Jump to content
 

A Nod To Brent - a friendly thread, filled with frivolity, cream teas and pasties. Longing for the happy days in the South Hams 1947.


gwrrob
 Share

Recommended Posts

Shed looks good, suspect it will be interesting and fiddly to paint depending on how crisp the casting is.

I assume it comes with doors?

 

Stonework colour would vary depending on where the area it is sited, West Country would be good!!!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Chuck some buttresses and some etched windows on the Dapol kit, should give you about the same result I would have thought.

Although I haven't seen it in the flesh to be fair, it is a beautiful model all the same.

Have it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My first reaction was "It's a very nice shed", but I prefer the one I built for Helstonish.

 

Not because its a better model, it's not, but CK hits the nail on the head, its not "Western".

.

I'm sure you could do something better by capturing the western "feel"

 

All the best with your deliberations.

 

.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Bachmann warflats in two liveries.

 

attachicon.gifDSCN2707 (2).JPG

 

attachicon.gifDSCN2710 (2).JPG

That Mogul is a neat Mogul and will sell in hundreds, but it needs to be covered in crud as real Moguls need to be filthy.

I quite like that little shed. It looks quite North Cornwallish.

Thanks Rob. Good pics (in which I can not spy any SR stuff hiding......boooooooooo; SE&CR doesn't count).

Philth

Edited by Mallard60022
Link to post
Share on other sites

As to the engine shed, how about the one at Princetown for a more local and western look. Barry Ten of this parish built a very nice model of it for his Paynestown layout:

post-13158-0-04581900-1511726261.jpg

http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/blog/257/entry-3777-paynestown-a-valleys-terminus-in-00/

 

 

A lasercut model is also available (https://railmodel.co.uk/products/engine-shed-princetown-4mm).

Should be simple enough to shorten it if you want a smaller model.

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

On the loco shed front, what about Kingsbridge?

 

Looks a very straight forward scratch build

 

http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/k/kingsbridge/kingsbridge(c1935)old8.jpg

Had a look at that one as well, but I liked the Princetown shed better. But the Kingsbridge shed should indeed be very simple to scratchbuilt. There is hardly any architectural finesse to it...

Devondynosoar118 built one, albeit in n scale:

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The townstreet sheds are interesting but look a bit chunky and lack finesse IMO. I would also agree with CK and others that the single road shed doesn't look very Western. 

 

PS, I don't know who you are either    ;-p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Had a look at that one as well, but I liked the Princetown shed better. But the Kingsbridge shed should indeed be very simple to scratchbuilt. There is hardly any architectural finesse to it...

Devondynosoar118 built one, albeit in n scale:

 

http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php/blog/574/entry-6240-engine-shed/

http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/34552-kingsbridge-branch-n/&do=findComment&comment=370056

It would certainly need the water tower as well to go with it to add interest,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I had thought the couplings looked rather obtrusive in the normal position and I tried inverting them , then stumbled on Dunsignalling’s thread ‘Useful modification for Roco and Hornby couplers’ where the topic had already been discussed

 

They function as normal - except you can’t uncouple with a ramp but the advantage is that there is much less of the bulky coupling visible between the coaches because they are some 4mm higher allowing daylight to be seen between the bogies.

 

It appeals to me as my track is at eye level!

 

They do stay firmly coupled as gravity does not affect the mechanism.

Thanks Mike. I had thought that gravity might come into play. I use them for semi-permanently coupled coaches, so uncoupling with a ramp is irrelevant. I might give them a try, although as my track is not at eye level it might not make much difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I think the single road stone engine shed is spoilt by the large thick and dark window arches. If these could be made less obvious and a more West Country stone colour used it would look good in Tigley

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Yes Robin..this one caught my eye as well.......But Larry Goddard..who should know,says the paint job is incorrect for its era.I think he said it should be lined.....don't know...

 

I'm sorry but the great man is wrong. :read: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

As to the engine shed, how about the one at Princetown for a more local and western look. Barry Ten of this parish built a very nice model of it for his Paynestown layout:

attachicon.gifblogentry-6720-127557276693.jpg

http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/blog/257/entry-3777-paynestown-a-valleys-terminus-in-00/

 

 

A lasercut model is also available (https://railmodel.co.uk/products/engine-shed-princetown-4mm).

Should be simple enough to shorten it if you want a smaller model.

Nice West Country prototype, Robin, and not too far from Brent, either.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...