Andy Y Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 ah I think they'll have models out before the 10 years sorting Brexit out will be over , damm I mentioned the B word, I promised myself....... Yes; behave! Anyway I've just finished reviewing their Cement Bubble, probably the best RTR wagon I've seen so this could all be very interesting. 14 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwardian Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 I only hope the reading on the gauge is prototypical! It does look stunning. Still, "a number of eras", they did say "a number of eras"! One can but hope! 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickham Green Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 I only hope the reading on the gauge is prototypical! It does look stunning. Still, "a number of eras", they did say "a number of eras"! One can but hope! No, it wasn't "a number of errors" ............ I can only see two : that horrible THING sticking out from under the headstock and the rather less than 21mm track gauge ( er - as supplied ). Best of luck lads - if you do something Southern and suitable for post war I won't have one ......... sorry, I mean I won't necessarily restrict myself to one. ( Two Leaders would really be greedy ! ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
34theletterbetweenB&D Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 It seems to me that in steam era wagons there are a couple of very common designs from the biggest of the big Four which lack models to a good standard. Since this group was of all the UK railways the one significantly involved in operations in Ireland, I wonder if there is any crossover potential? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Dunsignalling Posted November 30, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 30, 2017 It seems to me that in steam era wagons there are a couple of very common designs from the biggest of the big Four which lack models to a good standard. Since this group was of all the UK railways the one significantly involved in operations in Ireland, I wonder if there is any crossover potential? And one existing model wagon that is long overdue for an application of "uncompromising fidelity" figured prominently in traffic from the Emerald Isle....... John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickham Green Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 It seems to me that in steam era wagons there are a couple of very common designs from the biggest of the big Four which lack models to a good standard. Since this group was of all the UK railways the one significantly involved in operations in Ireland, I wonder if there is any crossover potential? I guess you're referring to the largest joint stock Company in the world ( Or was that just its largest constituent ? ) ......... unfortunately they only had two types of wagon built for service west of the North Channel : one of which was a widened version of one of their 1930's open wagon variants and the other a re-hashed goods van inspired by a design from their second largest constituent - both were built during the war ( that's the 'Emergency' for those of you reading this in the twenty six counties ) by the second largest UK railway at the time ( That fact is probably not unconnected with the use of timber frames under all these wagons. ) .................... anyway, not a lot of crossover of wagon design at that time - though there were some similar-ish vans built later. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talltim Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 No, it wasn't "a number of errors" ............ I can only see two : that horrible THING sticking out from under the headstock and the rather less than 21mm track gauge ( er - as supplied ). Best of luck lads - if you do something Southern and suitable for post war I won't have one ......... sorry, I mean I won't necessarily restrict myself to one. ( Two Leaders would really be greedy ! ) I have to say, as someone who’s been out of UK modelling for years, tension lock couplers look even more terrible on high quality models than they did on 90s models Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
34theletterbetweenB&D Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 I have to say, as someone who’s been out of UK modelling for years, tension lock couplers look even more terrible on high quality models than they did on 90s models It is true. We can hardly load the expectation for something different and much better on a new entrant business though. 'In my dreams' someone designs a coupler pocket system for 4mm to fit in the bufferbeam, and a range of couplers to fit: which provide compatability to current couplers (an 'ultra-cranked' miniature tension lock for example) and options for near scale autocouplers which look something like three link and screw link. Knuckle couplers, both over scale and scale versions would work with small adjustment to their magnetic droppers, and scale three/screw link options too... In my dreams 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
34theletterbetweenB&D Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 And one existing model wagon that is long overdue for an application of "uncompromising fidelity" figured prominently in traffic from the Emerald Isle....... Of course, the large livestock trade: there must have been several designs of LMS group cattle wagons in addition to LMS standard wagons in this traffic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Dunsignalling Posted December 2, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 2, 2017 I have to say, as someone who’s been out of UK modelling for years, tension lock couplers look even more terrible on high quality models than they did on 90s models Unfortunately, any new entrant to r-t-r is more-or-less saddled with conforming to the "industry norm" where couplers are concerned. The best we can hope for is the NEM pocket to be in the right place. John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PenrithBeacon Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 Unfortunately, any new entrant to r-t-r is more-or-less saddled with conforming to the "industry norm" where couplers are concerned. The best we can hope for is the NEM pocket to be in the right place. John I have often wondered why it is that a coupling on the lines of Dingham or Sprat hasn't emerged that uses to NEM pocket to better effect Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Dunsignalling Posted December 2, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 2, 2017 (edited) I have often wondered why it is that a coupling on the lines of Dingham or Sprat hasn't emerged that uses to NEM pocket to better effect Somebody has made up Sprat & Winkles to fit NEM pockets, though not commercially. There was a "how-to" article in Railway Modeller, IIRC. I will edit this post if/when I identify which issue..... John CORRECTION: It was in an article entitled "Maunsells for Manston" by Andy Hopper, in BRM, August 2008 Edited December 2, 2017 by Dunsignalling Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Nile Posted December 2, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 2, 2017 I have often wondered why it is that a coupling on the lines of Dingham or Sprat hasn't emerged that uses to NEM pocket to better effect A version of the Greenwich coupling has been designed to fit the NEM362 socket. I've got some test etches somewhere. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil gollin Posted December 3, 2017 Author Share Posted December 3, 2017 CB4.jpg . I have to ask, why "40 lbs/MM" ? 40 lbs / mm (not MM) would be bad enough (mixing imperial and metric) but not having the "squared" ( mm2 ) makes it even weirder. . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Nile Posted December 3, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 3, 2017 The first M is a square, so it probably means per square metre. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Saunders Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 . I have to ask, why "40 lbs/MM" ? 40 lbs / mm (not MM) would be bad enough (mixing imperial and metric) but not having the "squared" ( mm2 ) makes it even weirder. . No more weird than 4mm to the foot! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Nile Posted December 3, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 3, 2017 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold McC Posted December 3, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 3, 2017 The first M is a square, so it probably means per square metre. Exactly that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psiborg Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Good luck with your forthcoming range! Hopefully, there may be something in it I want (and if there is, i can afford one or some) I also like what you have said about announcing new releases when there is something to be shown!!! Simon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Accurascale Fran Posted December 5, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 5, 2017 (edited) Hi everyone, While I know it's not everyone's cup of tea, we have launched our Facebook page. If you are on Facebook it would be great to give us a like! https://www.facebook.com/AccurascaleUK/ Thanks, Fran Edited December 5, 2017 by 071 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Tim Dubya Posted December 6, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 6, 2017 If not already mentioned and if this is allowed, this was posted on the EMGS website (02/12/17). "Accurascale announce intent to produce UK models Posted on December 2nd, 2017 • Filed in: Society news The Society was approached by Accurascale, an Irish company, who have plans to make UK 4mm scale rolling stock and locomotives. They asked our requirement for them to make models that would be convertible to EM & P4. Board member Karl Crowther has gathered the thoughts of the Board and submitted suggestions to Accurascale. The discussions were amicable, but we must now wait until the initial model(s) are released on the 31st January." Please join us. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Accurascale Fran Posted December 6, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 6, 2017 If not already mentioned and if this is allowed, this was posted on the EMGS website (02/12/17). "Accurascale announce intent to produce UK models Posted on December 2nd, 2017 • Filed in: Society news The Society was approached by Accurascale, an Irish company, who have plans to make UK 4mm scale rolling stock and locomotives. They asked our requirement for them to make models that would be convertible to EM & P4. Board member Karl Crowther has gathered the thoughts of the Board and submitted suggestions to Accurascale. The discussions were amicable, but we must now wait until the initial model(s) are released on the 31st January." Please join us. Thanks Tim Dubya. One clarification on the above is that we will be unveiling the model(s) on February 1st, not releasing it or them on Jan 31st as above. Cheers! Fran 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
26power Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 (edited) Anyone able to add 2 and 2 to get 6 from the different buffer types in the image on the Facebook site?! Will obviously remove if including this creates any offence, or stirs frothers too much! Hi everyone, While I know it's not everyone's cup of tea, we have launched our Facebook page. If you are on Facebook it would be great to give us a like! https://www.facebook.com/AccurascaleUK/ Thanks, Fran Edited December 7, 2017 by 26power 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoelG Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 The Accurascale guys have a proven track record over in the Irish Market (i.e. Irish Railway Models). They are headed by a successful technology sector business entrepreneur who has a passion for railway modelling and a team with an obsession for accuracy. They started only two years ago, cautiously walked before they ran, and yes there was lots of hype and rather annoying "announcements about announcements", but in the end it all came good and they delivered stunning models with a level of detail and accuracy we had not seen before over here. They have certainly raised the bar very significantly for RTR wagons. They have successfully shipped two products to the Irish market this year, about to ship a third before Christmas and their fourth Irish wagon project in the new year. They had cleverly designed the wagons so that customers with 21mm gauge Irish layouts could easily replace the supplied 00 gauge wheels with scale Irish broad gauge 5'3" (21mm) axles, which will be even easier for their UK products (i.e. EM/P4, etc). They have indicted to their Irish customer base that future projects will be announced when pre-production samples are complete and within weeks of production delivery so there should be no long waits in the future, and hopefully less "hyped announcement fatigue". The key is they delivered the goods, well beyond expectations so I suspect they will do the same with their UK market offerings. Over here we are looking forward to their 2018 projects. IRM Cement Bubbles wagons (their 2nd project) Look at the pressure gauge Look whats underneath!!! A few lightly weathered by this amateur IRM's first project shipped earlier this year - Irish Ballast Wagons 15 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwardian Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Very impressive, indeed. I am not one who is likely to change my eras of interest based upon the quality and availability of RTR support, but I am sure many modellers will have been in a position to enjoy these releases, they certainly raise the bar for RTR wagons. The assumption that progress in quality and fidelity is positive and continuous has proved flawed in recent, bountiful, years, because the rush to market, particularly by some new players and projects, has fairly regularly resulted in a falling off, particularly regarding accuracy, and particularly where inaccuracy was not a necessary technical compromise but a result of uncorrected mistakes and, ultimately, not caring enough to get it right. What has concerned me most has been the often complacent response to this by hobbyists and less-than-exacting reviewers. I don't want manufacturers to get the message that their customers will be content with any reasonable approximation. I say all this (and apologies for the ramble, and, indeed, for sermonising) because it strikes me that Accurascale help not just their own customers by insisting on higher standards, but raise the bar more generally and help to reverse the trend towards second best. A positive development for the hobby. And, if Accurascale ever get tempted by earlier periods ...... 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now