34theletterbetweenB&D Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 Anyone mind if I have another stab in the dark? Ok, given that our colonial cousins across the pond are to be blessed with 'Skarloey' to run on 9mm gauge track, I wonder if at last the various tentacles of the Bachmann empire might get their collective shit together for long enough for a parallel UK model of Talyllyn to appear? This sort of thing has occurred to me in the past, but I suspect an obstacle in the form of the licence holder. The licenced items are made to replicate the often distorted book drawings or televised model versions. And even if these happen to be reasonably accurate it is not in their interest to have a non-licence fee liable equivalent available; and if we assume that they are aware of this possibility, the licence terms may impose a restriction. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevelewis Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 Has any one else commented that the wagons shown in the SKARLOEY loco flyer in post 205 looks very like the PECO L&B stock in fact it looks the same has a deal been done I wonder?? ALSO NOTE 00-9 modellers if the loco does reach our shores... its quoted minimum radius is 11.25" so 9" will be too tight. .. 9" being the radius of Peco 00-9 set track curves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waverley47708 Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 A Class 120 would be great, however up here in ScotRail land in the mid 1980s they ran with 101 middle coaches. Wonder what the chance of a 2 car 120 and the release of 101 middle coaches would be! Unlikely me thinks. Class 47 large logo would be nice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Joseph_Pestell Posted February 16, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 16, 2015 Yes indeed on the 4CEP. They brought out the MLV in jaffa cake livery and then....perhaps we can expect the 4CEP refurbished (with the hopper windows) in Jaffa Cake? (Along with a 2-HAP obviously....wish, wish.) And surely it has to make sense to tool up a Buffet car and have a 4BEP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robday12 Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 A lot of two-car DMUs only need tooling for one body. Two car DMUs had one vehicle with a van section for the guard, the second car would have a toilet comparment (where fitted) but no van section. So two body types are needed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseRambler Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 As a fan of BR blue in the early to mid 80s, my twopenneth for what it's worth: Class 09 Class 37/0 Split headcode - Eastfield (Loch) or Thornaby (British Steel) namer Class 40 - Discs or Centre headcode Class 45 or 46 - Centre marker lights Class 47 - Large log/Black headcode As for brand new stuff Class 86 Class 87 Class 123/124 And how about a Sheerness steel bogie wagon (PXA?) or a PortTalbot - Llanwern Iron ore wagon? Here's hoping. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rope runner Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 Something industrial steam please, LMS Ironstone Hoppers too... Although I won't hold my breath for either of those Paul A. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold tetsudofan Posted February 16, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 16, 2015 ....and why not some motorised 1938 tube trains using the EFE bodies.....maybe two car units for the tourist market and 4-car or whatever for us. Keith Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Dunsignalling Posted February 16, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 16, 2015 A Class 120 would be great, however up here in ScotRail land in the mid 1980s they ran with 101 middle coaches. Wonder what the chance of a 2 car 120 and the release of 101 middle coaches would be! Unlikely me thinks. Trouble is, a 2-car 120 would go down like a lead balloon with those who want the full WR set. I can't see them releasing a 101 intermediate car on its own but, if they did both classes in 3-car form, following them up with a Scottish Region mixed set (possibly as a retailer commission) would be easy. John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Storey Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 Has that not been announced by Flangeway that they will be producing it in RTR format? Are they still trading? Their website has not been updated since January 2013? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Dunsignalling Posted February 16, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 16, 2015 Are they still trading? Their website has not been updated since January 2013? Presumably so; the announcement was covered in the January 2015 edition of Hornby magazine. I've certainly seen them at exhibitions during the past 12 months. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
locoholic Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 I would love Bachmann to make a model of 1F 41835, with Salter safety valves, round-topped boiler and polished safety valve cover, which it retained until the early 1960s, I believe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsp3970 Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 There is no reason why Bachmann can't release DMU centre cars separately. Honrby did it, Lima did it, so why can't Bachmann? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSE Mule Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 One simply request, a Network Southeast 4TC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Joseph_Pestell Posted February 16, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 16, 2015 Two car DMUs had one vehicle with a van section for the guard, the second car would have a toilet comparment (where fitted) but no van section. So two body types are needed. Only on first generation DMUs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robday12 Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 Only on first generation DMUs. I'm only interested in 1st DMUs. The modern day railway is not worth bothering about! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium newbryford Posted February 16, 2015 RMweb Premium Share Posted February 16, 2015 Only on first generation DMUs. Not strictly true. The 150 has two different shells - with/without toilet window, as well as differing roof panels with/without the water tank. Cheers, Mick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Joseph_Pestell Posted February 16, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 16, 2015 Not strictly true. The 150 has two different shells - with/without toilet window, as well as differing roof panels with/without the water tank. Cheers, Mick I'm not an expert on tooling for injection moulding. But I think that is doable with one tool and some slides. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jol Wilkinson Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 There is no reason why Bachmann can't release DMU centre cars separately. Honrby did it, Lima did it, so why can't Bachmann? Have you asked them? There may be some entirely logical explanation although I doubt it would be satisfactory for anyone that wants one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonC Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Only on first generation DMUs. Are the second generation DMUs not the same? The Class 150s and 156s certainly have a single toilet per 2-car unit, I think the 158s are the same off the top of my head Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonC Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Trouble is, a 2-car 120 would go down like a lead balloon with those who want the full WR set. I can't see them releasing a 101 intermediate car on its own but, if they did both classes in 3-car form, following them up with a Scottish Region mixed set (possibly as a retailer commission) would be easy. John If we're doubting whether a Class 120 3 car unit on its own could be produced I really cant see a Class 120/101 hybrid being sold. I think any hybrids would be up to the purchaser to put together Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Andy W Posted February 17, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted February 17, 2015 Are the second generation DMUs not the same? The Class 150s and 156s certainly have a single toilet per 2-car unit, I think the 158s are the same off the top of my head As are all three kinds of Pacers, and class 155. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinWales Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 J26/J27, Q6, G5 Standard Class 3 2-6-0 And hopefully some really tasty wagons like a Palvan or Palbrick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidw Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Just pondering this: a couple of years back Hornby came left of field with the L1 tank. Perhaps Bachmann will surprise use with some lovelly NBR loco's. Still hoping for a mk1 BSO, FO outside chance of an RB. Augment the already announced Thompson retool with a BG, RF and RTO/RPTO. Lovelly coaches. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OOgaugeJaf Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 J26/J27, Q6, G5 Standard Class 3 2-6-0 And hopefully some really tasty wagons like a Palvan or Palbrick I agree with the J27 and Standard 3. The Q6 is already planned with DJM so I think they should leave that one alone. I would prefer the A5 or A8 as a tank locomotive or N10. There is also the J21 but I believe the charity owning group are progressing with plans for that one. Could be Bachmann or another though at this stage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.