RMweb Premium Jason T Posted May 14, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 14, 2014 Dare I say they are my favourite shots for a while? They allow us to appreciate just how stunning the layout is whereas with photos of trains working through, I (and I am sure others) tend to concentrate on the locos and stock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Kazmierczak Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 Sometimes you don't even need a train. These building shots remind me of the film "The Ladykillers". The gentle colouring is reminiscent of the film; probably reflecting the GN parentage of both P'boro and Kings Cross. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmsforever Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 Looking good like the cameo outside the station couple looking at timetable,I am sure the lady looks like Nora Batty judging by the stockings!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donington Road Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 On Saturdays there were also 4 or more trains to Skegness, plus three instead of the usual two to Grimsby and Cleethorpes, and the usual seven to Peterborough or Grantham. That makes about 57 trains in 12 hours. Add in the suburban services at the South end and a few Class C and D goods, and even the four track sections must have been at capacity, while the effects of bottlenecks such as Welwyn viaduct and Arlesey, and other two track areas, apart from Peterborough itself can only be imagined. Little chance then of running most of the usual weekday goods trains I would think - it was difficult enough to get them through any where near on time during the week, so on Saturdays they would have got nowhere. Presumably though this will have applied every summer until the penny dropped and British holidaymakers realised that Spain is a slightly more desirable destination than Skeggy, and more of them had cars to get about in anyway. Having experienced family holidays on the Lincolnshire coast as a child I can say that it was indeed bracing that is when it was not both wet and bracing. This prompts me to wonder though why these suspended services, most of which were coal or returning empties, were in the WTT at all, as the same difficulties would occur year after year. It also makes me wonder if I am completely losing touch with sanity to even contemplate doing this sequence. We shall see. Don't forget the annual Splading Flower (Tulip) Parade which started in May 1958. An excuse to run an excursion or two with something out of the ordinary. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigwordsmith Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 What stunning buildings Wow Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium great northern Posted May 15, 2014 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 15, 2014 Bring the sky up a little so the sky horizon matches the model horizon, lighten it a little and white-out the join on the sky layer a little and the join then has a bit less dissonance. Lovely snaps though which sum up the layout's feel so well. PN_GN_forecourt.jpg Thanks Andy - looks like I shall be asking for another tutorial when you are next here. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium great northern Posted May 15, 2014 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 15, 2014 Sometimes you don't even need a train. These building shots remind me of the film "The Ladykillers". The gentle colouring is reminiscent of the film; probably reflecting the GN parentage of both P'boro and Kings Cross. IThere is so much about the old GN main line that I like, and yes indeed, the effect of gently weathered yellow brick buildings is one of them. The GN hotel never did look right in red brick, when it was on the old layout. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium great northern Posted May 15, 2014 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 15, 2014 Looking good like the cameo outside the station couple looking at timetable,I am sure the lady looks like Nora Batty judging by the stockings!!! Well spotted that man! The lady is in fact a refugee from the West Riding - Tetley's Mills in fact. That nice Mr Shakespeare gave me a box full of figures which he doesn't need for the new layout, and they are gradually appearing at Peterborough. Looks like "Nora" is a bit disenchanted with life down South though, as she seems to be seeking advice as to the time of the next train to Wakefield. I must ask Dave how he managed to achieve the sagging stockings effect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tetleys Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 Gilbert, It has taken an adult (post adolescent anyway) life of studying ladies wearing stockings with the sole intention of one day re-creating such detail for we aging modellers, so all that lusting was not wasted. Gabardine Mac. wearer of Ancaster Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CUTLER2579 Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 Gilbert, the local gossip in the Honnington area is that Dave perfected this particular skill whilst on location with Nora Batty in Holmfirth in Gods Wonderfull County. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Popular Post great northern Posted May 19, 2014 Author RMweb Premium Popular Post Share Posted May 19, 2014 Another visit by Peter Leyland yesterday, and more progress made. Both of us added some more detail, so we shall have a little quiz to see who can spot the changes. I'll start with the easy one. The excursion platform in the sunshine..... with an important addition. You should get this one straight away. More difficult now, but I'll give you a clue. Someone very quickly spotted what was wrong on this view, but now it is right. So, what has changed? No clues needed here. This is a record shot to show that Peter finally completed the tedious and fiddly job of adding microstrip to the canopy. He did this in small doses, and I can see why. This view, or similar, has been seen many times, but there is a significant change. Shouldn't be too difficult to spot. One small addition here. I reckon this is the most difficult one, though no doubt some clever ****** will come up with the answer straight away. The clue is that it is a structural addition. What's the Jubilee doing here? It is just coming off the afternoon Birmingham - Ely through train, which it might well have done in real life, though not till after February 1960. I've just successfully applied to have my modeller's licence renewed. 20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Kazmierczak Posted May 19, 2014 Share Posted May 19, 2014 I got 0/6 Lovely pictures though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium great northern Posted May 20, 2014 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 20, 2014 I got 0/6 Lovely pictures though. At least you had a go Peter, no-one else seems to be interested. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidw Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 (edited) TBH - I couldn't identify any. But you live with it day in day out Edited May 20, 2014 by davidw Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CUTLER2579 Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Question One :- White Lines on edge of Platform 6. Question Two:- I believe the canopy support brackets have had there wall fixings lengthened. Or on second thoughts the Platform Sign may be an addition. Third thoughts,just admit your struggling As for the rest,well 52 years ago my last school report said " B**** does well in subjects he is interested in but fails to pay attention to detail in subjects which don't interest him. Fair. Well maybe, but would apply to most Pupils aged 15 in my opinion. Peterborough North :- fails to pay attention to detail in subjects which don't interest him. No! that is not True,but still can't answer the other 4 questions. Now I hate bad losers,but :-,,,,,,,,,,,, in fact why don't you go and lose some Golf Balls --Gilbert Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwealleans Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Yes, 'fraid it was my club night last night so I didn't have chance to look hard. I guess that that big blue hanging sign on the excursion platforms is new and the porter in the last shot has had a new tie. Or somebody's helped the old lady pull her stockings up. I did spot that little bit of coping (corbel?) to the right in the last photo with some work and there are new platform signs? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium great northern Posted May 20, 2014 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 20, 2014 OK, I admit to being in rather mischievous mood when I concocted the questions. I was going to post some before and after shots, until I realised that I've deleted all the before ones. Anyway, here are the answers. 1. Gold star to Cutler- white lines is the right answer. They are now all in place, and do make a real difference. 2. This one was put there specifically for Jonathan, but his memory is obviously as dodgy as mine. Yes, it concerns the hanging sign, but it isn't new. Mr Wealleans helpfully pointed out to me that when originally installed the arrow encouraged passengers to leap off the platform and onto the track. We have now got round to putting that right. Much better to go through the door and over the footbridge. 4. This is the one I thought you would get. The end screen has been detailed and weathered, so we now have missing glass panels as on the real thing. The other end had already been done, see photo 6, but this end till now was pristine. 5. The clue was "small". There is an additional spotter at the end of the platform. He is another refugee from Tetley's Mills. Perhaps that is why he appears to be wearing wellies? It does rain most of the time up North, doesn't it? 6. This is one I thought no-one would get, so full marks to Jonathan. The valance was incomplete on the right hand side, so Peter put that right, and it does make a difference. There is also new brickwork in the bay platform, but painted white, as the real thing was for some mysterious reason. All in all, I reckon 50% would be a good score. I'll go back to non contentious posts now. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted May 20, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 20, 2014 Apologies Gilbert. I was having an identity crisis and so couldn't manage to identify any at all. Shiver me timbers Jim lad. P 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Alister_G Posted May 20, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted May 20, 2014 Well, I missed the opportunity to guess, but even having them pointed out to me still requires some searching I blame old age, poor eyesight and the onset of senility... However, I don't care, as just being able to look at more excellent photos of your layout is reward enough! Ooh, is that a bit over the top?? Nah! Al. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium great northern Posted May 21, 2014 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 21, 2014 Having shown you nothing happening, and then asked silly questions, I shall redress the balance, hopefully, by featuring a couple more trains. Nothing exciting, or even green though. Arguably both locos are attributable to Ivatt, though not the same one. The J6 is credited to Sir Nigel, but the experts seem agreed that it was effectively an H A Ivatt design. while the Flying Pig is definitely the work of Ivatt the younger. 43084 is arriving from Yarmouth, while a signalman who obviously likes risk has allowed the J6 to scurry through on the Down main with a humble trip working, even though the Flying Scotsman is due imminently. All should be well though, as the boards are off for New England yard, even though owing to the strange arrangement of PN signals, none of those in view is actually the relevant one. Nothing done to this one except cropping, so the duck egg blue walls have done their job, or not, as the case may be. I do like pre grouping locos, so two more views of the J6, this time with photoshopped sky. Still blue, but now not authentic. Does it really matter though? I really can't see why so much fuss is made about this. Anyway, doesn't she look sort of down at heel and well past her best days? Still a lovely sight though. 17 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold John B Posted May 21, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted May 21, 2014 That J6 is lovely indeed. Just right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium New Haven Neil Posted May 21, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 21, 2014 Agree totally, Gilbert - life is too short to get all het up about a bit of photo manipulation - it's been going on for years, only the medium has changed. The J6....phooooar! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manna Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 G'Day Gents Love the J6, to few Ex GN locos, made it to your era, mores the pity. manna Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigwordsmith Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Good pics Gilbert The key to manipulation is a bit like playing the drums - sometimes less noise creates a stronger result. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted May 22, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 22, 2014 Good pics Gilbert The key to manipulation is a bit like playing the drums - sometimes less noise creates a stronger result. Ooohh that's very profound 'smithy'; I assume you are a guitarist and not a sticksman then......... G . Baker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now