brush to remove excess copper.

 

C ) Solder the rails directly to the brass screws, if the joint can't be hidden.

 

D ) Only model street running, although this makes disquising the join in the road surface trickier.

Edited by 298
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am using Central Valley turnout bases as a jig using an idea developed by Joe Fugate. On the copper clad timbers I cut the gap where it can be hidden by a plastic tie plate salvaged from surplus CV ties. The tie plates can be thinned down by rubbing them on sandpaper until they are "only wafer-thin Monsieur", then glued over the gap.
The only snag is that on the copper clad ties there isn't the grain detail that the CV ties have, but it isn't really noticeable once the turnout is painted and weathered unless you look really closely.

I think this method gives the strength of PCB construction with the detail afforded by the CV product. I'm not entirely happy with relying on glue to hold everything together, though the thinned barge cement does a decent job and I am happy with it on plain track with a few slimmed down spikes for good measure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gap cut close to rail base:

post-277-0-14457800-1388544098_thumb.jpg

Tie plate cut from CV tie and sanded down very thin:

post-277-0-28756100-1388544116_thumb.jpg

 

While cutting and sanding tie plates might sound a bit tedious, it is actually quite mind-numbing. But I don't think it takes any more time than filling gaps with putty and sanding them, and the PCB ties would really stick out like sore thumbs amid the plastic ones if there was no tie plate detail at all.

 

I have tried the tie plates from the Proto 87 stores but found that the rail foot of the Model Engineering code 70 rail I am using is too wide to fit them. I don't know whether they make different ones for code 83 that might work, but the sanding down method works for me, fiddly though it is.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As work progresses at North Haston I thought I'd share my thoughts on how the layout would now operate at shows.

 

post-7237-0-61867500-1389181416_thumb.jpg

 

Originally I had planned to just scenicing the staging area but after closer studying I thought I could add some interesting operation to the layout, if i added fiddle yards to either end of the scenic section

 

I've decided that North Haston, which has moved back up to the New England area, as it allows a larger variation of railroads, is now an interchange between a regional railroad/shortline and a Class one/regional railroad company. 

 

I'm not setting which is which in stone, so one day I can operate with ,say, the CSX interchanging with the Guilford,and the next day I could operate the Guilford interchanging with the Vermont Railroad.

 

Using the track plan below I will try and explain how it will operate.

 

post-7237-0-74167600-1389177968_thumb.jpg

 

  1. The class one/regional railroad comes in from the left on track one and pulls all the way to the right (3), once it's cleared the turnout the train backs up along the rear track (2) and uncouples just passed the grade crossing. Once uncoupled the mainline loco pulls forward under the highway bridge, the road is change, it then backs up and stands on the front track (1) clear of the crossing.
  2. Next the regional railroad/shortline train arrives from the right, the loco uncouples from its train just in front of the warehouse and heads off to couple up the the inbound train standing on the rear left hand track (2).
  3. The class one/regional railroad loco then starts up and couples to the outbound train and exits stage left.
  4. The regional railroad/shortline train then pulls back in, carries out any switching that is required then departs right to service the rest of the line.
  5. Once all this has happen an officers train, a Sperry Rail Car or even a light engine lash up might appear and then we start all over again.

Hope this makes sense... 

 

post-7237-0-39527600-1389180957.jpg

NS ex-Conrail Dash 8-40CW stands at Noth Haston

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

My word, Haston has growed!! :O :D

 

Interchange operations are great for small layouts - to me they are a good way of justifying more than one train 'on scene', & also justify the fairly quick turn-round of freight cars - far more realistic than cars being spotted at an Industry where in reality they might then wait hours or days, only on a model layout to be switched again a few minutes later...

An 'Interchange' layout doesn't need all - or even any - on-scene Industries for the cars to go to, & finally this sort of operation stands out, to me at least, as being "typically US" operation, far more common to happen on US railroads than it might in the UK, if it happens at all here these days?? I don't know, I'm not really up on the UK scene at all these days...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...