Jump to content
 

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold
8 hours ago, Mick Bonwick said:

 

The sensible, more polite and informative answer to your question, Stu, is that I will create another model in a similar state to the one portrayed above, showing how each stage is completed. I'll put it in my weathering blog and advise here of its presence, once it's started. Materials needed will be matt varnish, wash and pigment; tools will be brushes, cotton swabs and cocktail sticks. Subject will be one of the Oxford Diecast 1/76th models, but I don't know which one until I find the box marked "Road Vehicles".

 

 

Nice to see I'm not the only one who gets grubby when weathering. I often have to wash inbetween the varnish and pigment stages. 

  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Funny 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I found the box tucked away in a corner.

 

P1030624.JPG.4aebaef2be2d0342f7f70385b4f808c9.JPG

 

 

A bit of delving produced this pile to choose from:

 

P1030625_Portrait.JPG.8e5cd8a30881d1d4835759c6a75c3aaf.JPG

 

 

Decision made:

 

P1030627_Small.jpg.e97752da70201a91a039c1d1324f550f.jpg

 

 

 

 

The weathering is under way. Head on over to Mick Bonwick's Blog and you'll see what's in store.

 

 

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
7 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

Those cars all look the same.

 

Oh no they're not! Some are short, some are long, there are lots of different colours and some have even got writing on the side.

  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Round of applause 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
16 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

Those cars all look the same. Are they some sort of British make?

They are of Welsh design, look you.

Edited by Stubby47
  • Like 1
  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, Oldddudders said:

Most of them leak. End of. 

 

It comes with age. 

  • Agree 3
  • Funny 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

A bit different, this post, because I'm showing how little I know about photography. Most of the shots that I put on here are one of many in a group that are taken just in case one of them is any good.

 

The staging of a photograph. Odd bits brought together and a bit of cropping to finish with.

 

P1030649.JPG.85ac4ef5449378e25108309ee9a6633a.JPG

 

P1030649_Cropped.JPG.4d6aac2cdaccceed5b5424e804781c10.JPG

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

No tax disc, no wing mirrors, dodgy rear tyres - the local bobby is going to have a field day. (Unless it belongs to a mate of course.)

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Funny 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mick Bonwick said:

 

It's hoping to be one of these when it grows up:

 

346386085_LandRoverDragster.jpg.fbc6f41896100c1c3528e4fd3e1406c3.jpg

 

 

 

Looks like some bloke called Clarkson blew the Top Gear budget on that one !

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
23 hours ago, Oldddudders said:

Most of them leak. End of. 

 

Land Rover's don't leak.  They mark their territory.

 

7 hours ago, Mick Bonwick said:

 

It's hoping to be one of these when it grows up:

 

346386085_LandRoverDragster.jpg.fbc6f41896100c1c3528e4fd3e1406c3.jpg

 

 

 

Mind bleach required, urgently.

 

Adrian

  • Agree 3
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

On page 36 we looked at the size of ground cover compared with a Modelu 4mm scale foot.

 

https://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/151137-easton-isle-of-portland/&do=findComment&comment=4381225

 

I have now accumulated an assortment of ground cover materials, ready for further scenic tasks, and decided to measure each of them against the same character's foot. Each material was laid upon a thin spreading of PVA and left to dry, and then some Russian Earth pigment was brushed onto each section. Granule size vs foot size photographs revealed, in order of particle size:

 

IMG_0971.JPG.93a50946c4f3bc25eb4c5eaaf35975e8.JPG

 

IMG_0970.JPG.ca5ed3c5580d6c61d60e35d9f31cbee4.JPG

 

IMG_0972.JPG.a11570058d1a4e8e86aa439cab8db46f.JPG

 

IMG_0973.JPG.5f7614750956843621cfe1e74abcab2c.JPG

 

IMG_0974.JPG.cdca27d1061e04a8509577b2a152bc1b.JPG

 

In all cases except the second photograph the ballast behind the figure is Woodland Scenics medium grade. The second photograph shows Woodland Scenics fine grade.

 

Edited by Mick Bonwick
  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
6 minutes ago, Mick Bonwick said:

 

No. Have you?

 

No but it looked like a possible blend from your photos above. Will have a try at some point.

  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Ah. I thought you might be able to show a photograph of that combination.

 

The chinchilla sand illustrated was the result of sieving what came out of the bag, being the smaller of the two resulting sizes. Here is a comparison of the two:

 

P1030630_Cropped.JPG.26d360af5fe8ede11f583cb8784dc4d5.JPG

 

The sieve was a standard flour sieve, not from the kitchen but purchased specifically for the task. Honest!

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 3
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a good set of photos Mick. I recon for 4mm scale fine ballast is too coarse for most things. When you look at roads, yards etc from our scale distances it's hard to see a lot of texture.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...