Nimbus Posted June 9, 2013 Share Posted June 9, 2013 This evenings batch now,most were taken at Loughborough in June 1955 - the wedding guests are part of a family wedding. Loughborough Midland Ivatt 4MT 43045 down pass June 55Scan-130526-0016.jpg Loughborough Midland Ivatt 4MT 43045 down pass June 55Scan-130526-0016 You can make any job a White Collar occupation. Just takes a little application. The Nim. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Popular Post DaveF Posted June 9, 2013 Author RMweb Gold Popular Post Share Posted June 9, 2013 (edited) Trips to Rugby, Daybrook and the old museum at York this afternoon, again from negatives. Daybrook c1954 Scan-130526-0023 Daybrook looking west c1954 Scan-130526-0024 Daybrook c1954 Scan-130526-0025 York old museum GNR Stirling Single c1955 Scan-130526-0026 York old museum Puffing Billy c1955 Scan-130526-0028 Rugby WD up goods and Class 40 down ex pass c1960 Scan-130526-0029 Rugby Coronation Class up ex pass c1960 Scan-130526-0031 Rugby Peak Class 45 D4 Great Gable up ex pass c1960 Scan-130526-0032 David Edited June 9, 2013 by DaveF 21 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
62613 Posted June 9, 2013 Share Posted June 9, 2013 School caps and long raincoats - takes you back! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rd84 Posted June 9, 2013 Share Posted June 9, 2013 Hi Andy, The footbridge was on the Shepshed side of the road bridge. The footpath over the pipe wasn't a public footpath - it was just for private water company access so I assume wouldn't have been mentioned anywhere officially ? - strange that they still need a path over the pipe bridge with no trains present !?? Cheers Paul Thanks Paul Once again the bridge registers can mislead the unwary! It certainly doesn't mention a footpath across the pipe bridge. Was the Thorpe Road footbridge on the Loughborough or Shepshed side of bridge No.29? Andy 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Oldddudders Posted June 9, 2013 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 9, 2013 Utterly pointless crap carp about a particularly successful picture, but I think in 130526-0032 D4 was a class 44, not 45? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold DaveF Posted June 9, 2013 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted June 9, 2013 Utterly pointless crap carp about a particularly successful picture, but I think in 130526-0032 D4 was a class 44, not 45? Oops! Yet another thing I do know really - but not today! I need my brain in gear when typing. David 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold DaveF Posted June 9, 2013 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted June 9, 2013 (edited) A couple more from Rugby this evening, then a quick look at Grantham and a trip to Derby. I am less sure about the exact location of the one captioned as Long Eaton, so if anyone knows better..... Rugby Rebuilt Royal Scot up parcels c1960 Scan-130526-0033 Rugby Coronation class up ex pass c1960 Scan-130526-0034 Grantham B1 down ex pass c1959 perhaps Scan-130526-0040 Beeston South Junction view from rear of dmu c1959 Scan-130526-0041 Derby 8F up coal c1959 Scan-130526-0042 Derby 8F 48081 le c1959 Scan-130526-0043 Derby Crab up goods c1959 Scan-130526-0045 Derby BR Class 5 73138 up ex pass c1959 Scan-130526-0046 Edited June 9, 2013 by DaveF 17 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Kazmierczak Posted June 9, 2013 Share Posted June 9, 2013 Hello David, Always good to see pictures of the Derby area. I live in hope that you might have some more of Chaddesden and Spondon tucked away somewhere.......... Just a couple of points: 130526-0041 looks very much like Beeston South Junction to me . The freight is waiting on the Up Goods whilst we're approaching Beeston station from the Nottm direction. The sidings on the left is the Down Yard - later the site of Nottm Freightliner Terminal. Daybrook - though at first sight something of a backwater on the "Back Line", even at that period the station and surroundings were immaculate. Of course this was a heavily-used freight route to Colwick.I can understand why your Dad thought it a good location to model. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold DaveF Posted June 9, 2013 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted June 9, 2013 Hello David, Always good to see pictures of the Derby area. I live in hope that you might have some more of Chaddesden and Spondon tucked away somewhere.......... Just a couple of points: 130526-0041 looks very much like Beeston South Junction to me . The freight is waiting on the Up Goods whilst we're approaching Beeston station from the Nottm direction. The sidings on the left is the Down Yard - later the site of Nottm Freightliner Terminal. Daybrook - though at first sight something of a backwater on the "Back Line", even at that period the station and surroundings were immaculate. Of course this was a heavily-used freight route to Colwick.I can understand why your Dad thought it a good location to model. Thanks very much for this, I've amended the caption. David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium melmerby Posted June 9, 2013 RMweb Premium Share Posted June 9, 2013 Utterly pointless crap carp about a particularly successful picture, but I think in 130526-0032 D4 was a class 44, not 45?In my day they were just "Peaks"! Keith 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Grafarman Posted June 9, 2013 RMweb Premium Share Posted June 9, 2013 'Derby 8F 48081 le c1959 Scan-130526-0043' The 8F in this picture looks very clean compared with the one above it, albeit at the same location and year; would there be any particular reason for this one being so turned out when the others appear so grubby? Apologies for my ignorance, it's just that I do like the look of a shiny black loco and was wondering... Thanks David 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Kazmierczak Posted June 9, 2013 Share Posted June 9, 2013 (edited) Presumably recently ex-works. Notice the "overhead live wire" flashes, that were just starting to appear then. Edited June 9, 2013 by Western Sunset Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagrizz Posted June 9, 2013 Share Posted June 9, 2013 Presumably recently ex-works. Notice the "overhead live wire" flashes, that were just starting to appear then. I thought overhead warning flashes started to appear in 1961 - or have I got that wrong? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Kazmierczak Posted June 9, 2013 Share Posted June 9, 2013 I thought overhead warning flashes started to appear in 1961 - or have I got that wrong? I've got it down somewhere as 1960, but these sort of things are rather variable datewise, as to their actual application onto locos and stock. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Popular Post DaveF Posted June 10, 2013 Author RMweb Gold Popular Post Share Posted June 10, 2013 (edited) It's time now for this afternoon's batch, again from negatives. Most of them are in Derbyshire, once again some don't have locos. Google Earth proved very useful in finding the location of the C&HP bridge -fortunately it is still there on Street View. A quick note about all the photo dates - c (circa) before the year indicates this is the best "guess" from all the information I have, but could be about a year either way - e.g. the recent Derby ones are supposed to be 1959 from the evidence of my own early photos, but just could be 1960. Today there is one captioned as Trent, I'm not quite certain about this. Image " Scan-130526-0006" from post 765 is also supposed to be Trent, and there are a few more at the same location to follow in a day or so. What do others think? Trent Class 5 ex pass c1952 Scan-130526-0050 Dunford Bridge EM1 Class 76 E26027 down goods c1962 Scan-130526-0051 Tissington c1954Scan-130526-0053 Tissington c1954 Scan-130526-0054 Tissington 8F c1954 Scan-130526-0055 Cromford and High Peak bridge over unclassified road from Hopton to Via Gellia A5012 c1954 Scan-130526-0056 Cromford and High Peak bridge over unclassified road from Hopton to Via Gellia A5012 c1954 Scan-130526-0057 Skegness J39 64767 c1955 Scan-130526-0059 David Edited June 10, 2013 by DaveF 23 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Grafarman Posted June 10, 2013 RMweb Premium Share Posted June 10, 2013 Those shots of Tissington look really picture-postcard; would make a lovely subject for a layout! More please! David 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold beast66606 Posted June 10, 2013 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 10, 2013 I think "Trent" is Rugby - it's certainly LNWR whilst Trent was MR - the junction with the Birmingham line heading off the the left perhaps ? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold TheSignalEngineer Posted June 10, 2013 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 10, 2013 I think "Trent" is Rugby - it's certainly LNWR whilst Trent was MR - the junction with the Birmingham line heading off the the left perhaps ? Correct DAS, it's Rugby No.7. The Pratt truss style gantry was the Homes for the Up Fast and Up Slow coming from Newbold. The 2-headed colour light in #765 was the Up Birmingham Inner Home. The 3-doll semaphore was the Up Leamington Home. The straight post with the disc at the foot read Down Goods to Down Leamington and the 3-arm dwarf was in the Down sidings 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold DaveF Posted June 10, 2013 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted June 10, 2013 (edited) I think "Trent" is Rugby - it's certainly LNWR whilst Trent was MR - the junction with the Birmingham line heading off the the left perhaps ? Correct DAS, it's Rugby No.7. The Pratt truss style gantry was the Homes for the Up Fast and Up Slow coming from Newbold. The 2-headed colour light in #765 was the Up Birmingham Inner Home. The 3-doll semaphore was the Up Leamington Home. The straight post with the disc at the foot read Down Goods to Down Leamington and the 3-arm dwarf was in the Down sidings Many thanks to you both, I thought the signals were wrong - and in a later view still to come I think there is what even I know to be an LNWR box in the background. David Edited June 10, 2013 by DaveF Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold DaveF Posted June 10, 2013 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted June 10, 2013 This evening's set are all on the Great Northern, but not the ECML. Skegness K1 c1955 Scan-130526-0060 Firsby J39 Skegness to Nottingham c1955 Scan-130526-0063 Boston Grand Sluice Bridge 1955 Scan-130526-0064 Boston Derby Lightweight dmu E79621 1955 Scan-130526-0065 Boston Stump across goods yard 1955 Scan-130526-0066 Colwick J6 WD and O4s 1955 Scan-130526-0067 Colwick J52 68852 1955 Scan-130526-0068 Colwick cabless V2 1955 Scan-130526-0069 David 16 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BR(W) Posted June 10, 2013 Share Posted June 10, 2013 "Trent Jubilee class ex pass c1952 Scan-130526-0050" Hello. May I suggest that the height of the handrail suggests that the loco is, in fact, a Black 5 (3B boiler), not a Jubilee (3A boiler); and it's not a rebuilt Jubilee (2A boiler) as the top feed isn't on the first ring. Anyone agree? As ever, an extraordinarily varied selection of rattlingly good images. Thank you so much for sharing. Cheers, BR(W). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold DaveF Posted June 10, 2013 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted June 10, 2013 "Trent Jubilee class ex pass c1952 Scan-130526-0050" Hello. May I suggest that the height of the handrail suggests that the loco is, in fact, a Black 5 (3B boiler), not a Jubilee (3A boiler); and it's not a rebuilt Jubilee (2A boiler) as the top feed isn't on the first ring. Anyone agree? As ever, an extraordinarily varied selection of rattlingly good images. Thank you so much for sharing. Cheers, BR(W). Thanks for suggesting this. I've just blown up the original scan to have a close look at the loco, I can see your point about the boiler type. Also there is no nameplate on very close inspection, so I've altered the caption. David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffP Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 Can anyone suggest why the V2 had had it's cab removed? Wouldn't that have been a works job? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob F Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 The pictures of Colwick highlight what a large complex this was and also as a secondary point, its loss demonstrates how savagely Nottingham was hit by the closures of the 50s and 60s. Was there any other large city that lost such a high proportion of its rail network as Nottingham did, including 2 of the 3 main routes to London? ROB 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
45568 Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 The Derby lightweight DMU has the same number as Bachmann's 32-516A.Coincidence or what? Cheers, Peter C. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now