Jump to content
 

When the real thing looks like a model


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
40 minutes ago, Ben B said:

 

That looks very dodgy... could easily imagine someone under that bridge, blocking the road, no room to get by and the barriers drop...

 

Hence the road signs telling drivers that vehicles travelling away from the crossing have priority over those coming the other way under the narrow bridge and the level crossing itself being of the full barriered 'controlled' type using CCTV.

 

In short it is perfectly safe and not in any way 'dodgy'

 

 

Edited by phil-b259
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
30 minutes ago, Ben B said:

 

That looks very dodgy... could easily imagine someone under that bridge, blocking the road, no room to get by and the barriers drop...

At least they are controlled barriers, someone or some technology has to check that the crossing is clear before the signals can be cleared.

 

Andi

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 11/11/2023 at 11:17, Ian Morgan said:

Having a road go under a rail bridge and then across a level crossing never looks convincing on a layout.

Even closer together (Waupaca, WI):

image.png.36d6be76817b6bf1ed6b17d16b3c92c0.png

No barrier either.

The low level track is a loop off the high level track for access to a foundry

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I've known Elm Road Crossing for over seventy years. Most interesting when it had it's own crossing box, which was located at the RH end of the short white fence behind the woman and buggy. 

 

Elm Road is pretty busy, especially at school start and fish times (there are a number of schools in the immediate area whose catchment areas also covers the other side of Kingston Road 300 yards beyond the overbridge. By and large drivers do tend to obey the signage, in particular the give way sign on the other side of the bridge for traffic approaching from Kingston Road. I've never seen any real problems with driver behaviour or recall any "incidents".

 

I haven't driven that way more than half-a-dozen times in the last 40+ years. With 4 time tabled  trains an hour outside of peak times (plus ECS to and from Strawberry Hill) you can wait up to 11 minutes for a clear path; 44 minutes an hour with the barriers down! 

  • Like 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I took this last night and feel that the hills in the background look a bit back-scene like, with the case further helped that the working is a bit of rule-1/special train. The lights also appear over-bright which is another model railway thing that I’ve noticed.

IMG_3967.jpeg.21640755f3d6427683acca61ac780533.jpeg

 

  • Like 13
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 11/11/2023 at 11:17, Ian Morgan said:

Having a road go under a rail bridge and then across a level crossing never looks convincing on a layout.

 

 

 

On 28/01/2024 at 10:40, melmerby said:

Even closer together (Waupaca, WI):

image.png.36d6be76817b6bf1ed6b17d16b3c92c0.png

No barrier either.

The low level track is a loop off the high level track for access to a foundry

 

How about a road going across a level crossing AND under a bridge at the same time...

https://flic.kr/p/5VE3HC

 

https://flic.kr/p/5VzUXB

Edited by DavidBird
  • Like 3
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
22 hours ago, DavidBird said:

How about a road going across a level crossing AND under a bridge at the same time...

 

10 hours ago, Wickham Green too said:

All we need is a ( rail ) bus on the bridge an' the model's complete !

 

With a barge canal and a tube tunnel underneath, for a four-level operation?

  • Funny 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 05/02/2024 at 09:52, Wickham Green too said:

 

All we need is a ( rail ) bus on the bridge an' the model's complete !

 

Like this?
 

image.png.aeca739abe2563af231f63c41a37bf8c.png

 

Ok, so the scenery needs a bit of work....

  • Like 3
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, steve1 said:

Busy fiddleyard operators!

Not really- it was only one train one each track* ............................. would be interesting to know how long before the next train appeared ??!?

 

* though there are actually FOUR SIX tracks on the overbridge - Chiltern were missing out on the party and could have made it TEN TWELVE trains !!

Edited by Wickham Green too
can't count
  • Like 3
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Colin_McLeod said:

Far too many trains all running at once.  Would you ever see this in real life? Apparrently it has happened.

 

 

 

Obviously a big Roundy!

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, Wickham Green too said:

 though there are actually FOUR tracks on the overbridge - Chiltern were missing out on the party and could have made it TEN trains !!

There were six tracks last time I looked- there could have been fast Met trains as well, making twelve!

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...