RMweb Premium Andy Keane Posted March 30 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 30 This is the 1946 view of the Helston carriage shed from above. It is very enlarged but I think I can just make out a coaling stage that I have red ringed in the image? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium 4069 Posted March 30 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 30 (edited) 7 hours ago, Steamport Southport said: Yes. In the link I posted earlier from 1906. It doesn't give a date of when they stopped using them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watlington_and_Princes_Risborough_Railway Jason Paul Karau and Chris Turner's Country Branch Line, which is the definitive history of the Watlington branch, says (volume 1, page 43) "We have not discovered any evidence that stream railmotors were ever used on the line, which is hardly surprising when an engine would still have been needed to handle the goods, thus obviating any economy. It is also doubtful whether a steam railmotor couuld have handled any worthwhile tail load on Chinnor bank. Nor is there any evidence that auto-working was employed. Auto-trailers were simply provided to serve new rail-level halts..." This passage is referenced in the linked Wikipedia entry (note 6). I don't really understand how WIkipedia works, in that it appears to accept two contradictory statements, but I would believe Karau and Turner every time. Edited March 30 by 4069 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium melmerby Posted March 30 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 30 Watlington* had a 57XX allocated on the 31st Dec 1947 and the layout seems too complicated for a Railmotor to service. *Sub to SLO 3 hours ago, 4069 said: I don't really understand how WIkipedia works It's user maintained, anyone can do it, so two people with differing views can upload input to the same topic. I did a change a couple of months ago to a music entry where a blatantly incorrect record number was given. (there was photographic evidence on Discogs that it was wrong) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steamport Southport Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 4 minutes ago, melmerby said: Watlington* had a 57XX allocated on the 31st Dec 1947 and the layout seems too complicated for a Railmotor to service. *Sub to SLO It's user maintained, anyone can do it, so two people with differing views can upload input to the same topic. I did a change a couple of months ago to a music entry where a blatantly incorrect record number was given. (there was photographic evidence on Discogs that it was wrong) I wouldn't go by what was there in 1947 as the SRMs were long gone by then. I also don't quite understand what you mean by "service". Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steamport Southport Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 3 hours ago, 4069 said: Paul Karau and Chris Turner's Country Branch Line, which is the definitive history of the Watlington branch, says (volume 1, page 43) "We have not discovered any evidence that stream railmotors were ever used on the line, which is hardly surprising when an engine would still have been needed to handle the goods, thus obviating any economy. It is also doubtful whether a steam railmotor couuld have handled any worthwhile tail load on Chinnor bank. Nor is there any evidence that auto-working was employed. Auto-trailers were simply provided to serve new rail-level halts..." This passage is referenced in the linked Wikipedia entry (note 6). I don't really understand how WIkipedia works, in that it appears to accept two contradictory statements, but I would believe Karau and Turner every time. I don't understand the reference to tail load. They were passenger trains! And I doubt any gradients on that route are as severe as Berwyn and I've been up that on a packed SRM with the trailer. Jason 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Oldddudders Posted March 31 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 31 I don't spend much time watching such videos but really enjoyed that one. A distinct shortage of trombone-zooming and wild panning helped. And the railmotor looked brill, of course. So glad I bought #61. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Harlequin Posted March 31 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 31 (edited) Watlington isn't mentioned in the allocations table for the SRMs or the service listings for 1911 in Lewis. Edited March 31 by Harlequin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Welchester Posted March 31 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 31 8 hours ago, Steamport Southport said: I don't understand the reference to tail load. They were passenger trains! And I doubt any gradients on that route are as severe as Berwyn and I've been up that on a packed SRM with the trailer. Jason From what I remember of that gala, on at least one journey the SRM had to stop between Llangollen and Berwyn to raise steam. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted April 6 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 6 A heads up from the Kernow newsletter to say that both bogies are available as separate items now. https://www.kernowmodelrailcentre.com/p/89421/K9009-Kernow-Models-GWR-Steam-Railmotor-Fishbelly-Bogie 5 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kernow MRC Posted April 8 Share Posted April 8 Bogies... As spotted by Robin above, the distinctive 9 foot wheelbase bogies either 'Fish belly' or 'Equalising beam' as fitted to our GWR Steam Railmotors (Diagram O and R respectively) are also suitable for use with other GWR coach types, we have therefore made these available as RTR complete spare parts with wheels, brake rigging and electrical pick ups, suitable for kit builders etc. Click here to order https://www.kernowmodelrailcentre.com/pg/144/GWR-Steam-Railmotor#Bogies 6 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold 57xx Posted April 8 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 8 On 31/07/2019 at 22:01, 57xx said: They could do with producing a few (hundred) extra of those American bogies, I'm sure they would sell out. 12 hours ago, Kernow MRC said: Bogies... As spotted by Robin above, the distinctive 9 foot wheelbase bogies either 'Fish belly' or 'Equalising beam' as fitted to our GWR Steam Railmotors (Diagram O and R respectively) are also suitable for use with other GWR coach types, we have therefore made these available as RTR complete spare parts with wheels, brake rigging and electrical pick ups, suitable for kit builders etc. Click here to order https://www.kernowmodelrailcentre.com/pg/144/GWR-Steam-Railmotor#Bogies As someone who pushed for this 5 years ago, I had better put my money where my mouth is! Well done Kernow, hopefully a good decision for you, it certainly is for those of use who can find a use for them on other projects. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard i Posted April 9 Share Posted April 9 We now just need the power bogie as a spare too. Nudge nudge richard 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Gwiwer Posted April 9 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 9 Some gentle weathering of the railmotor to give it an "in use" appearance. 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium stephennicholson Posted April 9 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 9 I too have applied a little weathering to the roof and underframe. Can't bring myself to do any thing to the crimson paintwork, except a little panel wash around the doors. Fitted passengers and crew, filled up the coal bunkers. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penrhos1920 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 On 06/04/2024 at 18:33, gwrrob said: A heads up from the Kernow newsletter to say that both bogies are available as separate items now. https://www.kernowmodelrailcentre.com/p/89421/K9009-Kernow-Models-GWR-Steam-Railmotor-Fishbelly-Bogie Is the price £7.99 per bogie or per pair? I think it’s the former but I want to check before ordering as I don’t want to purchase twice as many as I need.! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Phatbob Posted April 11 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 11 7 minutes ago, Penrhos1920 said: Is the price £7.99 per bogie or per pair? I think it’s the former but I want to check before ordering as I don’t want to purchase twice as many as I need.! That's the price per bogie. Not per pair. I blagged four of the Fishbelly type for my B-set project as soon as I was aware that they were available. They are very nice and great vale for the money IMHO. Arrived in the post PDQ too. :-) 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keith9111 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 (edited) Hi, I've just had delivery of one of the sound fitted versions and as I finally bit the bullet and got one as there starting to get thin on the ground. It's a wonderful little model and being my first sound fitted model it's a nice treat for myself. The whistles sound a tad tinney but being a novice at DCC especially sound it's the only tiny gripe as I'm not confident in working out how to turn just the whistles down a tad. Edited April 13 by keith9111 Missed point out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free At Last Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 14 minutes ago, keith9111 said: I think I've reset it by mistake What did you do to make you think that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keith9111 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 The sound functions were not matching what they should have been I found the instructions online and found how to reset it and they reverted back so all is well with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold 57xx Posted April 14 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 14 On 11/04/2024 at 20:20, Phatbob said: That's the price per bogie. Not per pair. I blagged four of the Fishbelly type for my B-set project as soon as I was aware that they were available. They are very nice and great vale for the money IMHO. Arrived in the post PDQ too. :-) I didn't know I needed any Fishbelly bogies, so imagine my surprise when a pair fell in to my basket along with a couple of pairs of American bogies. Now I need to start combing the books to see what I can put them under! 1 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted April 19 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 19 On 31/03/2024 at 09:21, Harlequin said: Watlington isn't mentioned in the allocations table for the SRMs or the service listings for 1911 in Lewis. The 1910 Service Timetable shows 'Autocars' for the passenger service but the trains atre not shown as 'auto' in the timing column headings. Taken together the two pieces of information could be read ambiguously in either direction meaning either that the cars were worked as auto trailers (and there was no need to spell it out) or that they weren't (because it wasn't spelt out). The line had a fair coverage of 'Goods' services back then and the ST quotes freight train loads for both 'Passenger' and 'Goods' engines with Passenger Engines being restricted to c.60% of the Goods Engine load in between Princes Risbro' and Watlington (i.e. descending the steepest gradient) and a slightly greater percentage, c.66%, in the opposite direction. Thus the loads were clearly based on stopping power not on haulage capacity which makes sense when one considers the wheel arrangement of the types of engines in use for the different types of traffic As far as tail traffic on rail motors is concerned (if they were used?) Karau and Turner note in GW Branch Line Termini' that a spare 4 wheel coach was at one time kept at Watlington. That, and more, would have been well within the capacity of a steam railmotor on the steepest gradient on the Watlington branch which was officially listed as 1 in 100. (Railmotors were allowed a tail load not exceeding 24 wheels on a 1 in 100 rising gradient.) Not that it answers whether or not they were ever used on the branch - an answer to that presumably lies in a 1906 Timetable (if the Wiki entry is based on anything at all). 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now