Jump to content
 

Dave F more photos added 21 June from 1947 to 1955ish


Recommended Posts

This evenings batch now,most were taken at Loughborough in June 1955 - the wedding guests are part of a family wedding.

 

attachicon.gifLoughborough Midland Ivatt 4MT 43045 down pass June 55Scan-130526-0016.jpg

Loughborough Midland Ivatt 4MT 43045 down pass June 55Scan-130526-0016

 

 

You can make any job a White Collar occupation. Just takes a little application.

 

The Nim.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

The footbridge was on the Shepshed side of the road bridge. The footpath over the pipe wasn't a public footpath - it was just for private water company access so I assume wouldn't have been mentioned anywhere officially ? - strange that they still need a path over the pipe bridge with no trains present !??

 

Cheers

Paul

 

Thanks Paul

 

Once again the bridge registers can mislead the unwary! It certainly doesn't mention a footpath across the pipe bridge.

 

Was the Thorpe Road footbridge on the Loughborough or Shepshed side of bridge No.29?

 

Andy

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Utterly pointless crap carp about a particularly successful picture, but I think in 130526-0032 D4 was a class 44, not 45?

 

 Oops!  Yet another thing I do know really - but not today!  I need my brain in gear when typing.

 

David

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

A couple more from Rugby this evening, then a quick look at Grantham and a trip to Derby.  I am less sure about the exact location of the one captioned as Long Eaton, so if anyone knows better.....

 

post-5613-0-15998800-1370800135_thumb.jpg

Rugby Rebuilt Royal Scot up parcels c1960 Scan-130526-0033

 

 

post-5613-0-57200700-1370800130_thumb.jpg

Rugby Coronation class up ex pass c1960 Scan-130526-0034

 

 

post-5613-0-22040800-1370800122_thumb.jpg

Grantham B1 down ex pass c1959 perhaps Scan-130526-0040

 

 

post-5613-0-54949700-1370800126_thumb.jpg

Beeston South Junction view from rear of dmu c1959 Scan-130526-0041

 

 

post-5613-0-03692900-1370800107_thumb.jpg

Derby 8F up coal c1959 Scan-130526-0042

 

 

post-5613-0-55010700-1370800101_thumb.jpg

Derby 8F 48081 le c1959 Scan-130526-0043

 

 

post-5613-0-61593700-1370800116_thumb.jpg

Derby Crab up goods c1959 Scan-130526-0045

 

 

post-5613-0-74461800-1370800111_thumb.jpg

Derby BR Class 5 73138 up ex pass c1959 Scan-130526-0046

Edited by DaveF
  • Like 17
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello David,

Always good to see pictures of the Derby area. I live in hope that you might have some more of Chaddesden and Spondon tucked away somewhere..........

 

Just a couple of points:

130526-0041 looks very much like Beeston South Junction to me . The freight is waiting on the Up Goods whilst we're approaching Beeston station from the Nottm direction. The sidings on the left is the Down Yard - later the site of Nottm Freightliner Terminal.

 

Daybrook - though at first sight something of a backwater on the "Back Line", even at that period the station and surroundings were immaculate. Of course this was a heavily-used freight route to Colwick.I can understand why your Dad thought it a good location to model.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hello David,

Always good to see pictures of the Derby area. I live in hope that you might have some more of Chaddesden and Spondon tucked away somewhere..........

 

Just a couple of points:

130526-0041 looks very much like Beeston South Junction to me . The freight is waiting on the Up Goods whilst we're approaching Beeston station from the Nottm direction. The sidings on the left is the Down Yard - later the site of Nottm Freightliner Terminal.

 

Daybrook - though at first sight something of a backwater on the "Back Line", even at that period the station and surroundings were immaculate. Of course this was a heavily-used freight route to Colwick.I can understand why your Dad thought it a good location to model.

 

Thanks very much for this, I've amended the caption.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Utterly pointless crap carp about a particularly successful picture, but I think in 130526-0032 D4 was a class 44, not 45?

In my day they were just "Peaks"!

 

Keith

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

'Derby 8F 48081 le c1959 Scan-130526-0043'

 

The 8F in this picture looks very clean compared with the one above it, albeit at the same location and year; would there be any particular reason for this one being so turned out when the others appear so grubby?  Apologies for my ignorance, it's just that I do like the look of a shiny black loco and was wondering...

 

Thanks

 

David

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I think "Trent" is Rugby - it's certainly LNWR whilst Trent was MR - the junction with the Birmingham line heading off the the left perhaps ?

Correct DAS, it's Rugby No.7. The Pratt truss style gantry was the Homes for the Up Fast and Up Slow coming from Newbold. The 2-headed colour light in #765 was the Up Birmingham Inner Home. The 3-doll semaphore was the Up Leamington Home. The straight post with the disc at the foot read Down Goods to Down Leamington and the 3-arm dwarf was in the Down sidings

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I think "Trent" is Rugby - it's certainly LNWR whilst Trent was MR - the junction with the Birmingham line heading off the the left perhaps ?

 

 

Correct DAS, it's Rugby No.7. The Pratt truss style gantry was the Homes for the Up Fast and Up Slow coming from Newbold. The 2-headed colour light in #765 was the Up Birmingham Inner Home. The 3-doll semaphore was the Up Leamington Home. The straight post with the disc at the foot read Down Goods to Down Leamington and the 3-arm dwarf was in the Down sidings

 

Many thanks to you both, I thought the signals were wrong - and in a later view still to come I think there is what even I know to be an LNWR box in the background.

 

David

Edited by DaveF
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

This evening's set are all on the Great Northern, but not the ECML.

 

post-5613-0-48511600-1370888496_thumb.jpg

Skegness K1 c1955 Scan-130526-0060

 

 

post-5613-0-66556200-1370888491_thumb.jpg

Firsby J39 Skegness to Nottingham c1955 Scan-130526-0063

 

 

post-5613-0-13175900-1370888472_thumb.jpg

Boston Grand Sluice Bridge 1955 Scan-130526-0064

 

 

post-5613-0-22018400-1370888466_thumb.jpg

Boston Derby Lightweight dmu E79621 1955 Scan-130526-0065

 

 

post-5613-0-96103700-1370888476_thumb.jpg

Boston Stump across goods yard 1955 Scan-130526-0066

 

 

post-5613-0-59606400-1370888485_thumb.jpg

Colwick J6 WD and O4s 1955 Scan-130526-0067

 

 

post-5613-0-15238900-1370888489_thumb.jpg

Colwick J52 68852 1955 Scan-130526-0068

 

 

post-5613-0-91338600-1370888479_thumb.jpg

Colwick cabless V2 1955 Scan-130526-0069

 

 

David

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

"Trent Jubilee class ex pass c1952 Scan-130526-0050"

 

Hello.

 

May I suggest that the height of the handrail suggests that the loco is, in fact, a Black 5 (3B boiler), not a Jubilee (3A boiler); and it's not a rebuilt Jubilee (2A boiler) as the top feed isn't on the first ring. Anyone agree?

 

As ever, an extraordinarily varied selection of rattlingly good images. Thank you so much for sharing.

 

Cheers,

 

BR(W).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

"Trent Jubilee class ex pass c1952 Scan-130526-0050"

 

Hello.

 

May I suggest that the height of the handrail suggests that the loco is, in fact, a Black 5 (3B boiler), not a Jubilee (3A boiler); and it's not a rebuilt Jubilee (2A boiler) as the top feed isn't on the first ring. Anyone agree?

 

As ever, an extraordinarily varied selection of rattlingly good images. Thank you so much for sharing.

 

Cheers,

 

BR(W).

 

Thanks for suggesting this.  I've just blown up the original scan to have a close look at the loco, I can see your point about the boiler type.  Also there is no nameplate on very close inspection, so I've altered the caption.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

The pictures of Colwick highlight what a large complex this was and also as a secondary point, its loss demonstrates how savagely Nottingham was hit by the closures of the 50s and 60s. Was there any other large city that lost such a high proportion of its rail network as Nottingham did, including 2 of the 3 main routes to London?

 

ROB

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...