RMweb Premium 2ManySpams Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 23, 2016 Spams must be a genius if he thinks he knows what that tender is but perhaps the fact he has seen a copy of a photo Colin Penfold sent me helped.It's a Bulleid 4500gal tender with raves still attached (not cut down). There's only one tender (ok 2 if you count the larger 5500gal version) with that profile. I'd have guessed even had I not seen this a while back... 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) It's a Bulleid 4500gal tender with raves still attached (not cut down). There's only one tender (ok 2 if you count the larger 5500gal version) with that profile. I'd have guessed even had I not seen this a while back... rps20160123_093859.jpg That narrows the search for the actual loco Chris and Rob has the date photo taken ('57). I'd go for a B of B from Friary/72A and hazard a guess at 34072 but there were loads like this in '57. Your play! An interesting working for the familiarisation trip especially with this load of coaches. I like the fact the the coach with Firsts had roof strips; plebs could get soaked seemingly. Phil Edited January 23, 2016 by Mallard60022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Oldddudders Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2016 That narrows the search for the actual loco Chris and Rob has the date photo taken. I'd go for a B of B from Friary/72A and hazard a guess at 34072. Your play! Phil Did that have a 4500 tender? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 23, 2016 Did that have a 4500 tender? Have not bothered to check yet!! I like a gamble....... Q Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Oldddudders Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2016 Have not bothered to check yet!! I like a gamble....... Q Well it shouldn't have, as of course you know! But it got 3257 in 1958. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted January 23, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2016 Can anyone tell me what's going on in this rare Tigley Junction photo taken post war. The postman's been again..... 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Stubby47 Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2016 Can anyone tell me what's going on in this rare Tigley Junction photo taken post war. DSCN7639(1)bw.jpg The postman's been again..... Needs more coal in the bunker, or the driver's hit the brakes quite hard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trains&armour Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Can anyone tell me what's going on in this rare Tigley Junction photo taken post war. DSCN7639(1)bw.jpg The postman's been again..... It's looking for stray SR brake vans.... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Neal Ball Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 23, 2016 Can anyone tell me what's going on in this rare Tigley Junction photo taken post war. DSCN7639(1)bw.jpg The postman's been again..... Is it the new Anti-Rhino device? - Designed to keep any stray Rhino off the tracks :-) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted January 23, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2016 There are double standards being shewn on this thread. 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cary hill Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Can anyone tell me what's going on in this rare Tigley Junction photo taken post war. DSCN7639(1)bw.jpg The postman's been again..... It's done well to get to the South Hams all the way from Polmadie, Glasgow. Pity it's in LMS drab, this one is more colourful: 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trains&armour Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) Is it the new Anti-Rhino device? - Designed to keep any stray Rhino off the tracks :-) I will have you know Sir, that GWR Rhino's are very well behaved animals, and will not stray onto tracks in any circumstances! They certainly do not need a foreign engine to remind them of that! Yours respectfully, Drs R. H. Ino-Tuinstra, Chairman of the "GWR society for useful Rhino employment" Edited January 23, 2016 by Trains&armour 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cary hill Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 There are double standards being shewn on this thread. DSCN7642.jpg DSCN7643.jpg DSCN7644.jpg At least it's Fair play and not Fowler play Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium 2ManySpams Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 23, 2016 Can anyone tell me what's going on in this rare Tigley Junction photo taken post war. DSCN7639(1)bw.jpg The postman's been again..... As there's no crew I'm guessing that it's a runaway ;-p Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Captain Kernow Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2016 As there's no crew I'm guessing that it's a runaway ;-p I'm not surprised it's running away, it's probably come via the Savvan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanchester Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 There are double standards being shewn on this thread. DSCN7642.jpg DSCN7643.jpg DSCN7644.jpg Great combination. Am I the only one not fully to have appreciated the size/length difference between the 3MT and the 4MT (don't often see 'real life' pix of the two together, and I never actually saw an 82XXX at all).. We tend to go around retrospectively saying that such and such a class was unnecessary - the bigger (or smaller) version could have done the job - but I'm not sure we all get the sheer size constraints involved. It tends to crop up with items like short-tender Sandringhams for tiny tiny GE turntables, but perhaps we don't always see the bigger requirements picture? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Captain Kernow Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2016 Seriously, Robin, what is the rationale for the Fairburn 2-6-4T, other than 'it's my trainset?' (fine by me if it's the latter, by the way). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold gwrrob Posted January 23, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2016 Seriously, Robin, what is the rationale for the Fairburn 2-6-4T, other than 'it's my trainset?' (fine by me if it's the latter, by the way). Its owner , not me btw,wanted to see it on here, apparently by doing so it's doubled in value.I promise not to shew anything else LMS in future. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trains&armour Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Its owner , not me btw,wanted to see it on here, apparently by doing so it's doubled in value.I promise not to shew anything else LMS in future. I confess, it's all my fault.... But no LMS? Are you going to renumber-repaint the next one then....?. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Popular Post gwrrob Posted January 23, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Popular Post Share Posted January 23, 2016 A more appropriate double header for this thread . Here's hoping it's better received. 21 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cary hill Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 I promise not to shew anything else LMS in future. .....except for LMS coaches.........eventually........ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold NHY 581 Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2016 Can anyone tell me what's going on in this rare Tigley Junction photo taken post war. DSCN7639(1)bw.jpg The postman's been again..... Splendid image Rob. I am quite partial to a 2.6.4T and the Fairburn is a good example. Much more appealing than a large Prairie. I much prefer the small prairies to the large. An unusual example of small one being preferable to large ones. Rub. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Mallard60022 Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 23, 2016 Around 3 dozen of those Fairburns worked around the BR Southern until replaced by Standards; any excuse........................................ P 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Fatadder Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2016 Could I make a request? I'd rather like to see some centenarys please, don't mind what's in front of it (the coaches are far more interesting than tge poco!) 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cary hill Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Anything's more interesting than tge poco! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now