Jump to content
Users will currently see a stripped down version of the site until an advertising issue is fixed. If you are seeing any suspect adverts please go to the bottom of the page and click on Themes and select IPS Default. ×
RMweb
 

Bridge collapse in the US


kevinlms

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
2 minutes ago, 'CHARD said:

Cars and their occupants in peril according to the 9.0 radio news.

8 degrees C, according to reports. Plus whatever depth the water is. Not a good place to be.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
Posted (edited)

Apparently there was about twenty workers on the bridge doing repairs as well as several cars and a truck-trailer combination. There is now talk of the vessels engine failing and the ship losing leeway and being unable to stop.

Live report here.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-us-canada-68663071

Edited by PhilJ W
  • Friendly/supportive 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

News update live from the scene.

 

Summary :

 

Sonar has detected vehicles in the water, at least 7 but an unknown total.

Believed there were workers on the bridge but not confirmed.

 

2 people rescued, 1 ok, 1 seriously injured.

 

Water temperature low, and now incoming tide adding to the problems along with the fact that any in the water will have been in there for an extended time.

 

The light is now coming up.

  • Informative/Useful 4
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Shocking, and for those on the bridge terrifying… they literally had no where to go.

 

Ive seen a lot of these style bridges in the US, long thin, often look very insecure but cover big spans, no chance if anything hits a pier.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
3 minutes ago, adb968008 said:

Shocking, and for those on the bridge terrifying… they literally had no where to go.

 

Ive seen a lot of these style bridges in the US, long thin, often look very insecure but cover big spans, no chance if anything hits a pier.

They do indeed look flimsy - but are evidently up to the job if unmolested. And that's the problem - the irresistible force of a large ship drifting, as apparently here, would require enormous, probably almost impossible, levels of protection. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
12 minutes ago, Oldddudders said:

They do indeed look flimsy - but are evidently up to the job if unmolested. And that's the problem - the irresistible force of a large ship drifting, as apparently here, would require enormous, probably almost impossible, levels of protection. 

I've wondered about that. The kinetic energy in even a slow-moving container ship will be immense, is it actually possible to protect against something like this? I suppose you could go to really big extremes by building every pier on an artificial island but that could well be beyond practical.

  • Agree 3
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

The only saving grace, if you can call it that, was that it happened at 1.30 a.m.

very small crumb of comfort - but sadly not for those affected.

  • Agree 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
13 minutes ago, Reorte said:

I've wondered about that. The kinetic energy in even a slow-moving container ship will be immense, is it actually possible to protect against something like this? I suppose you could go to really big extremes by building every pier on an artificial island but that could well be beyond practical.

Agreed, most of us are aware of what it takes to stop a train load of containers in an emergency. How many trainloads of containers can a 300 metre vessel carry? Add to which water is even less resistant than steel wheels on steel rails.

  • Like 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Reorte said:

I've wondered about that. The kinetic energy in even a slow-moving container ship will be immense, is it actually possible to protect against something like this? I suppose you could go to really big extremes by building every pier on an artificial island but that could well be beyond practical.

 

I doubt you could do anything more than isolate the sections so that only the impacted one comes down. There are probably many engineering reasons why even that is impractical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not unknown for simulations to be used to determine whether ships can operate safely under bridges, as here for example:

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-03/icebreaker-nuyina-hit-hobart-tasman-bridge-in-modelling/103158228

 

I'm no conspiracy theorist but can't help wondering about how a terrorist might infiltrate the ship's crew to cause such an incident deliberately. It might only take one man in the engine-room to hit an emergency stop button at the crucial moment.

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I know that this is closing the stable door after the horse has bolted, but I can see a case of tugs being compulsory where large ships are required to navigate through bridges.

 

My thoughts are with the missing and their families.

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Sounds like the ship got a mayday out and traffic was stopped as a result, so a quick response there probably saved lives.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 5
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The speed of collapse is unbelievable and one end literally pivots around the support. Fortunately the outer flat decks stayed up.

Trouble is once the forces are out of equilibrium its only going to end badly. Thank goodness it was not during rush hour. 

  • Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, Siberian Snooper said:

I know that this is closing the stable door after the horse has bolted, but I can see a case of tugs being compulsory where large ships are required to navigate through bridges.

 

My thoughts are with the missing and their families.

The flipside there is how many thousands of vessels successfully navigate under bridges without hitting them? What's the limit? No barges under Tower Bridge without tug escort?

 

The video of the collapse and the daylight footage is harrowing, we can only hope the casualty list remains short.

  • Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kevinlms said:

8 degrees C, according to reports. Plus whatever depth the water is. Not a good place to be.

 

Depth is 50' at the bridge location.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly not the first and unlikely to be the last case of a bridge being demolished by a passing ship.  Need hefty barriers around the pillar bases to protect them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Reorte said:

Sounds like the ship got a mayday out and traffic was stopped as a result, so a quick response there probably saved lives.

 

No, there was still traffic traveling across the bridge plus some maintenance staff/vehicles working on the bridge at the time.  Luckily very little traffic due to the time. Not to make light of it in any way but it could have been much, much worse!

  • Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...