Jump to content
 

Dave F's photos - ongoing - more added each day


Recommended Posts

J3436 more likely assorted empty stock than parcels - there's a GUV, CK, postal van, a sleeper and possibly a Mk1 suburban brake vehicle, then two more Mk1 passenger coaches, not to mention the 5xxx headcode.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 minute ago, eastwestdivide said:

J3436 more likely assorted empty stock than parcels - there's a GUV, CK, postal van, a sleeper and possibly a Mk1 suburban brake vehicle, then two more Mk1 passenger coaches, not to mention the 5xxx headcode.

 

Many thanks.

 

The headcode and formation is a bit of a giveaway.

 

David

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hi, Dave. I like the Swayfield photo’s which are full of interest. In J5443, with class 47, 47412, on an up express in September, 1976, you can see it’s another eight carriage formation. I guess the two first class carriages might have enough seats and the four second class carriages too. But it does seem a bit limited if there was a sudden rush of passengers. Hopefully such a situation rarely happened. 

 

With warmest regards,

 

Rob.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eastwestdivide said:

J3436 more likely assorted empty stock than parcels - there's a GUV, CK, postal van, a sleeper and possibly a Mk1 suburban brake vehicle, then two more Mk1 passenger coaches, not to mention the 5xxx headcode.

It's a collection of rolling stock going to works for attention. I can't find it in a working timetable yet but they did run regularly.

  • Agree 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember there being a working like this from Litchurch Lane, Derby, to Crewe (and possibly beyond) which used to pass my workplace in Alsager mid-afternoon. This would have been 1979, I believe.  Sometimes, when there was non-airbraked stock in the formation, it would have a goods brake van at the rear.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5L30 (J3436) was an almost daily M-F down working, as mentioned above it was an early afternoon ECS working from London to (IIRC) York Works, conveying stock for attention. It was still running as late as mid-1975. It may have continued running beyond that date but most of my linesiding tended to be in the evening by then - and by 1976, of course, headcodes had been dispensed with, so it becomes difficult to identify anything in my rare afternoon notes that may have been that train. I don't recall it ever being headed by anything more powerful than a Class 31 and it generally passed Peterborough between around 14:10 and 14:45, although I do have a couple of notes of it running marginally later than that.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 01/05/2019 at 21:44, Enterprisingwestern said:

 

They aren't manholes, just drain covers for rainwater/sluice drainage channels.

 

Mike.

It looks most definitely like a UTX (under track crossing) for signalling cables and would be fun to try and lift off if there was a cable fault.

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hi, Dave. I like the north west photo’s which is quite a change from the ECML.  It’s most interesting to see the class 507 EMU’s  going about their daily work. A mainly unsung class of train.

In the last photo’, J7980, at Southport with a class 105 and a class 120 on a Manchester Victoria to Southport service  in  June, 1983, the class 105, on enlarging the photo’ is actually a hybrid two car unit. It’s formed of a class 105 DTSL, and a class 104 DMBS. You can tell from the three and a half windows between the passenger doors, the tumblehome, the guards van windows and exhaust pipes. The roof vents are different too. 

 

With warmest regards,

 

Rob.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, 43110andyb said:

It looks most definitely like a UTX (under track crossing) for signalling cables and would be fun to try and lift off if there was a cable fault.

Would have to disconnect the rodding, which would mean signing the points out in the register, which would most likely mean a possession (doubt you would get long enough "between trains" even back then). Quite a palaver!

  • Agree 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
4 hours ago, 31A said:

J7980 - what a strange signal!

 

I was thinking that too. One blue spectacle and one green, but neither lit or shielded from being backlit, so presumably only used in daylight hours??

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it just me, or the angle of the photographs, but the footsteps on the Class 507s seem very large. Was this a factor of the tumblehome on the units or some unique clearance issues on Merseyrail?

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ulverston is a lovely station and the town is ok, it has a nice cinema and Stan Laurel museum. Also the 16c Swarthmoor Hall is close by if you have an interest in Quaker History. 

Edited by flapland
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hi, Dave. I like the Cumbrian Coast Line photo’s which show some of the scenery the line passes through. I agree, Ulverston station is delightful, and it would also make a splendid model. In C8737, at Ulverston, with a two car class 108 DMU, car numbers 54235 (DTSL) and 53951 (DMBS) on a Lancaster to Barrow service on the 6th August, 1987, on the bottom of the cab of the DMBS you can see how damage from repeated hitting from the air pipe has been patch painted. The yellow is somewhat different from the rest of the yellow on that cab end.

 

With warmest regards,

 

Rob.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 18/02/2019 at 16:58, Fat Controller said:

J7392: the little shunter coupled to the ballast hopper was owned by a company called Grant-Lyon-Eagre, I believe; they were a Scunthorpe-based subsidiary of British Steel, specialising in track work at industrial sites. The shunter had worked on installation works at Eurotunnel's Cheriton terminal, and Dolland's Moor yard back in 1992/3.; it was positively dwarfed by some of the German locos it worked alongside. 

C8809 has a YE Janus, not a Sentinel.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, melmerby said:

Nice set from Carnforth but C1177 doesn't look like a B1, it looks like another Stanier loco next to 44932.

 

 

 

 

As Captain Mainwaring might have said "I wondered who would be the first to notice that".

 

A simple captioning error - as usual - never study the photo you are captioning.

 

David

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...