Jump to content
 

Big Bertha


No Decorum
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
25 minutes ago, Steamport Southport said:

 

Not to my knowledge.

 

It wasn't built until 1919 when the Midland had stopped painting anything except the passenger locomotives crimson and I think that was only the "top link" locomotives such as the 4Ps that got it post WWI.

 

I have a feeling people might be confusing the works grey images with crimson.

 

The 1926 repaint was probably its first.

 

This old postcard is about right for its Midland condition.

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

 

Where's our MR experts?

 

 

Jason

I wonder how long the fence on the front lasted?

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, melmerby said:

I wonder how long the fence on the front lasted?

 

That's a bit of a sore point.

 

The locomotive was meant to have been preserved and was on the official list. But when they revised the list, it was omitted along with a few others.

 

But the handrails* and lamp survived as they were deemed iconic. But they disappeared at some point. There was an article about it in one of the quality railway magazines a few years ago.

 

*Handrail to reach the lamp and also used as a sight for crews to buffer up to trains when banking

 

 

 

Jason

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess the good thing about Big Bertha/Emma is that despite being a one-off like the Fell, it didn't get extensively modified throughout its working life. Hopefully KR Models would produce a model which most would perceive as "accurate". Also having no flangeless centre driving wheels like the 9F, it'd be interesting to see how the model handles curves.

 

 

Ok now who else wants a BR Maroon (late crest) 58100 to put in front of a 12-coach express?

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Bertha is one of those models I've wanted in RTR for most of my life, It's a loco I absolutely adore. But I have so little faith in KR to actually get it right I can't bring myself to order one.

It's not like the project is even off to the promising start with their choice of liveries. No MR livery, but LMS Crimson which it never carried! Seriously? What is it with KR and liveries?

Edited by Obsidian Quarry
  • Like 7
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Steamport Southport said:

 

That's a bit of a sore point.

 

The locomotive was meant to have been preserved and was on the official list. But when they revised the list, it was omitted along with a few others.

 

But the handrails* and lamp survived as they were deemed iconic. But they disappeared at some point. There was an article about it in one of the quality railway magazines a few years ago.

 

*Handrail to reach the lamp and also used as a sight for crews to buffer up to trains when banking

 

 

 

Jason

 

The headlight was transferred to the 9F that replaced it on the Lickey.

 

CJI

 

  • Agree 4
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, cctransuk said:

 

The headlight was transferred to the 9F that replaced it on the Lickey.

 

CJI

 

 

It was. But it was still saved and was part of the National Collection.

 

I don't think that 92079 kept the lamp for long and none of the other 9Fs used had one. It seems to have lost it in 1959 during a works visit.

 

 

Jason

  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Steamport Southport said:

I'll stick with the DJH version of Big Emma as the MR railwaymen called it.

 

I'd love to know when Big Bertha became more popular as the nickname, but looking through old books and magazines it was definitely Emma.

 

 

 

Jason

I must admit I've never heard it called Big Emma before today. Everyday's a school day!

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Steamport Southport said:

This old postcard is about right for its Midland condition.

 

spacer.png

 

Where's our MR experts?

 

Jason

 

Age is relative. the "old postcard" is from about 1970 and certainly not contemporary with the real thing. In BR days it was given LNWR style lining.

 

14 hours ago, Steamport Southport said:

The locomotive was meant to have been preserved and was on the official list. But when they revised the list, it was omitted along with a few others.

 

At one time it was said that the cylinder block would be preserved. in the early-mid 1960s it was still dumped at Derby loco Works along with the Fell's main gearbox.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GWR-fan said:

Given the issues with the latest release and the complexity of the announced 0-10-0 banker,  then I would be very surprised to see the item manufactured.  

 

 

Did Bertha change at all throughout its life? If not then its a simpler prototype compared to the Fell or simpler to produce compared to bellerophon which has complex valve gear. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pre Grouping fan said:

 

Did Bertha change at all throughout its life? If not then its a simpler prototype compared to the Fell or simpler to produce compared to bellerophon which has complex valve gear. 

 

Ten flanged wheels and a close coupled tender cab!!!!!!!!  The Fell to me is a far simpler model,  mechanically.  There is nothing complex about the Fell other than getting the body correct.   The Europeans do reliable ten-coupled designs but then they engineer them correctly and price them accordingly. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Found a Cigarette advert (I think?) with Big Bertha in MR Crimson during one of my research sessions back when I was attempting to bring the loco into Train Simulator a few years ago. Don't believe the loco ever wore the livery but it does look good in my opinion. Reminds me of how a green example of a certain Gresley experiment (not in rebuilt form) came to be from Hornby in a way.

 

Photo credit: cigcardpix (Flickr)

17198292395_e4665ccee0_b.jpg

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

.

 

I know that the loco has "charisma" (of sorts) but I am surprised that if KR are doing a 10-coupled loco that they didn't choose a WD 2-10-0, only 10 of them but more widely travelled.

 

( Still, maybe that is what Hornby will announce tomorrow !    😁  )

 

.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Pre Grouping fan said:

 

Did Bertha change at all throughout its life? If not then its a simpler prototype compared to the Fell or simpler to produce compared to bellerophon which has complex valve gear. 

I don't know why, but somewhere I have gained an impression that the tender was different (not just by the presence of the tender cab) from other Fowler tenders or perhaps altered at some stage in the loco's life, something to do with the coal space,

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Steamport Southport said:

 

I dread to think what he called the Worsborough Banker when that turned up!

 

 

 

Jason

Yeah, it seems that it was not that popular!

Apparently, in August 1955, 69999 was trialled as an oil burner but again, not successfully.

The “Big-un” was much more appreciated.

From “Life on the Lickey 1943 - 1986” by Patrick ‘Pat’ Wallace,  Brewin books.

Not a particularly easy read imho but fascinating nevertheless. This book has given me many ideas and a lot of interest in this line, of which 2290/58100 is a principle component but never did I think she might be modelled RTR.

 

Big Bertha is how I’ve always thought of this engine and being a Derby lad, I’d probably want a model anyway. I just hope it’s a worthy one.

 

John

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Pre Grouping fan said:

 

Did Bertha change at all throughout its life? If not then its a simpler prototype compared to the Fell or simpler to produce compared to bellerophon which has complex valve gear. 

The tender was cut down from its original form but I don’t know when, likely early on as it was to facilitate easier coaling.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a killjoy,but this is all getting quite depressing now,with various manufacturers fighting to get in first with all these obscure one-off prototypes,when bread-and-butter prototypes which existed in their dozens,sometimes hundreds are being continually ignored.

I know people will quote rule 1 ,but I'm seeing a total imbalance on model layouts these days of the everyday Vs the exceptional.I mean ,how many people model the Lickey Incline? So is this going to sit in a showcase or is history going to be rewritten that Big Bertha worked over Shap,or on a Cornish china clay branch line ? 

As for the fictitious liveries that seem to abound these days,Rapido being another culprit of this, a few years back any manufacturer doing this would be slated 

 

  • Like 3
  • Agree 9
  • Round of applause 2
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree with the last post they are simply milking the tooling to the extreme, on total nonsense liveries .

 

Why anybody buys them who knows ??  If they actually made run of the mill Locos, they would sell far far more !!.

Edited by micklner
  • Agree 3
  • Round of applause 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...