RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted December 5, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 5, 2015 Interesting mechanical arrangement although quite why is a bit baffling - possibly to make assembly easier re the alignment motor-gearbox. Looks pretty obvious that a motor fitted direct to the gearbox with a flywheel on its end (or between it and the gearbox) then it would clear the gap below the boiler. The arrangement has similarities to that long used in a number of US diesel outline models, viz motor-flywheel - universal joint - worm and gear tower, although in that arrangement the universal joint has an obvious purpose. I wonder if the factory have simply adopted the layout from something they are familiar with (or have researched)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tender Posted December 5, 2015 Share Posted December 5, 2015 None at all I'd say. The only bit of empty space is inside the smokebox. Think I'll wait for the red box version. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Nile Posted December 5, 2015 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 5, 2015 As I've had the body apart here are some photos of the details in and around the cab. 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSpencer Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 That is interesting. They have left a big hole in the firebox door. Did they do this purposely to allow us to fit firebox glow? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Brasher Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 I would like to see a return of firebox glow and a driver and fireman. Hornby used to include these figures and I liked it when they were in period costume as they were in the Rocket. I think it is too early to decide not to buy the Oxfordrail version because the Hornby version may be better. I think people should wait until they have both come out, to read the reviews and examine the models before deciding. I will be buying both so I can compare them and I have already ordered the Oxfordrail 488 as preserved on the Bluebell Line. Perhaps 488 would not be historically accurate with figures from the early 1900s as the locomotive looked slightly different then so it should have modern figures. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Oldddudders Posted December 6, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 6, 2015 My understanding is that one can only see firebox glow when the doors are open. The doors are only opened to enable the fireman to add coal. A humble tank engine on secondary and branch duties may not have the need for heavy firing very often. Thus the firebox glow would seldom be visible in reality, and only briefly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Gwiwer Posted December 6, 2015 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 6, 2015 My understanding is that one can only see firebox glow when the doors are open. The doors are only opened to enable the fireman to add coal. A humble tank engine on secondary and branch duties may not have the need for heavy firing very often. Thus the firebox glow would seldom be visible in reality, and only briefly. As well the same consideration applies as to cab lights in "modern" traction - you can't see the illumination as brightly in daylight simply because there is already a good deal of natural light. Firebox glow might be a "nice-to-have" for some modellers just as is illuminated rolling stock; personally I can live without both the above. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSpencer Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 I have firebox glow added to a C class and a black 5 linked in with DCC sound. The light pops on each time the fireman shovels coal. It is very effective. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold NHY 581 Posted December 6, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 6, 2015 Finally had a look at one in the flesh....er...plastic....er..tin..whatever. My decision to wait for the Hornby Radial remains the way forward. The infilling under the boiler completely ruins the look of a very graceful and dare I say delicate prototype. The lack of daylight kills the model for me. The drive for this model appears to be a bit of a lash up. I fail to see the need for the drive shaft and universal joint. More moving parts to break. A more traditional drive would have left room in the boiler for the DCC gubbins as well as freeing up the under boiler area. This, coupled to the price would have been unbeatable. Rob. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Brasher Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 The people who have posted in the Oxford Diecast Facebook site have been impressed with the Adams Radial so it looks like our hobby will be receiving some new recruits from model vehicle collectors. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium newbryford Posted December 6, 2015 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 6, 2015 The people who have posted in the Oxford Diecast Facebook site have been impressed with the Adams Radial so it looks like our hobby will be receiving some new recruits from model vehicle collectors. But how many of them will actually run the thing? I think the clue is in the word "collector". At least it'll boost sales. Cheers, Mick 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold roundhouse Posted December 6, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 6, 2015 Gave mine a good run in on the rolling road. Decoder still fine after that and the loco is running very smoothly 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium jjb1970 Posted December 6, 2015 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 6, 2015 (edited) I'm interested to see the next Oxford loco. Is the Adams radial indicative of their long term market positioning (aimed at a lower price point with some compromises to reflect that) or were they feeling their way with this release and will take note of the criticisms to improve their next release? I think there is an opportunity for a company losing a little bit of the finery in return for a competitive price (a segment Hornby have served with their new Railroad tooling I think) but it is not really what most expected when this effort was announced. Perhaps their next release will move things up a notch. Edited December 6, 2015 by jjb1970 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
asmay2002 Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 I think there is an opportunity for a company losing a little bit of the finery in return for a competitive price (a segment Hornby have served with their new Railroad tooling I think) but it is not really what most expected when this effort was announced. The trouble is some of the finery is there (e.g readable gauges in the cab) mixed with inexplicable howlers such as the lump of metal where daylight should be, and the missing firebox door. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium newbryford Posted December 6, 2015 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 6, 2015 (edited) The trouble is some of the finery is there (e.g readable gauges in the cab) mixed with inexplicable howlers such as the lump of metal where daylight should be, and the missing firebox door. There looks to be some sort of moulding representing the open sliding firebox door and associated levers.(That is if a Radial has a sliding firebox door?) Cheers, ick Edited December 6, 2015 by newbryford Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Dunsignalling Posted December 6, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 6, 2015 But how many of them will actually run the thing? I think the clue is in the word "collector". At least it'll boost sales. Cheers, Mick It has been stated that 80%+ of Hornby sales are to collectors so probably not much different. John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerrySVR Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 Gave mine a good run in on the rolling road. Decoder still fine after that and the loco is running very smoothly It would be useful to know which decoder you used, Rails tried another decoder and that overheated, they were told to hard wire the chip!! Like most folks I want Oxford to succeed but want to know that this model can run. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adams442T Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 (edited) There looks to be some sort of moulding representing the open sliding firebox door and associated levers.(That is if a Radial has a sliding firebox door?) Cheers, ick Most of Adams designs, in fact I can't think of one that didn't, had a sliding firebox door(s). It would appear that (see Neil's excellent photos above #1360, top photo) they have made the moulding give an impression of a sliding door. They just haven't filled the hole in! Attached is an Adams LT&SR locomotive firebox door. As you can see it has a square sliding door, but a round firing hole, with a drop down plate. See next page (#1376) for a clearer image Edited December 6, 2015 by Adams442T Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adams442T Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 This image gives perhaps a clearer view 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Brasher Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 The picture on the Oxford Diecast Facebook page shows the Oxfordrail Adams Radial running on a layout so that is what I would expect the owners to do. Oxford's policy is to make a large number of models. They don't usually make limited runs so they are designed to be run and not to be kept in a glass case as an investment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium newbryford Posted December 6, 2015 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 6, 2015 (edited) . They don't usually make limited runs so they are designed to be run and not to be kept in a glass case as an investment. Try telling that to my brother....... Cheers, Mick Edited December 6, 2015 by newbryford 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted December 6, 2015 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 6, 2015 The picture on the Oxford Diecast Facebook page shows the Oxfordrail Adams Radial running on a layout so that is what I would expect the owners to do. Oxford's policy is to make a large number of models. They don't usually make limited runs so they are designed to be run and not to be kept in a glass case as an investment. I'm sure all mass market r-t-r locos are designed to be run but what actually happens to them could well be a different story. A friend in the retail trade used to order a minimum of 24 of each new release Hornby loco because he knew that he would have buyers for them; on top of that number he also ordered in to match his pre-orders from other customers plus whatever he decided he might need for stock. Of the 24 I doubt if more than a handful of them even came out of the box let alone turned a wheel once they were in the collector buyer's hands. That might not be typical of all retailers of course but i think there's little doubt that a lot of locos (in particular) go to collectors rather than folk who are going to run them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG John Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 It has been stated that 80%+ of Hornby sales are to collectors so probably not much different. John Why do "collectors" collect working models that are made inaccurate in major details, in order to make them work for slightly less than 20%* of buyers? Surely displaying items in glass cabinets, with steam roller wheels a scale 7 inches too close together, big lumps of plastic on the ends to take unrealistic couplings, and that will never run, is a bit weird. If I collected models to put on display, I wouldn't be bothered about a motor and gears, especially if it blocked out daylight where the prototype had it, but would want correctly gauged scale wheels and accurate details at both ends, so it looked as much like the real thing as possible. * With a small percentage of P4 and EM modellers who have to go to great lengths to alter them! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymw Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 It doesn't matter what you collect, if you collect as either a 'fan boy', or as an investment See here -http://www.ted.com/talks/josh_luber_the_secret_sneaker_market_and_why_it_matters Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidH Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 (edited) Why do "collectors" collect working models that are made inaccurate in major details, in order to make them work for slightly less than 20%* of buyers? One answer I am sure is that people are collecting them solely as "models", and they aren't interested in the accuracy. There's nothing that says people have to have 100% accuracy to like them as models/toys - think pre-war tinplate or old Tri-ang. Edited December 7, 2015 by DavidH Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now