RMweb Gold DaveF Posted March 12, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted March 12, 2018 Hi, Dave. The Chester photos are fantastic and thought provoking. I think that’s the first accident to be shown in your thread. It makes a sobering sight, and I agree that it would be at least twice as long, if not longer, before the railway could be reopened if it had happened today. With warmest regards, Rob. It's not quite the first, but the previous ones were a long time ago. There were some more photos of the Chester accident in March 2015 (including a poorer copy of the first photo). Further back in October 2014 there were photos of a derailment of a Peak at British Gypsum Works at Ruschcliffe Halt on the Great Central. If you put in the place name and choose "This Topic" the RMWeb search facility will bring them up. Regards, David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
avonside1563 Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 Hi, Dave. I like the Foxfield Railway photos. I particularly like the engine shed in C2459, at Dilhorne, 28th September, 1975. It would make a most delightful model, especially with it next to a coal mine. With warmest regards, Rob. The gradient out of the engine shed at Foxfield was 1 in 11, the brickwork in the back of the shed was a different colour to the rest of the building for obvious reasons! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Popular Post DaveF Posted March 13, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Popular Post Share Posted March 13, 2018 Some Grassington branch photos today. It changed a lot between 1965 and 1973. Grassington BR Class 4MT 75039 Aug 65 J289 Grassington Class 4 75041 Dec 66 J721 Cracoe Tilcon ex BR 15231 Aug 73 J3359 Cracoe Tilcon Class 31 running round Aug 73 J3360 Cracoe Tilcon ex BR 12083 & Hibberd 4wdm Aug 73 J3361 David 33 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMS2968 Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 J3361 is a scene I know very well, having made regular visits to friends then living in Pateley Bridge, Those stop blocks were and still are the usual stabling point for the resident shunter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium brushman47544 Posted March 13, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 13, 2018 Some Grassington branch photos today. It changed a lot between 1965 and 1973. Grassington BR Class 4MT 75039 Aug 65 J289.jpg Grassington BR Class 4MT 75039 Aug 65 J289 Grassington Class 4 75041 Dec 66 J721.jpg Grassington Class 4 75041 Dec 66 J721 Cracoe Tilcon ex BR CLass 12 Aug 73 J3359.jpg Cracoe Tilcon ex BR 15231 Aug 73 J3359 Cracoe Tilcon Class 31 running round Aug 73 J3360.jpg Cracoe Tilcon Class 31 running round Aug 73 J3360 Cracoe Tilcon ex BR Class 11 12083 Aug 73 J3361.jpg Cracoe Tilcon ex BR 12083 & Hibberd 4wdm Aug 73 J3361 David Interesting. Were the two sets of buffers visible in J289 in the same place as those in J3361, or was the old station elsewhere? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMS2968 Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 The old station was further on in outskirts, if such they can be called, of Grassington itself, possibly half a mile further. They were set back from the road into the village, hidden by other buildings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Market65 Posted March 13, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 13, 2018 (edited) Hi, Dave. As always the photos of Grassington are magnificent. The first two convey so vividly, just how neglected and rundown steam on BR was in those final few years. 75039 and 75041 are in a most advanced state of decay, mobile rust machines! 15231, in J3359, at Cracoe, Tilcon works in August, 1973, is just so white from the limestone, with little trace of its original livery left. With warmest regards, Rob. Edited March 13, 2018 by Market65 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugd1022 Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 I quite like that route too when I worked for central the Norwich Leicester jobs we had were nearly all over old style proper railway I wonder how many times we have passed each other without knowing? A fair few times I dare say Russ! Which reminds of a happy coincidence which occurred a few years ago at Water Orton just before it was resignalled - I was working 6M22 from Hinksey to Stud Farm and had stopped at the old gantry on the goods, a few minutes later a New Street - Peterborough unit pulled up alongside me on the fast, I looked across and it was brother Mick driving. We managed a hastily posed photo leaning out of our respective cab doors but I've yet to see it! 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
freightliner_bond Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 I thought that today we'd have a look at the Tyne and Wear Metro as it was in the first half of the1980s. At this rime the trains were still in their original livery. Monkseaton Metro 4015 Tynemouth to Heworth April 82 C5655.jpg Monkseaton Metro 4015 Tynemouth to Heworth April 82 C5655 Paklmersville Tyne and Wear Metro to coast 25th June 84 C6547 (2).jpg Palmersville Tyne and Wear Metro to coast 25th June 84 C6547 Tynemouth 26th Oct 84 C6643.jpg Tynemouth 26th Oct 84 C6643 Pelaw Junction T&W Metro to Bankfoot going away 1st Aug 85 C7026.jpg Pelaw Junction T&W Metro to Bankfoot going away 1st Aug 85 C7026 Shiremoor T&W Metro 4086 to St James 5th Aug 85 C7045.jpg Shiremoor T&W Metro 4086 to St James 5th Aug 85 C7045 David And for comparison: https://goo.gl/images/YcBvjb https://goo.gl/images/qEPNrc Cheers Alan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackthorn Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 It's a Class 127 rebuilt as a parcels dmu. It was repainted green, I believe it is set 920 (55966 & 56967) (ex M51591 & M51610) M515191 had been painted green in 1983 and had been reclaimed from the NRM for further use, M51610 was repainted to match it, then they were renumbered as 55966 and 55967. 55966 had a blank headcode box and Express Parcels branding, 55967 was branded Newspapers (painted over by Oct 1988) and displayed 4 characters in the headcode box. David David, Many thanks for the information, I think it would make an interesting model. Mark. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold russ p Posted March 13, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 13, 2018 A fair few times I dare say Russ! Which reminds of a happy coincidence which occurred a few years ago at Water Orton just before it was resignalled - I was working 6M22 from Hinksey to Stud Farm and had stopped at the old gantry on the goods, a few minutes later a New Street - Peterborough unit pulled up alongside me on the fast, I looked across and it was brother Mick driving. We managed a hastily posed photo leaning out of our respective cab doors but I've yet to see it! Ahh right I didn't realise you were Mick's brother, I was on central with him I was a Norwich and Mick Cambridge. Where is he now? Last time I spoke to him he was doing something with an old mate of mine from Northumberland with a BSC alco 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Popular Post DaveF Posted March 14, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Popular Post Share Posted March 14, 2018 (edited) Once again we are on the Grantham to Nottingham Line, this time mainly around Radcliffe on Trent The photo at Sewstern Lane level crossing is the first level crossing east of Bottesford I've always known it by this name, in my Eastern Region Sectional Appendix it appears as Sewerston Lane level crossing. Rectory Junction Class 114 Nottingham to Skegness Sept 75 J4870 Rectory Junction River Trent viaduct Feb 77 J5626 Radcliffe on Trent Class 120 Nottingham to Skegness June 75 J4383 Radcliffe on Trent removing footbridge Dec 77 J5863 Sewstern Lane crossing 47468 Parkeston Quay to Glasgow and Edinburgh Aug 83 C6111 David Edited March 14, 2018 by DaveF 30 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Market65 Posted March 14, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 14, 2018 Hi, Dave. I like the Grantham to Nottingham photos. The river Trent is looking high in J5626, and in the last photo' at Sewstern Lane crossing, with 47468 on a Parkeston Quay to Glasgow and Edinburgh train in August, 1983, you can see how it may be accelerating with a good flurry of diesel fumes visible. With warmest regards, Rob. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmsforever Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Anybody know what the round pins in the track at London Rd Jctn at first sight they look like oversize Peco track pins any ideas chaps? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium iands Posted March 14, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 14, 2018 Re C6111, I note that "Sewstern Lane" is the alternative name for the crossing, according to the NR LNE Level Crossing database, with the actual name being "Sewestern Lane" (i.e. with an extra "e"). However, the Quail map for the line has it as "Sewerstern Lane". No doubting that it is the same crossing as all quote the mileage as 110 miles 69 chains. Funny how (I assume) local dialects can change the spelling of location names when they are written down. Regards, Ian. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmrspaul Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Radcliffe on Trent removing footbridge Dec 77 J5863 This crane became DRT81120 Diesel Mechanical 0-6-0 crane built Thomas Smith of Rodley 1952 http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brdrt811--/e26dbb8e9 http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brdrt811--/e38dcdbc1 http://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brdrt811--/e3f4d3527 Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold DaveF Posted March 14, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted March 14, 2018 Re C6111, I note that "Sewstern Lane" is the alternative name for the crossing, according to the NR LNE Level Crossing database, with the actual name being "Sewestern Lane" (i.e. with an extra "e"). However, the Quail map for the line has it as "Sewerstern Lane". No doubting that it is the same crossing as all quote the mileage as 110 miles 69 chains. Funny how (I assume) local dialects can change the spelling of location names when they are written down. Regards, Ian. It really should be Sewstern Lane as it goes to the village of Sewstern, eventually. David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swindon 123 Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 Anybody know what the round pins in the track at London Rd Jctn at first sight they look like oversize Peco track pins any ideas chaps? It might be to do with the bridge constuction and setting the sleeper spacing, as they look a lot closer spaced than the track to the left of it. A quick comparison count of the sleepers on the two tracks does seem to support this. I've never seen them on any other bridge though. Paul J. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Popular Post DaveF Posted March 15, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Popular Post Share Posted March 15, 2018 (edited) Some photos along the ECML for this afternoon. Essendine Class 47 down parcels Aug 83 C6182 Burton le Coggles Class 55 9014 up Aug 72 J3101 Barkston Class 55 D9008 Newcastle to Kings X Feb 70 J2067 Claypole Class 55 down July 69 J1779 Dukeries Junction Class 254 down Nov 83 C6325 David Edited March 15, 2018 by DaveF 34 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leopardml2341 Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 Hello Dave, J2067, not sure about it being 9002, nameplate looks a bit small for that. I know it's bad form not to offer an alternative suggestion, but I'm at a loss on that one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium brushman47544 Posted March 15, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 15, 2018 Sorry David but your 55s are wrong. J3101 when enlarged is clearly 9014 (not 9019) and J2067 is 9008 - note the taller crest - not 9002. J1779 is more difficult. It looks like an HA allocated one-liner without a crest, which suggests 55013. 55004, 55016 and 55022 would still have had their crests in 1969 so less likely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Market65 Posted March 15, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 15, 2018 Hi, Dave. I like the ECML photos, and the first photo, at Essendine, of a 47 on a train of BR GUV's makes a fine sight indeed. With warmest regards, Rob. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold DaveF Posted March 15, 2018 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted March 15, 2018 Sorry David but your 55s are wrong. J3101 when enlarged is clearly 9014 (not 9019) and J2067 is 9008 - note the taller crest - not 9002. J1779 is more difficult. It looks like an HA allocated one-liner without a crest, which suggests 55013. 55004, 55016 and 55022 would still have had their crests in 1969 so less likely. Thanks Andrew. Today has not been the best of days, having captioned the photos from Dad's notes some time ago I completely forgot to give them a final check today before posting. David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Western Glory Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 Some photos along the ECML for this afternoon. Claypole Class 55 down July 69 J1779.jpg Claypole Class 55 down July 69 J1779 David Based on nameplate length I'd say candidates are D9000 or D9013. D9004 nameplate too long and same for D9016, I think. There is something between the louvres above the nameplate that is consistent with a round badge, therefore I'll opt for D9000: http://www.napier-chronicles.co.uk/0272.htm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
locoholic Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 The old station was further on in outskirts, if such they can be called, of Grassington itself, possibly half a mile further. They were set back from the road into the village, hidden by other buildings. I think the old station was pretty close to the main road out of Grassington - the building in the background in J289 is on the other side of that road. The site is covered by houses now. At Swinden Quarry the road was realigned to allow expansion of the quarry after steam finished on the branch, so the bit of road visible by the two parked shunters didn't exist when the line continued to Grassington proper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now