Jump to content
RMweb
 

Peterborough North


great northern

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Tony Wright said:

Hornby's brilliant SR GBL luggage van. And put it into one of my express freights (the fourth vehicle), only to be told by one commentator that such vans never left the Southern Region. 

 

Really? 

 

My understanding (for what it's worth) was the such vehicles stayed largely parochial in the early BR period (as did ex-GWR types?), but as the 1950s wore on - and certainly by the 1960s - they became much more common user and were seen over the length and breadth of the country. I've seen (1960s) picture of them at Aberdeen, marshalled into fish trains (were their floors strengthened or were they suitably strong anyway? Anti-corrosive coverings?)

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/03/2024 at 05:12, 31A said:

Bachmann are actually bringing out a completely retooled Thompson BG which will no doubt be streets ahead of the current, dated, model.

They've arrived apparently as I've just received an email from Bachmann announcing that.

Andrew

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
12 hours ago, Woodcock29 said:

They've arrived apparently as I've just received an email from Bachmann announcing that.

Andrew

 

Thanks for the heads up Andrew, I'll expect a call from Monk Bar Models sometime soon then!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, great northern said:

Framlingham again. I never saw the loco, but was very impressed with the castle when we went on a family holiday to Southwold in my early teens. Proper castle, that. Mind you, we hadn't been to North Wales at that time. Here's 61603 coming in...

 

and then coming off.

41603off.JPG.b62ffcd9ad39ab9ce039864778775f30.JPG

Coming off to go to Spital Bridge locomotive shed for coal, water and turning.

 

A bay window at the Spital Bridge end of the layout room and you could cram in the essential parts of the shed. A few Black fives and 8Fs for the sidings, job done.

  • Like 2
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  • Round of applause 1
  • Funny 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, Clive Mortimore said:

Coming off to go to Spital Bridge locomotive shed for coal, water and turning.

 

A bay window at the Spital Bridge end of the layout room and you could cram in the essential parts of the shed. A few Black fives and 8Fs for the sidings, job done.

Nice try Clive. Actually, it is on its way to New England, but apart from that it would be a good idea, provided I didn't live in a conservation area, had enough spare cash, and we could figure out a way to get up to build it, as it is directly above the pond.

 

Seriously, I wish it could be included, as it would mean I could have some locos which are otherwise always just off scene.

  • Like 1
  • Friendly/supportive 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
Posted (edited)
On 08/03/2024 at 19:38, LNER4479 said:

My understanding (for what it's worth) was the such vehicles stayed largely parochial in the early BR period (as did ex-GWR types?), but as the 1950s wore on - and certainly by the 1960s - they became much more common user and were seen over the length and breadth of the country. I've seen (1960s) picture of them at Aberdeen, marshalled into fish trains (were their floors strengthened or were they suitably strong anyway? Anti-corrosive coverings?)

 

On 08/03/2024 at 19:45, jwealleans said:

The 4 wheel ones were obviously very popular as they're all over the place (certainly in East Anglia) by very early in the 1950s.

I couldn't resist further investigation. With help from Steve and Clive I have established that during the HMRS survey between 4th and 10th July 1958, the following were recorded:-

 

2 Bogie brake vans.  1 2 axle brake.  At least 9 PMVs. All were in either KX-Peterborough or KX-Grantham stopping trains, a couple of which had one on every day seen. As Jonathan says, the four wheel PMVs seem to have been very common sights on the Eastern in the 50s. There may, of course, have been others in either parcels trains or in other local services. I have a photo of an Immingham B1 with Class B lamp shunting a PMV at PN, so probably an E. LIncs train, and I know I've seen plenty of others.

Edited by great northern
spelling
  • Informative/Useful 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is such a perfect image, composition, lighting, depth and so on - what a joy!

 

Never mind restricted light photographs, so reminiscent of those days of my youth by the level crossing  at Offord!

 

Anthony

  • Like 3
  • Agree 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 08/03/2024 at 19:45, jwealleans said:

The 4 wheel ones were obviously very popular as they're all over the place (certainly in East Anglia) by very early in the 1950s.

 

My current favourite in this regard is a June 1950 view of a South Manchester transfer freight with a 3F 0-6-0 pulling 3 LNER sleeper wagons, an LNER pipe wagon, 2 LMS 10ft wb vans, 2 SR 4 wheel PLVs/PMVs, an NER BZ, and a long string of opens/minerals bringing up the rear.

 

Regards,

Simon

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
14 hours ago, great northern said:

Possible sunny periods are apparently no longer possible. If this carries on I shall have to resort to artificial light. In fact I shall definitely have to, as there are only two images left. Here's 60016 again, my favourite panorama from under the bridge.

1516far.JPG.ac2d3015e6a534b30937fce3c1bfcf54.JPG

Any photo showing the underside of Crescent Bridge is a winner for me.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I have encountered an interesting conundrum, and wonder if anyone can help with answers, or can point me in the direction of someone who could.

 

I shall soon be receiving a Gresley locker composite to Dia 8, which Steve @31A has built for me as a conversion from a Hornby donor. When built, these carriages had two first class compartments seating six passengers in each, plus a "coupe" compartment seating a further three first class. There were also four third class compartments, each seating eight, so in all Harris shows the seating as 15/32. There is then a little asterix, which until now I had missed which shows below the following:- "some later with intermediate armrests and seating reduced by eight". That would at first sight mean 15/24.

 

However, when I consult the 1958 CWN I find a CK 2-four and a half, seating 12 first and 36 second class passengers. The only way that can be explained, as I see it, is that the first class coupe has been changed to second class, seating four passengers. That would indeed make 12/36. I have also found entries for CK two/four and a half with an annotation stating "First class compartment to be labelled for use of second class passengers." The total seating is then given as 39 second class. That must mean surely 2 compartments seating 12, and four and a half seating 6 in the four second class compartments, and three in the former first coupe. That would be consistent with the annotation in Harris.

 

Then I turned to the Express Publications M&GN passenger services 1954, which has long puzzled me, as it shows a large number of trains with Composite corridor (2-4), and a few with Composite corridor (2-5). As built, relying on Harris, there were none of either of these. I'm afraid I assumed Express had got it wrong. But, based on my earlier calculations , it would appear that the first coupe was in some cases altered to second class. In that case 2-5 becomes more understandable, if the coupe is counted as one compartment. 2-4 though is, to me, more of a problem, unless the coupe was no longer in use.

 

The sticking point is that Harris says nothing about later conversion of the coupe to second class, or indeed put out of use. I've searched the internet, but can find nothing at all to support that. I just can't see what else can be reconciled with the entries in the CWN and Express though.

 

Any comments, suggestions, explaining how I've got the whole thing round my neck, or giving me the identity of a man or woman who can throw light on this would be gratefully received.

  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
  • Friendly/supportive 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...