Jump to content
 

Caledonian Railway Dia.67 Van from Rapido


RapidoCorbs
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
9 hours ago, Buhar said:

I can't see the brake pipes on those models noted as dual braked.  Is that just the nature of these early images?

 

Alan

Vac and air hoses are planned to be included in the accessory bag. :)

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 17/02/2024 at 16:04, MartinRS said:

Well it's certainly a nice looking model, though not in my scale! Just out of curiosity; what is the purpose of the vertical gap (covered by blanking plates) in the end of the wagon? It can be seen here, with one blanking plate missing.

 

https://www.svrwiki.com/Caledonian_Railway_Covered_Goods_Van_302080

 

On 17/02/2024 at 21:16, rapidoTom said:

The drawings refer to the sliding panel on the left hand side of the ends, as simply "door" - the reference book calls it a "sliding flap". So it seems to be a door rather than a vent, but what for is not explicitly mentioned. I shall leave that up for debate!

 

I believe these were for loading long thin items which couldn't fit through the centre door.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 17/02/2024 at 19:27, Wickham Green too said:

The LNER used a similar opening on its standard vans - for some reason ............ the ability to inspect contents through it would depend on what the contents were - a single large item could easily block the view of anything else which might need inspecting. A loading point for long thin items might be more plausible - sometimes, nowadays, you see openings on road vehicles which I presume are for that purpose.

Pondering the purpose of the blanked opening set me off looking for similar openings on other vans. The LNER version is square and small compared to the CR version and would only be suitable for loading rods or lengths of timber whereas the CR opening looks like it might have been used for loading rigid sheets. I also found images of NER vans with small square openings, just like the LNER vans. (The LNER vans could have been built to a NER diagram). Did the CR move lots of timber? I suppose the ability of the CR to shift lengthy rigid rods and sheets along with more conventional types of produce shipped in vans could potentially reduce the number of wagons in a train in cases where the 'lengthy load' was was quite small.

 

Whatever the reason for the small end doors, it must have made the construction of the vans more complex than a conventionally built van.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

My assumption is that the goods were still loaded and unloaded through the main doors, but having a small hatch in opposite corners allowed long items to poke out the other side during that process, before being drawn back in.  Thus the van could carry items the full length of its load space that otherwise could not fit through the side door.  It seems like a good idea and obviously the LNER persisted with it, but the fact that it was not adopted as standard suggests that the hatches may not have been used much in practice.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Steamport Southport said:

They're shuttered louvres.

 

Some GWR vans had them as well.

 

 

Jason

But these aren't shuttered. As we have been told, they are a door. 

 

Paul

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, hmrspaul said:

But these aren't shuttered. As we have been told, they are a door. 

 

Paul

 

I doubt that. Why would you load anything from there? Hardly a suitable angle to work from.

 

You certainly wouldn't be putting wood in a van like has been suggested as vans were for perishable and valuable goods. They would use a bolster wagon for wood. And if there was a need for loading items into a van length ways why didn't they build longer vans with end doors. We aren't talking about pre history these were built from 1910 and the CR certainly had bogie vehicles by that time.

 

It's a vent. To suggest it's anything else just doesn't make sense. The CR certainly had a lot of fruit traffic (despite the jokes about Scots not eating fruit and veg). I would assume that a busy times they needed other vans to supplement the actual fruit vans.

 

Look at a Y4 for evidence of a van with two main ventilators and a shuttered louvre.

 

I wonder who makes a Y4....

 

https://rapidotrains.co.uk/gwr-banana-van-y4/

 

 

Jason

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There has been discussion of the end hatches before, though it didn't lead to a definite conclusion:

 

Sliding windows in the end of vans - UK Prototype Questions - RMweb

 

I have read in a book that they were for loading, because prior to that I'd always assumed they were vents.  Perhaps the book was wrong, and the square hatches on LNER vans were particularly small.  However on the CR van there are both bonnet vents and these hatches, which seems odd if the hatches are just vents.  The CR did have a lot of seasonal fruit & veg traffic so maybe merchandise vans got additional vents for that.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 17/02/2024 at 15:20, Wickham Green too said:

I think this is the one that went to Brechin

 

b50_31.jpg.81dfce101098752eb82c5604bb27ea88.jpg

Huntly : 26/3/84

 

... though the body of this one was a wee bit better

 

42_20.jpg.1cb66bae884191d49b13b1631a74eac4.jpg

Forres ; 16/4/80

 

 

If the top one did go to Brechin, there is only a chassis left now sadly...

 

Photo belonging to Allan Jenkins.

 

IMG_2496%20copy-600x400.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Steamport Southport said:

 

I doubt that. Why would you load anything from there? Hardly a suitable angle to work from.

 

You certainly wouldn't be putting wood in a van like has been suggested as vans were for perishable and valuable goods. They would use a bolster wagon for wood. And if there was a need for loading items into a van length ways why didn't they build longer vans with end doors. We aren't talking about pre history these were built from 1910 and the CR certainly had bogie vehicles by that time.

 

It's a vent. To suggest it's anything else just doesn't make sense. The CR certainly had a lot of fruit traffic (despite the jokes about Scots not eating fruit and veg). I would assume that a busy times they needed other vans to supplement the actual fruit vans.

 

Look at a Y4 for evidence of a van with two main ventilators and a shuttered louvre.

 

I wonder who makes a Y4....

 

https://rapidotrains.co.uk/gwr-banana-van-y4/

 

 

Jason

We have been told that the a drawing calls them doors. There is no louvre. I've always thought they were for observing a load - the more recent (!) GRAINS have a small windows in the ends https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brgrainrivetcgorivet/e1915caf6  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brgraincgo/ee7e0ed8

 

I don't deny they may have been for ventilation, but they were open spaces and not louvred.  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/lnercoveredmerchandise/e2b04183a   https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/lnercoveredmerchandise/e30ea5ba4

 

 

Paul

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, hmrspaul said:

We have been told that the a drawing calls them doors. There is no louvre. I've always thought they were for observing a load - the more recent (!) GRAINS have a small windows in the ends https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brgrainrivetcgorivet/e1915caf6  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brgraincgo/ee7e0ed8

 

I don't deny they may have been for ventilation, but they were open spaces and not louvred.  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/lnercoveredmerchandise/e2b04183a   https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/lnercoveredmerchandise/e30ea5ba4

 

 

Paul

 

The second grain wagon does not have an end window - it is a OHLW plaque.

 

The fourth photo clearly shows a vertically sliding hatch cover - the top half of the slide was originally fully boarded over.

 

As there is no apparent way of securing the hatch cover in the up position, I would suggest that it is intended for inspection purposes and not for ventilation.

 

I suppose that it could have been used for loading long, thin items - but that seems to be a bit far-fetched to me.

 

CJI.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SteamingWales said:

Would these wagons have easily made it onto other railway networks?

 

Thinking through workings onto the Highland Railway (for the Jones Goods to haul) as an example?

 

I don't see why not, although I suppose it depends on what part of the Highland Railway you're modelling and also what time period.  As distance from the Caledonian Railway network increases, the likelihood of one of these appearing would presumably have declined.   I'd imagine that the majority of traffic from the Scottish Central Belt (ie Caledonian territory) to north of Inverness would have been transhipped in Inverness.  I'd therefore expect to see these CR wagons on the Highland Mainline (ie between Stanley Junction and Inverness), but perhaps they were rather rare visitors to more far flung destinations like Kyle of Lochalsh or Thurso.

 

Of course after 1919, when the Railway Clearing House extended the common user scheme that had been introduced in 1917 for open wagons, to include unfitted covered goods wagons, they would have started to wander further from Caledonian territory, giving an increased likelihood of one being seen north of Inverness.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...